and that is why Bush made a new law against torture. and I dont know who but some minister wanted a exeption for CIA agents.FeloniousMonk wrote:
See, the torture thing is utter nonesense. The US doesn't torture suspects and prisoners, but not because it's illegal. That certainly helps avoid abuses but the primary reason that torture isn't performed by CIA officers is because TORTURE DOES NOT WORK. No interrogator worth his salt would waste his time with torture because not only does it take a lot longer to get information from someone who has undoubtedly been trained to withstand those techniques but the plain and simple truth is that torture will more often than not result in false information.fdcp_elmo wrote:
I think this problem is about the rumor that there are secret CIA prisons in europe where CIA agents torture terrorist suspects.
Rice said the US don't torture suspects however she didn't mention that the secret CIA prisons don't exist.
It would be very rude indeed when even the european leaders dont know anything about the existence of these prisons.
but untill now it still remains a rumour
A good interrogator knows that the best way to get reliable information is to get the suspect to trust you and to use his own conscience against him.
at least this is what I saw in the papers and on the news.
but indeed torture never get's truth out of people. they confess because they don't want more pain. It has been proved that way since the medieval ages when torture was a normal way to get the suspect say the "truth"