BF2S Forums Marrage is pretty much a shame anyway

Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-12 02:20:05)

Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-12 02:53:59)

Bigwrm wrote:

Cougar wrote:

Xietsu wrote:

Dude, is this not resemblant of a needless hatred that is so shunned from the modern, ethical perspective? How could one possibly produce such a whacko fucking perspective? You present nothing other than fearful bias rooted in superficiality. Absolutely, god damn pathetic. Just because another human has developed varying preferences for satisfaction and enjoyment by no means constitutes that another defends these as there own, but merely that this defender respects their right to be what they are and to make the choices that they have. All in all, I can only say that you're indeed a pitiful heap of human.

Well by that logic, I'm entitled to my opinion of hating faggots just as you are entitled to your opinion of being one.  Developed varying preferences?  MEN WHO CRAM THEIR COCKS IN OTHER MENS ASSHOLES ARE NOT DISPLAYING A VARIED PREFERENCE, THEIR SICK!  I respect NOTHING in respect to homosexuality, IMHO they are scum, just like in your honest opinion I'm a worthless pile of flesh, but at least I'm not a worthless pile of flesh that goes to bed every night with Johnny Numbnuts laying next to me with a boner.

The fact that homosexuals are accepted in modern society is proof of our declining morality and desensitivity to things that are just not right.  The fact that people like you defend them, I find to be frankly disturbing.

(P.S. Unlike Xietsu, I'm man enough to leave my fucking name after I neg someone, instead of hiding like a bitch in anonymity.)

Would you fuck a girl in the ass?  And you are a homophobe.  Bottom line.

Xietsu wrote:

[pWa]Recon wrote:

your system is weak... nuff said.... and the fact that you started in Feb. building a rig, and you are now waiting on the last part, tells me cougar does make more then you. lol.... oh well.... when you get to get a real job, and leave McD's alone, then you may be able to build a machine without the help of mommy's and daddy's money.

p4 extreme 3.46gig dual core
4gig ddr2 Crucial 667 -PC2 5300 ECC 5-5-5-12 1.8v
2 WD Raptor 74gig 10,000 rpm hds in raid0 - 4 wd 500gig hds 7400rpm
MSI P4N Diamond Motherboard
2x Geforce 7800GTX 256m in sli
creative sound blaster X-Fi elite 7.1 channel
thermaltake armor case
thermaltake pure power w0073ru atx 520w

now i am done with this thread... it bores me.

LoL. Come on, you couldn't spot my mistake? How obvious is it that a wait for a part would NOT SPAN 10 FREAKING MONTHS? >_<'...hahahaha...

I meant "with my last weetle piece o' hardware having come in on March". You should've at least nailed me on making such a mistake man, geesh. But hey...I had been up for quite a damn while when I wrote that post. Nonetheless, sad that you're making an association between such a refuted point, all the while falling back on your baseless, juvenile assumptions. Hmm, I suppose it would be a good point now to point out that, throughout human development, universal parallels are always with prevalence (you know, typical idiot, yadda' yadda', no defense in the realm of logical analysis, irrelevant attacks).

(P.S. Oi, I left out my sound card. It's jussa' X-Fi Platinum. Do you guys notice anything odd, in particular, with Recon's inference that I have somehow challenged him in the battle of "tech superiority"? Yeah...last sentence of my paragraph here...IT HOHLDZZ TROOFZ [ECKSTREEMLEI EVIHDENT IHN NAYCHER].)

Bubbalo wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Before I begin, the sentence above, as a flimsy insult, decreases my urge to debate with you in any serious manner. But as you've gone to obvious trouble to clip my post into tiny pieces, I thought I'd go ahead and make this charade even more obscure.

Oh, that wasn't an insult.  That was just me wondering how you could get your reading comprehension so completely wrong.  It doesn't sound like you could be that stupid.

...and on...and on...and on...and on...and on...

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-06-13 01:59:30)

Rosse_modest wrote:

What's a marrage? Is it sort of like a barrage?

cpt.fass1 wrote:

Epic post from Shawn, Dan...

Bob Dole - divorced the mother of his child, who had nursed him through the long recovery from his war wounds.

Newt Gingrich - divorced his wife who was dying of cancer.

Dick Armey - House Majority Leader - divorced

Sen. Phil Gramm of Texas - divorced

Gov. John Engler of Michigan - divorced

Gov. Pete Wilson of California - divorced

George Will - divorced

Sen. Lauch Faircloth - divorced

Rush Limbaugh - Rush and his current wife Marta have six marriages and four divorces between them.

Rep. Bob Barr of Georgia - Barr, not yet 50 years old, has been married three times. Barr had the audacity to author and push the "Defense of Marriage Act." The current joke making the rounds on Capitol Hill is "Bob Barr...WHICH marriage are you defending?!?

Sen. Alfonse D'Amato of New York - divorced

Sen. John Warner of Virginia - divorced (once married to Liz Taylor.)

Gov. George Allen of Virginia - divorced

Ronald Reagan - divorced the mother of two of his children to marry Nancy Reagan, who bore him a daughter only 7 months after the marriage.

Henry Kissinger - divorced

Rep. Helen Chenoweth of Idaho - divorced

Sen. John McCain of Arizonia - divorced

Rep. John Kasich of Ohio - divorced

Rep. Susan Molinari of New York - Republican National Convention Keynote Speaker - divorced

So.......homosexuals are going to destroy the institution of marriage? Wait a minute, it seems the Christian Heterosexual Republicans are doing a fine job without anyone's help!

If you agree, like I do, that hypocricy and bigotry must end, repost this.

Bubbalo wrote:

Before I begin, I have to ask: what the hell are you on?

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

So you're pretty much saying that it's a terrible, rotten thing...marriage.

Where did I say that?  I merely said that the idea that marriage should be limited to certain unions to protect it's sanctity because divorce is already so commonplace.

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

I'm afraid that's a matter of opinion,

Well duh.

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

and there are more important things to do in the world than to abolish marriage, no matter how horrible anyone thinks it is.

Who talking about abolishing marriage?

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

The idea that an increase in a particular activity reduces its importance is silly.  In an extreme scenario, if government buildings being bombed in your country suddenly became "incredibly commonplace," would you assign to them reduced importance? Just because minimart stick-ups are a commonplace activity doesn't mean I'd rush out to do it. If one of my friends jumped off of a bridge, I wouldn't follow them. And if I was married, I wouldn't rush headlong into a divorce just because other people are doing it.

Actually, when something happens more often the effect is reduced.  Look at countries where murder is commonplace, and compare the reaction of the populace to the reaction in a country where it rarely happens.  Seriously, this whole paragraph is outright wrong.  There's not any question about it, at all.

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Do I have to explain and iterate every one of my posts in utmost detail to you?

Actually, you do have to iterate every one of your posts.  Otherwise noone can read them.  I find it funny that you criticise my comprehension when you're the one who doesn't seem to have understood anything I've said.