Poll

Does 2142 Suck?

Yes40%40% - 65
No50%50% - 81
Yes8%8% - 14
Total: 160
Doperwt.
Anouk, Slayers little bitch
+80|6615|Belgium

m3thod wrote:

Its tailored more to stoopid infantry combat.

what part of FIELD in battlefield don't these fuckers understand?
I tought BF2, had mostly infantry only servers:P so, why you all are whining about infantryplay?:s
Stubbee
Religions Hate Facts, Questions and Doubts
+223|6964|Reality
I think people would have had more fun if they had spent thier money on condoms.
The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'
heggs
Spamalamadingdong
+581|6609|New York
I prefer 2142 to BF2.
I don't have to worry about jetwhores killing me every 2 seconds. I get rewarded by getting awards, instead of just having e-Bling. The game as a whole is more balanced than BF2 was (although they did a good job of balancing it out in AF). The unlock and ranking system gives me something to look forward to, unlike in BF2 where you have insane point gaps between ranks. Because everything is more balanced, you need a good degree of skill with the weapons and vehicles to come out on top. Also, teamwork, in theory, is more central to the gameplay (i have yet to see people really getting together as they should).
Remember Me As A Time Of Day
rawls2
Mr. Bigglesworth
+89|6781
It seems those who don't like it thought it would be exactly like bf2 with futuristic weapons. I bought it, played for a week and dumped it for the og bf2. I tried again a month later and haven't stopped since. The patches have made it more stable which has allowed me to get over the noob phase and now I love it. (Only Titan mode, Conquest bites)
Titan mode = tough grinding ground battles for control of silos which leads to epic fire fight battles aboard the titans.
David.P
Banned
+649|6495
I only played it once and to tell ya the truth it was'nt that bad but what made it suck was the stupid unlocks. I mean why are nades an unlock? They made it too much like an rpg thank god they did'nt make it turn based.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6666|The Land of Scott Walker
No. Period. Now buy it, you know you want to.
GeoEnvi
Member
+22|6908|Philadelphia, PA
Who the fuck cares?

We all know there's people that won't like it and people who will.  Same type argument with consoles (was GTAIII better than Vice City?)  A question like this is just as subjective as... is the sky blue? is it azure? is it cerulean? is it cobalt?..... etc... etc..... etc....

I personally find it to be very enjoyable and similar to BF2.  The only difference is there seems to be MORE squadplay in 2142 due to the cool squad leader unlocks, NetBat system, and bonus points.  Oh yeah... and there' some wacky space/ice age plot thrown in there instead of this wacky US beats up on "evil doers" plot.

Can we finally put this question/debate/waste of forum-space to bed....permanently?  I propose a posting ban on ANYONE that resurrects this dead / moot issue.
Frotz
Member
+15|6751|Sweden

David.Podedworny wrote:

I only played it once and to tell ya the truth it was'nt that bad but what made it suck was the stupid unlocks. I mean why are nades an unlock? They made it too much like an rpg thank god they did'nt make it turn based.
The difference with 2142 is that you don't have to invest several hundred hours to get the major part of all the unlocks. And the grenades aren't that hard to unlock.

Also, started playing Northern Strike yesterday and it's great!
GO PLAY IT! (Despite what you're thinking now, I'm not EA's slave.)
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6507|Denmark aka Automotive Hell
dammit,, why do you people waste your lives in these forums if you don't like the game?? is it really true that you have nothing better to do, than whine about how much a game sucks,, if you want to do this go to the BF2 section, in there about 80% hates 2142 and will agree to your critisism,, but most of the ppl in here like 2142, so whats the f*cking point of whining in here ????
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
straz_mataz
Banned
+86|6756|Edmonton Alberta
it sucks

i played just 2142 for about 2 months straight..... and the only thing i liked doing was whoring the walkers and trying to get good rounds in the gunship... ( I stopped playing 2142 before they nerfed the AA EMP's)
Superglueman
Member
+21|6581|The Great South Land
Whats all this refering to kits as "classes"...........


..u guys need to go back to Wow..........fantasy fags
Superglueman
Member
+21|6581|The Great South Land
I get it...Bf2 was hardcore...to hardcore for some...so they softened it down, gave it a starwarsy feel...made the soldier throw like a sissy.....made all weapoins inaccurate but the sniper rifle...made distance killing easier(for the cowards) to get the Wow'ers and fantasy fags in to the BF world...


..Go back to your "classes" system....sniper class, support class....wow class
Machine_Madness
Madness has now come over me
+20|6658|Brisbane, Australia

straz_mataz wrote:

it sucks

i played just 2142 for about 2 months straight..... and the only thing i liked doing was whoring the walkers and trying to get good rounds in the gunship... ( I stopped playing 2142 before they nerfed the AA EMP's)
sounds like ur the guy that whores the tank on karkand and whores the MEC helo on sharqi.

--

Gunships dont suck in 2142, you just need skill to fly them now without getting shot down. Sure easier to fly without crashing.  The reason alot of you get blown out of the sky is that your prolly flying to low and EMP makes you crash, flying higher prevents that.  Weapons are accurate, you just need to learn how to use them. the usual pronning in BF2 which made you have super accuracy instantly, doesnt apply. crouching is the new pronning.
Navyseal99
Unintentional Good-Guy
+0|6878
Bf2142 is pretty good. Better than bf2 now, cuz of the dominance of the noobs and their toobs, dolphin divers, etc. Plus, it gives me something to play 'till Halo 3 comes out.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard