BF2S Forums The Mentally Handicapped

^AgentHawk wrote:

Your a retard you sensless bastard!


j/k

But seriously, "retards" get away with everything. I have a kid at school who is retarded and at one time in his life, 7th grade, he CHASED AFTER ONE OF MY FRIENDS WITH AN EXACT-O KNIFE in art class AND NOTHING HAPPENED WITH HIM BUT A SMALL TAP ON THE WRIST! No suspension or anything, detension, nothing! All my friend asked for was one of those fancy crayons. This kid has been in numorus fights and the other kid always gets suspended.

Iam glad you brought this up because TODAY, in 11th grade...yes he is still in school...he flipped out and threw a chair at someone because they told him he was last chair and he had to move over TWO FUCKING SEATS! He stormed off crying and just stayed in the little office separating two class rooms the whole time and just sat there picking his fucking nose! The teacher did nothing because he is afarad of what the school board will do to him if he punishes this fucking mainiac!

Me and my two buddies are waiting for a chance to fucking level this kid! Every day we look for a chance to deck him. I don't care if we get expelled! We have been dealing with him for 6 LONG FUCKING YEARS. This year we have had it, if so much as touches us a little we will level him out!

TO HELL WITH ALL THE FUCKING RETARDS AND THEIR FAMILIES!


To answere your question: NO FUCKING WAY!

YOUR a sick little fuck and the reason for school shootings.  On subject, I see a doctor for depression, Does that make me Mentally Ill or retarded? Should me and MY family be eradicated? WTF kind of topic is this. Even a serial Killer has some compassion and doesnt think shit like this.

BTW you own a trenchcoat you Asshat?

<[onex]>Headstone wrote:

YOUR a sick little fuck and the reason for school sh or retarded? Should me and MY family be eradicated?

Based on a purely logical standpoint, it would depend on how much you contribute to the community versus how much you take from it, relative to everyone else.

From the usual standpoint (which IMHO ought be compassion moderated by logic, not vice versa, although this is true either way): no.

Supposedly non emotionally you could start to decide who has a right to live based on certain criteria, However one of the major advantages of the human species is our ability to use emotion WITH reason. How do you decide what is contributing? Is it being in full-time employment? is it earning over a set income? is it producing something tangible? What of intangibles like art? Who has the right to set the boundaries?

Surely the moment we start to impliment these sort of structures on a human society, we start to lose the essence of our humanity. Huxley springs to mind instantly reading some of these posts, do we simply decide that when one has reached the end of the usefull period of their life they are euthanised? Who would willingly walk to their own death happy that they are relieving society of a burden?

While the term "retards" carries a certain stigma & is a wide catch-all for a variety of defects, who is to define a "retard"? Is it the fat kid? the one with freckles? the ginger? glasses? one arm? cerebral palsy? downs? Does a child with downs for example not still provide joy to a parent when they learn? certainly they can be a strain but at the end you have a human being and the society that demands contributions must alsoprovide benefits to its members.

"Society" has no right to demand the contribution of a parent, yet deny that parent their child because the child is a "retard".

I know the OP wanted this thread to be emotionless, but thats just removing the most important dimension, I suspect to try to garner concurrence with his own opinions.

I belive that no-one has the right to euthanise a human being because of a defect, regardless of the severity. However, I do believe parents have a right to know about the posiblity of a birth defect prior to the birth of their child, largely due to the impact of a disabled child. The irony doesnt escape me. Dont worry.

There are certainly people that I belive society would be better off without, but they arent "retards" in the sense the OP intended. Someone who molests a child for exaple, not only will not contribute to society but has proven that they can detract from society as a whole and the victim individually, is surely a better candidate for removal than someone with diminished mental/physical capabilities.




