scotus doesnt work in total secrecy. their opinions get published, this is a working draft duh. leaks do not happen at the judicial level, since ya know, lawyers/judges should keep shit confidential. this destroys any trust in the system.SuperJail Warden wrote:
A lot of melodrama. The right wingers upset about the leak would be doing the exact opposite if there was a leak confirming the SCOTUS planned to uphold RvW. As would I probably.Cybargs wrote:
it is unheard of. some clerk is going to get fired/thrown in jail.SuperJail Warden wrote:
NYT said such a leak hasn't happened in decades.
At this point why should the SCOTUS be immune from the same political forces everyone else needs to suffer under? It is not enough that they have lifetime appointments and are the final authority on law in this country. They must also be allowed to work in total secrecy?
"You guys realize states can still decide to outlaw guns, right? All this does is make it decided by states"KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
"You guys realize states can still decide to outlaw slavery, right? All this does is make it decided by states".
You're dumb dude
yep the yale law school prof (who was also a SC clerk) speculated the same in my linked twitter link above.Cybargs wrote:
fyi theres a theory the leak was done by a conservative justice to strengthen the decision, the leak to politico was to a former fox nat security reporter... not a court reporter at any of the other major papers.
But moving interstate can't be done.SuperJail Warden wrote:
The weirdest conservatives are the ones who live in NY state and California but hate the major cities of their state. That is Jay. Taking the train everyday into the city of LGBT, CRT, and hipsters.
Sorry but I'm not using a platform owned by a nerd who doesn't know he's not cooluziq wrote:
yep the yale law school prof (who was also a SC clerk) speculated the same in my linked twitter link above.
I'm glad there's a rapist on the supreme court, rapists never get fair representation and I bet most rapists vote republican.a leak of this kind doesn't benefit the liberals/pro-abortion side in any way. it only cements the majority justices' in their draft opinions, lest they should be seen to vacillate and undermine the court's internal process.
Moving or traveling to another state to find abortion provider is a tax on the poor.Dilbert_X wrote:
But moving interstate can't be done.SuperJail Warden wrote:
The weirdest conservatives are the ones who live in NY state and California but hate the major cities of their state. That is Jay. Taking the train everyday into the city of LGBT, CRT, and hipsters.
Do you know hard it is to get your HVAC certificate reaccredited? Its literally impossible.
Also did I post my moving card before?
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/P2NJ04B7VaEunnamednewbie13 wrote:
Maybe pregnant women can find god while hiking up the long abandoned railways with bindles over their shoulders. Experience Christian realizations in their suffering and change their minds about terminating their rape cell or ectopic pregnancy tumors.
The poor should be taxed to encourage them to get rich and pay less tax.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Moving or traveling to another state to find abortion provider is a tax on the poor.
"It's contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and their grandparents to live a decent life," Ginsburg said, according to Couric's recording from the 2016 sitdown. "Which they probably could not have lived, in the places they came from … As they become older they realize that this was a youthful folly. And that's why education is important."
