Dilbert_X wrote:
So how did your arrest for class a drug possession not get flagged in your Korea visa application?
Most strange no?
because i was arrested on SUSPICION of class A drugs. not 'for class A drug possession'. they can't possibly know or confirm what a person has when they find an anonymous white powder on a home call until its tested with reagents or at a lab. you absolute mong. it's not like sniffer dogs are trained in advance to recognise novel research chemicals, or that they'd been surveilling my phone for weeks and rumbled my underground cocaine dealing empire, equipped with a warrant and knowing exactly what they're looking for. they found an unidentified white powder in my room. how can you nick someone for 'class A' when you don't know what the fuck it is? why not nick them for 'class B', considering how much info they have? 'class C'? throw a dart at a board? christ dilbert. the key word, and all they needed to enable them to take me into custody, was SUSPICION of.
you can't hold someone in a jail cell for days or weeks whilst a lab returns its standard battery of tests or chromatography results or whatever. drug possession is a criminal offence but the UK legal system has rules about keeping people custody in jail for the vast majority of offences without there being any charges. derp. they had to bail me the next morning even with a drugs charge pending. as i said: i wasn't taken in under the terror act, they couldn't detain me indefinitely.
the substance they seized from my place was as legal as sugar and salt. ergo: no possession charges for anything. i got a results and confirmation letter about 3 weeks later, when i was back at home, informing me that the drugs charge had accordingly been dropped, and that was the end of my entire legal travail. no lasting records or consequences. fin. definitely nothing about knives or assaulted girlfriends.
nothing ever was mentioned about 'breach of the peace'. i've never mentioned the phrase or the offence once in all my acres of text on the incident. that's because it's total nonsense. something you seized upon all of 3 days ago.
why would it be right to keep a police record, to show up on visa applications and career background checks for the rest of one's life, when that person wasn't actually in possession of anything illegal?
you are literally fucking hopeless man. do not change your day-job. the Bar Association is not waiting for your esteemed presence.
You're incoherent and contradicting yourself, get a grip.
i'm not working with children in a school, hence i didn't have to submit an enhanced CRB. but, with regards the usual CRB, any cautions or fines or charges absolutely would show up. IF i was waving around a knife and 'threatening my girlfriend', that would be on my record. you don't skip out of jail the next morning to return back to your same residential property that you share with the 'victim', if you've been nicked for brandishing a lethal weapon. for fuck's sake use your head!
nothing showed about my 'arrest' for drugs because i was in possession of a totally legal substance. as is entirely proper. in what possible justifiable public interest is it to know what i got up to with perfectly legal substances? use. your. head.
Last edited by uziq (2022-09-26 07:43:01)