One exception to the above post: reading my above comments I realise I am all for the euthanasia of gingers. everyone has suffered at the hands of a ginge, they offer nothing and contribute only thier filthy diseased genes to the pool, should they ever summon enough social skills and hold their temper long enough to successfully mate with another ginge, or god forbid a "normal". END GINGER TERROR NOW!!

vedds wrote:

One exception to the above post: reading my above comments I realise I am all for the euthanasia of gingers. everyone has suffered at the hands of a ginge, they offer nothing and contribute only thier filthy diseased genes to the pool, should they ever summon enough social skills and hold their temper long enough to successfully mate with another ginge, or god forbid a "normal". END GINGER TERROR NOW!!

No dude No
Ginger birds are the filthiest birds to go with.  I've been lucky enough to date 3 of these carrot tops and all three of them were extremely quick at getting down to business, very eager to please, and loved it up them (sorry can't think of a politer way of phrasing that bit)
So NO NO NO to the culling of gingers

depends on what kind of handicap you mean, theres far too types of mental handicap and its far too broad a term for you to  simply say "mentally handicapped"

Last edited by sfarrar33 (2006-10-24 05:49:22)

^AgentHawk wrote:

http://img283.imageshack.us/img283/3136/file000zv3.jpg

http://img346.imageshack.us/img346/1417/file001ba7.jpg

http://img305.imageshack.us/img305/1548/file002mu6.jpg

http://img324.imageshack.us/img324/3160/file003ac8.jpg

http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/7444/file004cu1.jpg

http://img342.imageshack.us/img342/1865/file005zp6.jpg

That's some rock. Be proud of it. It has lots of pretty pictures painted on it. Nice colours.

Agent Hawk - Those rocks I agree are special, I can't think of too much like that here in the Uk but I stand to be corrected.  Im avery proud Welsh man who finds himself asking "Whats so Great about Britian" ?

I see where your coming from regarding the end of this thread at the moment I havent too much to add.

Out of interest are the pictures just of the one rock?  Is it in Washington or anywhere significant?

1927 wrote:

Agent Hawk - Those rocks I agree are special, I can't think of too much like that here in the Uk but I stand to be corrected.  Im avery proud Welsh man who finds himself asking "Whats so Great about Britian" ?

I see where your coming from regarding the end of this thread at the moment I havent too much to add.

Out of interest are the pictures just of the one rock?  Is it in Washington or anywhere significant?

one rock in the middle of know where painted by Ray "Bubba" SorensenII. It's on the side of highway...ahhh, I can't remmber...sorry :p

Has nobody here seen the Jerry Springer show???  These people you talk of destroying are not just mere retards, they are entertainers.  They are the Fred Savages and Sean Penns of day time T.V. 

Watch Jerry Springer and you will see that they infact contribute more to society than you, Mister fat ass who lives in his mom's basement, smokes pot, surfs porn, and play's computer games because he couldn't get laid if he crawled up a chicken's ass.

Yeah, I'm talking to YOU.  (and quit picking your nose)

Spark wrote:

Holy. Fuck.

I think I shall go throw up now. Seriously. People.

There is NO FUCKING EXCUSE for this fucking viewpoint that you can fucking kill people on the basis that they are 'not contributing to society'.

There is NO FUCKING EXCUSE for wanting to beat up or do whatever to a fucking child with a mental disorder until you have been in their position - or understood what they are suffering from and WHY they did it.

I finally found a post to summarize my disgust at this thread. Most likely I'll close it so most of you can go and see a psychiatrist about your problems.


Mcminty.

mcminty wrote:

I finally found a post to summarize my disgust at this thread. Most likely I'll close it so most of you can go and see a psychiatrist about your problems.


Mcminty.

There appears to be only a minority supporting genocide.

seriously though, as my first post may sound at first as if i support "genetic cleansing", all i wanted to bring up was "how do we deal with it without propogating the condition" (as most forms of mental/physical retardation are genetic)? I am surprised that the whole "kill 'em off" idea keeps surfacing.

kr@cker wrote:

I am surprised that the whole "kill 'em off" idea keeps surfacing.

Why not?  It seems to be the catch all response to Muslims, immigrants, crime and idiocy.  Why not disability?