Rural counties in Oregon voted to join conservative Idaho. Do these poor people in rural Oregon know they won't be able to smoke?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4641/f4641c3f3cd6a12c406ede6a6966bc24e10ab7e7" alt="https://www.rollingstone.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Weed_Map_Final_4.19.jpg?resize=1800,1200&w=1800"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/178bd/178bdb685e9557700e121c23c5aa2885409358b0" alt="https://i.imgur.com/xsoGn9X.jpg"
Classic dodge though, suggest without saying that unauthorized people are voting en masse rather than admit that voting shouldn't be made more difficult, time-consuming; or condemn the practice of targeting specific districts to make voting inconvenient.Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) ― whose condemnation of Donald Trump’s election lies made her an enemy in her own party ― showed she still has an allegiance to the GOP. (Watch the video below.)
Cheney, who was purged from House leadership this month because of her Trump criticism, suggested to Axios in an interview broadcast on HBO Sunday that she did not see a cause-and-effect between the GOP’s false cries of cheating in swing states and Republican-led voter suppression measures.
“You don’t see any linkage between Donald Trump saying the election was stolen to Republicans and all these state legislatures rushing to put in place restrictive voter laws?” journalist Jonathan Swan asked.
Cheney dodged a direct response, but Swan pressed, noting it was not a coincidence that Republicans intensified their drive against voting after critical election losses. Then Cheney went full mealy-mouth:
“Everybody should want a situation and system where people who ought to be able to vote and have the right to vote can vote, and people who don’t, shouldn’t,” she said.
Last edited by War Man (2021-06-03 07:27:27)
KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
I hope he dies before 2024.
That lady is annoy. I prefer the drop out from Colorado, Lauren B.RTHKI wrote:
I hope he wins then dies the we can have President Marjorie Taylor Greene
A Florida high-rise that collapsed early Thursday was determined to be on unstable land a year ago, according to a researcher at Florida International University.
The building, which was constructed in 1981, has been sinking at an alarming rate since the 1990s, according to a study in 2020 by Shimon Wdowinski, a professor in the Department of Earth and Environment.
When Wdowinski saw the news that the Champlain Towers South condominium in Surfside collapsed, he instantly remembered it from the study, he said.
“I looked at it this morning and said, ‘Oh my god.’ We did detect that,” he said.
Wdowinski said his research is not meant to suggest certainty about what caused the collapse. The building was sinking at a rate of about 2 millimeters a year in the 1990s and could have slowed or accelerated in the time since, he said.
In his experience, even the level of sinking observed in the 1990s typically results in impacts to buildings and their structures, Wdowinski said. He said that very well could have been the case for the Champlain building in the 1990s, based on his findings.
“It was a byproduct of analyzing the data. We saw this building had some kind of unusual movement,” Wdowinski said.
Daniel Dietch, who served as Surfside’s mayor from 2010 to 2020, warned against drawing conclusions too soon.
“This is an extraordinarily unusual event, and it is dangerous and counterproductive to speculate on its cause,” he said.
Last edited by SuperJail Warden (2021-06-27 13:32:53)