chuyskywalker
Admin
+2,439|7065|"Frisco"

UBAR has been updated -- sorta.

The amount of raw content associated with putting together UBAR was a lot the first time around (for those that have managed to swamp through the Kits page) so when SF came out I knew it was time for something better.

In steps the BF2S Wiki.

The point of th wiki was that I wanted to be able to promote prominent members of the forums and helpful folks I can trust to help me get the information parsed and presented for consumation -- I couldn't do so much myself and still maintain the site and forums.

I need to say that RobinHood and the_heart_attack have been HEROS for their efforts in putting this together. I helped, but they are certainly to be credited for the mass production that went into producing the wiki as it stands right now.

That all said... the UBAR pages for kits and unlocks have not only been moved to the Wiki, but they have been seriously revamped and now include Special Forces.

- BF2S Wiki Unlocks
- BF2S Wiki Classes

There are a slew of other updated bits of info all about the place on the Wiki -- I would suggest you take some time to browse about it and see what we're working on -- and please realize that it is most certainly a work in progress
Maj.Do
Member
+85|6969|good old CA
nice good job -- problem with the unlocks page.  the links are screwed. ex.  medic gun brings me to the F2000

please used the edit button next time -- chuy
TriggerHappy998
just nothing
+387|7065|-

Maj.Do wrote:

problem with the unlocks page.  the links are screwed. ex.  medic gun brings me to the F2000
Fixed.
kilroy0097
Kilroy Is Here!
+81|7061|Bryan/College Station, TX
Amazing work. Why go anywhere else? Thank guys for making this site even better.

Cheers.
"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis
bgthigfist
Member
+0|7022
God Bless You Chuy.
Paladus902
The Last Man Standing
+1|7004
Thanks guys, once again, a job well done, merry christmas!
']['onio
Member
+0|7059|France
No offence Chuy but I prefer how it was before.
The thing that I don't like is that you can't compare the weapons stats on the same page now.
THA
im a fucking .....well not now
+609|6988|AUS, Canberra

']['onio wrote:

No offence Chuy but I prefer how it was before.
The thing that I don't like is that you can't compare the weapons stats on the same page now.
oh no?
http://wiki.bf2s.com/weapons/comparison
midgetspy
Member
+3|7045
What is with the NSFW sig pics that fill 1/2 my entire screen? Pretty soon this'll end up like the tehsig forums...

Nic
chuyskywalker
Admin
+2,439|7065|"Frisco"

the_heart_attack wrote:

']['onio wrote:

No offence Chuy but I prefer how it was before.
The thing that I don't like is that you can't compare the weapons stats on the same page now.
oh no?
http://wiki.bf2s.com/weapons/comparison
And that one is complete, up-to-date, and includes SF weapon stats. And it links to the weapons. And it includes unlocks. And it's just f'ing awesome.
THA
im a fucking .....well not now
+609|6988|AUS, Canberra

midgetspy wrote:

What is with the NSFW sig pics that fill 1/2 my entire screen? Pretty soon this'll end up like the tehsig forums...

Nic
my sig is no longer that it ever was its jusy been made wider so im not sure why everyone is now having a cry?
Paladus902
The Last Man Standing
+1|7004
Lets try and stay on topic eh and not talk about your amazingly cool sig.

Possibly my favourite addition was when Wiki itself was added, its so useful when you need to try to look for something more specific than usual.  Its a great addition, I just hope we get the same good content all the time from the writers, its accurate and helpful.
']['onio
Member
+0|7059|France

chuyskywalker wrote:

the_heart_attack wrote:

']['onio wrote:

No offence Chuy but I prefer how it was before.
The thing that I don't like is that you can't compare the weapons stats on the same page now.
oh no?
http://wiki.bf2s.com/weapons/comparison
And that one is complete, up-to-date, and includes SF weapon stats. And it links to the weapons. And it includes unlocks. And it's just f'ing awesome.
Ok I forget to look at this one... But I still prefer the look of the previous page.
The MP7 is in the Shotguns section shouldn't it be in the SMGs?
Sgt.Gh0st
Pump-Action Pimp
+16|7000|The Hague, Holland
You guys care way more then EA .
fikraag7
j00baroni w/ l33t sauce
+1|6972

']['onio wrote:

chuyskywalker wrote:

the_heart_attack wrote:

oh no?
http://wiki.bf2s.com/weapons/comparison
And that one is complete, up-to-date, and includes SF weapon stats. And it links to the weapons. And it includes unlocks. And it's just f'ing awesome.
Ok I forget to look at this one... But I still prefer the look of the previous page.
The MP7 is in the Shotguns section shouldn't it be in the SMGs?
Ja...fixed

Sgt.Gh0st wrote:

You guys care way more then EA .
Of course we do...we actually play the game ... a little too much

Last edited by fikraag7 (2005-12-12 13:40:03)

']['onio
Member
+0|7059|France
Allready changed! Nice job guys
Now I have spoted another mistake; the SCAR-H is missing in the comparison page.
fikraag7
j00baroni w/ l33t sauce
+1|6972

']['onio wrote:

Allready changed! Nice job guys
Now I have spoted another mistake; the SCAR-H is missing in the comparison page.
We don't have any statistics on that gun...besides, you can't actually unlock that gun. It's only for the Navy SEALs on SF
THA
im a fucking .....well not now
+609|6988|AUS, Canberra

']['onio wrote:

Allready changed! Nice job guys
Now I have spoted another mistake; the SCAR-H is missing in the comparison page.
i think the spec forces only guns are still missing (3 of them)

but im saying this without going back to look at it.
fikraag7
j00baroni w/ l33t sauce
+1|6972

the_heart_attack wrote:

']['onio wrote:

Allready changed! Nice job guys
Now I have spoted another mistake; the SCAR-H is missing in the comparison page.
i think the spec forces only guns are still missing (3 of them)

but im saying this without going back to look at it.
Nah, they're there.
midgetspy
Member
+3|7045

the_heart_attack wrote:

midgetspy wrote:

What is with the NSFW sig pics that fill 1/2 my entire screen? Pretty soon this'll end up like the tehsig forums...

Nic
my sig is no longer that it ever was its jusy been made wider so im not sure why everyone is now having a cry?
Your sig is 700px by 338px of softcore porn, what a great addition to the forums. Without it I don't know what we'd do... other than be able to visit this site at school and work.

Nic
chuyskywalker
Admin
+2,439|7065|"Frisco"

midgetspy wrote:

Your sig is 700px by 338px of softcore porn, what a great addition to the forums. Without it I don't know what we'd do... other than be able to visit this site at school and work.
Take it to PM gentlemen -- you both know better than this.
midgetspy
Member
+3|7045
I thought it best left public so as to chance an official reply one way or the other, but I suppose I can ask for it... are there no rules for sigs? Can I have a 700x350 picture of goatse as my sig? Or could I make a huge sig out of lemonparty, just for kicks?

Nic
NM156
The H4xor Mod
+161|7064|North Texas
Go into your profile, and uncheck the "Show user signatures" option. Maybe create a browse-safe account you can use for school/work?
Kobrakai
Weirdo
+152|7006|England
softcore porn my ass, quit moaning about the picture, it owns. if anything it needs to be bigger...
midgetspy
Member
+3|7045
NM: OK thanks, good idea... I've turned sig images off.

Nic

Last edited by midgetspy (2005-12-12 19:48:54)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard