Darth_Rambo
Member
+22|7051|Raleigh, NC
What happened to the thread containing all the BF2142 Ranks?

Does anyone know what all the ranks are and the point requirments?
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7187|Alberta, Canada

My friend found the first four ranks and requirements:

Recruit Score: 0
Private Score: 40
Private 1st class Score: 68
Gunner Silver Score: 116

1 point for each kill, and no rank is more than 1000 points apart.

Last edited by ryan_14 (2006-08-29 11:45:56)

notorious
Nay vee, bay bee.
+1,396|7091|The United Center

ryan_14 wrote:

My friend found the first four ranks and requirements:

Recruit Score: 0
Private Score: 40
Private 1st class Score: 68
Gunner Silver Score: 116

1 point for each kill, and no rank is more than 1000 points apart.
One point for each kill you make from a vehicle and two points each if you're infantry, I believe.
manitobapaintballa
Member
+32|6963
beta ranks.............
Shem
sɥǝɯ
+152|6871|London (At Heart)

There are 40 ranks, therefore 40 unlocks.

And there is a complete list in the Beta forums, though I don't suppose we can tell you because of NDA.

However, I am rank 14. I rock.
majorassult
I <3 ak101
+307|7007|under there hayousaidunderwear

Shem wrote:

There are 40 ranks, therefore 40 unlocks.

And there is a complete list in the Beta forums, though I don't suppose we can tell you because of NDA.

However, I am rank 14. I rock.
how many points is that?
Capt. Foley
Member
+155|6932|Allentown, PA, USA
You gotta be bull shitting me, less points if your in a viechal? Fuck this, not buying it now, tired of all you whiney CS bitches, fuck you.
notorious
Nay vee, bay bee.
+1,396|7091|The United Center

Capt. Foley wrote:

You gotta be bull shitting me, less points if your in a viechal? Fuck this, not buying it now, tired of all you whiney CS bitches, fuck you.
Am I the only one who finds it ironic that he calls everyone else whiney bitches while he is whining and bitching?
travisb05
bullseye (+)
+58|7043|U.S

Capt. Foley wrote:

You gotta be bull shitting me, less points if your in a viechal? Fuck this, not buying it now, tired of all you whiney CS bitches, fuck you.
Good leave it for all the cool un whiney people to play
Shem
sɥǝɯ
+152|6871|London (At Heart)

ThomasMorgan wrote:

ryan_14 wrote:

My friend found the first four ranks and requirements:

Recruit Score: 0
Private Score: 40
Private 1st class Score: 68
Gunner Silver Score: 116

1 point for each kill, and no rank is more than 1000 points apart.
One point for each kill you make from a vehicle and two points each if you're infantry, I believe.
Negative, 1 point a kill, 1 point a revive, hell, one point an everything!
MuseSeeker
2142 Soldier: Behenaut
+110|7119|EUR

Capt. Foley wrote:

You gotta be bull shitting me, less points if your in a viechal? Fuck this, not buying it now, tired of all you whiney CS bitches, fuck you.
lol @ you, why should you be rewarded equall points then us when you are in a safer mode of play?
majorassult
I <3 ak101
+307|7007|under there hayousaidunderwear

Shem wrote:

ThomasMorgan wrote:

ryan_14 wrote:

My friend found the first four ranks and requirements:

Recruit Score: 0
Private Score: 40
Private 1st class Score: 68
Gunner Silver Score: 116

1 point for each kill, and no rank is more than 1000 points apart.
One point for each kill you make from a vehicle and two points each if you're infantry, I believe.
Negative, 1 point a kill, 1 point a revive, hell, one point an everything!
aww I want it to be more points for infantry....
Lucien
Fantasma Parastasie
+1,451|6997
you get more points for working as a squad though.

Also the next beta is out already.. for certain people
https://i.imgur.com/HTmoH.jpg
majorassult
I <3 ak101
+307|7007|under there hayousaidunderwear

SargeV1.4 wrote:

you get more points for working as a squad though.

