DesertFox- wrote:
No one says twenty-nine/nine or nine/twenty-nine. But people do say September 29, hence mm/dd.
Bad habit imo. Some things that are fine in speech don't transcribe well to text, in this case when changed from a name to a number no matter the dialectal standard. It wouldn't be so bad if Americans
consistently followed the rule of month-before-day in writing and it would be just another of the country's cute little (predictable) quirks, but it's a complete free-for-all even before international communication.
Dilbert_X wrote:
Filename YY THIS IS THE LATEST IGNORE THE OTHERS
and the less-than-spectacular sequels:
Filename YY THIS IS THE LATEST IGNORE THE OTHERS - Copy
1Filename YY THIS IS THE LATEST IGNORE THE OTHERS - Copy (2)
Filename YY THIS IS THE LATEST IGNORE THE OTHERS(2) - Copy (2) revised (use this version)
Filename YY THIS IS THE LATEST IGNORE THE OTHERS(2) - Copy (2) revised (use this version) - Copy (2)
Filename YY THIS IS THE LATEST IGNORE THE OTHERS(2) - Copy (2) revised (use this version) - Copy (2) fixed
and the most recent timestamp on file, created from
1: Filename YY THIS IS THE LATEST IGNORE THE OTHERS - Copy (2) - latest
pending a completely new write-up from scratch, covering the same ground twice because nobody can figure out what's what.
"fw:fw:re:fw:fw ignore the version i sent five minutes ago, that was an edit of the older file because the way jim wrote it i thought it was apr 3's but it was revised mar 4."