| baked/stirred | 0% | 0% - 0 | ||||
| benedict (or neptune/royale) | 9% | 9% - 1 | ||||
| boiled/steamed (including deviled) | 0% | 0% - 0 | ||||
| fried (sunny-side up/over-easy and/or flipped) | 27% | 27% - 3 | ||||
| in a basket | 9% | 9% - 1 | ||||
| omelette | 9% | 9% - 1 | ||||
| poached/coddled | 0% | 0% - 0 | ||||
| rancheros | 9% | 9% - 1 | ||||
| sandwich | 0% | 0% - 0 | ||||
| scrambled | 36% | 36% - 4 | ||||
| Total: 11 | ||||||
No, to say that would be racist.SuperJail Warden wrote:
If different breeds of dog have different inherent behaviors, does the same apply to people?
Yes, a few generations of selective breeding can produce entirely different animals, thousands of generations of natural selection in different environments in different corners of the planet can only ever produce exactly the same result.Larssen wrote:
It's not a bad question but it's a eugenics argument that has actually been made many times before. The variation and diversity among dogs isn't really comparable to people at all. Also, invariably, past attempts at selective breeding of humans never really produced the desired result. Some academic would have to explain or you might want to page uziq to reference an article or two, but the gist of it as I understand is we're entirely different species and the "rules" aren't the same. It's also a slippery slope that usually leads to wrong, pointless and needless racism.
Last edited by Larssen (2021-02-25 14:08:44)
Do you like egg salad?unnamednewbie13 wrote:
All dog breeds belong to the same species. All human "races" are the same species. They are not segmented along the same lines. Two Africans may be more genetically different than one of the Africans and a European. Two Europeans may also be genetically different, but belong to the same race. Race is a social construct, but breeds are not. Humans have not really experienced the wide level of artificial selection that dogs have. The two are not comparable, and for reasons that have nothing to do with PC culture.
Even if we were to start a worldwide program to measure stuff like intelligence based on (unscientific) race, the intelligence measurements would in their own terms be unscientific due to their inherent cultural bias. Any differentiation in the results wouldn't teach us anything, and would serve to reinforce bias.
How about them eggs, though?
You'd be the guy charging galileo with heresy.Dilbert_X wrote:
Yes, societies all over the world over thousands of years separately and independently developed the metric system.
Either evolution is a thing or it isn't - apparently you're the the one in the discussion who believes god did it.
Over the last decade or two Dilbert must've read this a million times. He can't bring himself to accept it, because his belief in racial divides has been incorporated as a part of his personality. It's not about facts and never was.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
All dog breeds belong to the same species. All human "races" are the same species. They are not segmented along the same lines. Two Africans may be more genetically different than one of the Africans and a European. Two Europeans may also be genetically different, but belong to the same race. Race is a social construct, but breeds are not. Humans have not really experienced the wide level of artificial selection that dogs have. The two are not comparable, and for reasons that have nothing to do with PC culture.
Even if we were to start a worldwide program to measure stuff like intelligence based on (unscientific) race, the intelligence measurements would in their own terms be unscientific due to their inherent cultural bias. Any differentiation in the results wouldn't teach us anything, and would serve to reinforce bias.
How about them eggs, though?
And yet different breeds are radically different, with radically different intrinsic behaviour and suitability for different tasks.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
All dog breeds belong to the same species.
See above.All human "races" are the same species.
Um no, you see the scientific process is 'observe evidence - formulate and test theory', you're using the process 'ignore evidence - parrot latest woke ideology', they really aren't the same thing.Larssen wrote:
You'd be the guy charging galileo with heresy.Dilbert_X wrote:
Yes, societies all over the world over thousands of years separately and independently developed the metric system.
Either evolution is a thing or it isn't - apparently you're the the one in the discussion who believes god did it.
oh my god you are fucking illiterate. read a high school biology textbook.Dilbert_X wrote:
No, to say that would be racist.SuperJail Warden wrote:
If different breeds of dog have different inherent behaviors, does the same apply to people?
Obviously Alsations, poodles and Chihuahuas have the exact same physical and behavioural characteristics, if you disagree you're a eugenicist.
your view of evolution is literally wrong. you’re arguing for something like a telos and ‘end’, a definite ‘progress’ and sense of advance. chronology for you is tied into some metaphysical sense of betterment.Dilbert_X wrote:
Yes, societies all over the world over thousands of years separately and independently developed the metric system.
Either evolution is a thing or it isn't - apparently you're the the one in the discussion who believes god did it.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2021-02-25 15:40:03)
Can't do deviled eggs, at least the way most people make them. I cannot for the life of me eat mass-produced mayonnaise, even if it's blended into an egg yolk. My mommy always makes me special deviled eggs when she makes them for large gatherings. God bless her heart.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Just finished outlining why they are != and reiterating the unscientific nature of races. Anyway take it to the race thread. This thread's all about
