He never did actually.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
the above two posts make me weep for humanity
partially because uzique is no longer posting eloquently.
Absolute lol. Are you butthurt because I said LBP is shit? Now now, don't be a little bitch serge.sergeriver wrote:
He never did actually.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
the above two posts make me weep for humanity
partially because uzique is no longer posting eloquently.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Mhmmm nope.sergeriver wrote:
Most people wouldn't want the game without Ferrari.Zimmer wrote:
That's PRECISELY why it will fail.sergeriver wrote:
I don't think it will have car damage. Ferrari asked them not to show their cars wrecked.
You show this perfect render of a car, pure realism, and then negate to have damage on the fucking game? Bullshit.
It's meant to be a hardcore racing game, with beautiful graphics, realistic cars and lovely driving.... yet it has no damage factor in it? Fuck that.
We are in the 21st century of gaming, FPS games are starting to have destructible buildings and car games have had destructible cars for over 4 years now, yet GT5 thinks its above the rest and doesn't have it.
I would buy the game if they had not taken the Ferrari licence but added in damage. What a terrible terrible move.
Didnt have them in 3, that sold well
Didnt have them in 4, that sold well
Dunno bout 1& 2, never had a ps1
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Lol, I don't care about LBP. It even isn't my favorite game, I just can't stand people talking about things they know shit about.Uzique wrote:
Absolute lol. Are you butthurt because I said LBP is shit? Now now, don't be a little bitch serge.sergeriver wrote:
He never did actually.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
the above two posts make me weep for humanity
partially because uzique is no longer posting eloquently.
That's not 'eloquence'.sergeriver wrote:
Lol, I don't care about LBP. It even isn't my favorite game, I just can't stand people talking about things they know shit about.Uzique wrote:
Absolute lol. Are you butthurt because I said LBP is shit? Now now, don't be a little bitch serge.sergeriver wrote:
He never did actually.
...
Damn, I can't stand it when people talk shit about something they know nothing about.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
GT5P has them, you can't take them out.FatherTed wrote:
Mhmmm nope.sergeriver wrote:
Most people wouldn't want the game without Ferrari.Zimmer wrote:
That's PRECISELY why it will fail.
You show this perfect render of a car, pure realism, and then negate to have damage on the fucking game? Bullshit.
It's meant to be a hardcore racing game, with beautiful graphics, realistic cars and lovely driving.... yet it has no damage factor in it? Fuck that.
We are in the 21st century of gaming, FPS games are starting to have destructible buildings and car games have had destructible cars for over 4 years now, yet GT5 thinks its above the rest and doesn't have it.
I would buy the game if they had not taken the Ferrari licence but added in damage. What a terrible terrible move.
Didnt have them in 3, that sold well
Didnt have them in 4, that sold well
Dunno bout 1& 2, never had a ps1
Wasn't it going to be called GT-HD originally?
Sad that GT hasn't come to PC...i used to spend hours doing endurance races on Super Speedway, just so i could put turbos on my NSX
good times, GT3 was.
Sad that GT hasn't come to PC...i used to spend hours doing endurance races on Super Speedway, just so i could put turbos on my NSX
good times, GT3 was.
What the fuck? Are we now rating a game on what CAR it has in it?sergeriver wrote:
GT5P has them, you can't take them out.
You can take out whatever you want from a game if what you put back in will make it better.
EVERY (or close to) single GT fan in this world has been raging at Kazunori Yamauchi and telling him to pull his hand out of his ass and get damage on cars ( I need not quote, just search on Google ). Yet he doesn't do it? I call failure.
lolwut. Why not?sergeriver wrote:
GT5P has them, you can't take them out.FatherTed wrote:
Mhmmm nope.sergeriver wrote:
Most people wouldn't want the game without Ferrari.
Didnt have them in 3, that sold well
Didnt have them in 4, that sold well
Dunno bout 1& 2, never had a ps1
If this game doesn't have damage, I'll be massively dissapointed.
If content filtering would allow me to see what this thread is about i would comment, alas, i can't. Anyway, i never liked the GT series.
Sif have damage in a GT game, its a simulation, and of course it wasn't real without it, but it was fun knowing that you can crash and not give a dam about your wheel well imploding.
there should be a simulation mode and a real, damage mode.
there should be a simulation mode and a real, damage mode.
sim = damage.Acreta wrote:
Sif have damage in a GT game, its a simulation, and of course it wasn't real without it, but it was fun knowing that you can crash and not give a dam about your wheel well imploding.
there should be a simulation mode and a real, damage mode.
Simulation mode (damage, realistic handling etc) and Arcade mode (like GRiD, burnout, NFS without damage - I don't care, arcade is shit anyway), if anything...
