Fred[OZ75] wrote:
First we've really pissed of the Yanks and they ain't interested in; talking to their satellites for a third of the time (Pine Gap), or want the back up submarine communication system (Exmouth), or the only really friendly port for their nuclear ships in the Indian ocean(Garden Island, WA) so we can't count on any help from them.
Oh, they'll back us up. New Zealand will only give safe haven to ships they know aren't nuclear, and the US refuses to say which are and which aren't. They need their south east Asian outpost.
Fred[OZ75] wrote:
they are going to land in the north and face a huge desert to get to the populated areas.
Which is exactly why Japan had decided early on that they would never invade Australia. This is a particular problem for Indonesia as their military outnumbers us, but is less skilled.
Fred[OZ75] wrote:
As Rommel found out (and the Italians before him, and the Turks before them) taking on Australian troops in a desert is not much fun
I would argue that was due more to situation and strategy than environs, the Australians were well suited to an isolated, defensive role.
Fred[OZ75] wrote:
Not least of all the Australian people, I'm quite sure there would be plenty of experienced bush men with rifles taking pot shots at the advancing army also, laying traps, blowing things up (i.e. sources of water).
It would also be interesting to see how the city dwellers reacted (i.e. would the trimmings of modern society have made them soft, or would it be just as bloody as the urban fighting in poorer nations)
Fred[OZ75] wrote:
As you may have guessed ain't too worried about Indonesia yet... wait till they have nukes and I'll worry.
Oh, I don't think they could successfully invade and occupy Australia (if they could they would have done so already), I just thought anzus assessment was a bit optimistic.