Also the next beta is out already.. for certain people
?
Superior Mind
(not macbeth)
+1,755|7037
yeah, ?
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|7034|Tampa Bay Florida

Capt. Foley wrote:

You gotta be bull shitting me, less points if your in a viechal? Fuck this, not buying it now, tired of all you whiney CS bitches, fuck you.
Now I know why you don't post in the Debate and Serious section more often.......
starman7
Member
+15|7069
Actually, I would say that armor needs to be given more points overall.  Why poop around in a tank which takes half a minute to repair, takes quite a bit to kill another tank, and no longer has a co-ax MG to kill infantry when you can do stuff like medic whore?  And EMP + C-7/rocket ambushes will make tanks even more vulnerable to infantry.
BoomBox
Member
+3|6801|Israel

starman7 wrote:

Actually, I would say that armor needs to be given more points overall.  Why poop around in a tank which takes half a minute to repair, takes quite a bit to kill another tank, and no longer has a co-ax MG to kill infantry when you can do stuff like medic whore?  And EMP + C-7/rocket ambushes will make tanks even more vulnerable to infantry.
You have a point there...
But I still love infantry only
majorassult
I <3 ak101
+307|7007|under there hayousaidunderwear

starman7 wrote:

Actually, I would say that armor needs to be given more points overall.  Why poop around in a tank which takes half a minute to repair, takes quite a bit to kill another tank, and no longer has a co-ax MG to kill infantry when you can do stuff like medic whore?  And EMP + C-7/rocket ambushes will make tanks even more vulnerable to infantry.
b/c tanks dont take much skill.
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|7034|Tampa Bay Florida

majorassult wrote:

starman7 wrote:

Actually, I would say that armor needs to be given more points overall.  Why poop around in a tank which takes half a minute to repair, takes quite a bit to kill another tank, and no longer has a co-ax MG to kill infantry when you can do stuff like medic whore?  And EMP + C-7/rocket ambushes will make tanks even more vulnerable to infantry.
b/c tanks dont take much skill.
typo, you accidentally added a "much"
majorassult
I <3 ak101
+307|7007|under there hayousaidunderwear

Spearhead wrote:

majorassult wrote:

starman7 wrote:

Actually, I would say that armor needs to be given more points overall.  Why poop around in a tank which takes half a minute to repair, takes quite a bit to kill another tank, and no longer has a co-ax MG to kill infantry when you can do stuff like medic whore?  And EMP + C-7/rocket ambushes will make tanks even more vulnerable to infantry.
b/c tanks dont take much skill.
typo, you accidentally added a "much"
no typo...i am saying the tanks take a little skill but not to much skill.
Disodium
Member
+13|6858|Sydney
Infantry have to worry about:
All other infantry kits
- Organised Squads or Lone wolfs & random squads
All air craft
All other vechiles
- Newbie or Veteran dont take much to do some road kill
Mounted weapons


Tanks have to worry about:
Only kits with AT equipment.
Only aircraft with AT weapons & generally only those that can use it correctly.
Other armour but generally only if the skill of the opponents commander or the pilot is decent.
Organised Squads the ones that actually change kit to coordinate with the situation.
Only AT mounted weapons.

In my opinion tankers have alot less to worrie about.
Not every kits has AT weapons, not all aircraft has AT weaponry, Not every vechile has AT weaponry, Not all mounted turrents/guns are able to damage armour.

Rewarding someone for hiding in a tin anymore then they are is silly.

It doesnt take alot to use a tank, yes you can become 'skilled' at it by deploying tactics in the right situations but that only strengthens the fact that tankers are in a more controllable environment then infantry.

Last edited by Disodium (2006-08-29 19:13:02)

Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|7034|Tampa Bay Florida

Disodium wrote:

Infantry have to worry about:
All other infantry kits
- Organised Squads or Lone wolfs & random squads
All air craft
All other vechiles
- Newbie or Veteran dont take much to do some road kill
Mounted weapons


Tanks have to worry about:
Only kits with AT equipment.
Only aircraft with AT weapons & generally only those that can use it correctly.
Other armour but generally only if the skill of the opponents commander or the pilot is decent.
Organised Squads the ones that actually change kit to coordinate with the situation.
Only AT mounted weapons.

In my opinion tankers have alot less to worrie about.
Not every kits has AT weapons, not all aircraft has AT weaponry, Not every vechile has AT weaponry, Not all mounted turrents/guns are able to damage armour.

Rewarding someone for hiding in a tin anymore then they are is silly.

It doesnt take alot to use a tank, yes you can become 'skilled' at it by deploying tactics in the right situations but that only strengthens the fact that tankers are in a more controllable environment then infantry.
What do you think about my idea :

Tanks require 2 people : A driver, who drives the main body and gets a machine gun, and a gunner, who gets to control the turret gun and machine gun.  And a second gunner is optional.

I really think that would solve the problem...... if tanks required 2 players to man it wouldn't be such a simple vehicle.
major
Member
+14|6825
yea I might be wrong I might come back and change it but then after 216 is like 328, 501, then like 728.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard