i eat meat 2 or 3 times a week and i take international flights – not holidays – maybe once every 5 years. not superlative or model behaviour, but not exactly selfish. i imagine your weekly fuel consumption and use of a car probably outweighs my flight patterns, chap. flying to korea is by far the most carbon-costly thing i've done in 30 years on this planet. i haven't owned a car or commuted in a personal vehicle in my entire life. how are you doing on that score? and, again, didn't your entire family make the trip from the UK to australia? as well as living in possibly multiple countries before that as well? not sure how you can gipp me for making one relocation in my life when your ENTIRE family unit have made SEVERAL. dipshit.
pretending that 'steak' is the problem is pretty funny, considering the immense ecological costs of vegetarian lifestyles too. how's all those soy crop monocultures doing for the planet? keep eating tofu and telling yourself that you're a saint, immaculate as the conception. i'm sure you only buy locally sourced organic vegetables and not, er, internationally sourced produce in normal grocery stores. your food is definitely carbon neutral.
... we could be here a while.
my point being, dumbass, that you disproportionately focus on the behaviour of individual consumers, as if family holidays are melting the planet. they are not. if you focussed a similar level of energy and anger/ire at the real, substantive causes of climate change, then maybe your moral crusade would be coherent and have a point. instead you seem to think that if everyone stopped buying fuel from shell and going to ibiza each summer, the world would be saved. meanwhile you wear hugely environmentally destructive cotton clothes, live in a house made of concrete, drive a car an hour each way to the beach, use electricity from a grid powered in part by fossil fuels ... i could go on. you have just posted here TWICE in the last month about your shoes, imported from a supply chain involving india, and a gun part, which i'm sure was highly essential, from fucking florida. what's the bigger contributor to greenhouse gases? tourist flights or, you know, INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING AND SUPPLY CHAINS? you dumb fuck!
all i am saying is that it requires systemic change, which is normally only possible at the level of government fiat, and in this case on the level of international, top-down collaboration. it requires Big Thinking. your analysis and 'criticisms' are constantly levelled at the lowest-rung of consumer behaviour, which makes a marginal difference to global warming. you think nothing of purchasing things online that have to be sent around the entire globe on a cargo ship, or, ironically, in the cargo-hold of a passenger airliner (as indeed 60% of all international air freight is shipped). then you criticize tourists. LMAO. you are really not very smart on this topic.
Last edited by uziq (2021-10-30 23:59:41)