Thats the nicest car render I have ever seen. Nice find Serge
I prefer Forza 2
Does this make me a bad man
Does this make me a bad man
To Serge, probably.Kptk92 wrote:
I prefer Forza 2
Does this make me a bad man
I haven't played Forza 2 yet...hell, the only racing game I own right now is Burnout Paradise for the PS3.
i mean with a career mode choice of everything as realistic as possible, without damage, and the ladder, WITH damage.Jenspm wrote:
sim = damage.Acreta wrote:
Sif have damage in a GT game, its a simulation, and of course it wasn't real without it, but it was fun knowing that you can crash and not give a dam about your wheel well imploding.
there should be a simulation mode and a real, damage mode.
Simulation mode (damage, realistic handling etc) and Arcade mode (like GRiD, burnout, NFS without damage - I don't care, arcade is shit anyway), if anything...
which can't be changed on the fly.
nah just a cuntKptk92 wrote:
Does this make me a bad man
<3
Bell, you're out of Team BF2s F1
jk, we need our First Driver <3
jk, we need our First Driver <3
Forza 2's ok, but it just takes forever to get anything good. I do like the customization on it though.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
They have always probably had the top of the line graphics for any game. Glad to see they still live up to their expectations. You know, considering the graphics and physics engine that they put into the Gran Turismo series, it's hard to believe that other game companies put much effort into games of their own.
Well, Mek said it, these guys do things in the perfect way or they don't do them. Maybe they don't consider the car damage achieved to be perfect. So, you won't have car damage.Zimmer wrote:
What the fuck? Are we now rating a game on what CAR it has in it?sergeriver wrote:
GT5P has them, you can't take them out.
You can take out whatever you want from a game if what you put back in will make it better.
EVERY (or close to) single GT fan in this world has been raging at Kazunori Yamauchi and telling him to pull his hand out of his ass and get damage on cars ( I need not quote, just search on Google ). Yet he doesn't do it? I call failure.
it happens to every body when you are on a 24 le mans race and you are at the last lap and you go slightly on the grass and your car spins out.Zimmer wrote:
What? Did I ever say that?aerodynamic wrote:
if it's for harcore gamers are you gonna try to crash on purpose?
never in a racing car game i wanted to crash on the wall on purpose, not even with grid.
When a car hits me or clips me in the back whilst racing, I want to see a dent there or a loss of a bumper. When my car flips over whilst I am doing rally, I want to see dents or a broken window. When my car accidentally skids off the road and hits the wall, I want to see that take effect.
I don't want to see a shiny gleaming and unreal car that's invincible when I am racing. That was why GTAIV was so incredible. The car destruction was near perfect in it.
Now, would you rather go hit the wall and see the incredible crash which destroys your car and your race which will make you furious or hit the wall and then get back to the race?
Going to skip most of the thread and get to the point thats in my head just now (cos i was just reading and this came to me).
Forza 2 had Ferarri damage did it not?
I have to agree with Jens. After playing Forza 2 for many many many many hours, and then playing GT4 on my friends PS2, GT4 was just laughable. You can bounce off walls at 100mph and just carry on as if nothing happened. There's no penalty for bad driving. Try bumping another car off the track on Forza 2 and you'll regret it.
Forza 2 had Ferarri damage did it not?
I have to agree with Jens. After playing Forza 2 for many many many many hours, and then playing GT4 on my friends PS2, GT4 was just laughable. You can bounce off walls at 100mph and just carry on as if nothing happened. There's no penalty for bad driving. Try bumping another car off the track on Forza 2 and you'll regret it.
Last edited by Spidery_Yoda (2009-01-19 10:43:50)
Why not just put in epic arcade-style handling so you don't need to break? Would make life so much easier.aerodynamic wrote:
it happens to every body when you are on a 24 le mans race and you are at the last lap and you go slightly on the grass and your car spins out.Zimmer wrote:
What? Did I ever say that?aerodynamic wrote:
if it's for harcore gamers are you gonna try to crash on purpose?
never in a racing car game i wanted to crash on the wall on purpose, not even with grid.
When a car hits me or clips me in the back whilst racing, I want to see a dent there or a loss of a bumper. When my car flips over whilst I am doing rally, I want to see dents or a broken window. When my car accidentally skids off the road and hits the wall, I want to see that take effect.
I don't want to see a shiny gleaming and unreal car that's invincible when I am racing. That was why GTAIV was so incredible. The car destruction was near perfect in it.
Now, would you rather go hit the wall and see the incredible crash which destroys your car and your race which will make you furious or hit the wall and then get back to the race?
And your point isn't really valid - I'm pretty sure damage is on, even though damage graphics aren't? Or is my GT4 memory not working... In any case, you can cheat your way through and turn damage off if you want that.
Playing online without damage is a joke. The best way to win is to ram the others off the track - take a look at Forza 2 at CGS (youtube Forza 2 CGS). Pathetic.
@Spidery_Yoda: Yes, Forza 2 has Ferraris and damage, which is why I think GT5 will have damage.
I hate that. Crashes are inevitable, and it's not like I wouldn't buy a Ferrari just because it doesn't look as good when it's all smashed up.sergeriver wrote:
I don't think it will have car damage. Ferrari asked them not to show their cars wrecked.Jenspm wrote:
I'm pretty sure I heard it will have it.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
I bet it still doesn't have crash damage