uziq
Member
+493|3667

SuperJail Warden wrote:

uziq wrote:

makes about as much sense as saying south americans aren't like other christians.

i suggest you read some indonesian history. there's plenty of it in the 20th century.
Indonesian women are just like Filipino women but Muslim. Muslim girls from the Middle East are all prudish with the exception of the Christians from Lebanon and the Coptic ones.
https://media.giphy.com/media/jeXiz1RAvzX44/source.gif

Last edited by uziq (2020-02-11 15:08:08)

SuperJail Warden
Gone Forever
+640|3935
Do you know any Muslims girls in the U.K.?
https://i.imgur.com/xsoGn9X.jpg
uziq
Member
+493|3667
we've had this conversation so many times before.

e: i'm gonna redact the casanova stuff. but yes.

Last edited by uziq (2020-02-11 15:25:58)

SuperJail Warden
Gone Forever
+640|3935
Interesting. I will add this to my records.

How many terrorist attacks have Indonesians committed in your country?
https://i.imgur.com/xsoGn9X.jpg
uziq
Member
+493|3667
can you get to the point?

indonesia is an entirely representative modern muslim country. for dilbert to hold it up when he has been islamophobic in the extreme elsewhere in the context of the UK's 'failed multicultural' project, is pretty rich. he says islam is incompatible with our 'values' on the one hand for its exclusionary attitudes, and then elsewhere applauds that same intolerance when it suits him.

Last edited by uziq (2020-02-11 15:23:59)

SuperJail Warden
Gone Forever
+640|3935
Have you ever hooked up with a Muslim Arab? Can you quickly do the math on how many Arabs you have defiled compared to the amount of Arab terror attacks in the U.K.? Then compare both numbers to the Indonesians of both categories.

I have the time for you to do the math.
https://i.imgur.com/xsoGn9X.jpg
uziq
Member
+493|3667
are we really going to play the game of 'what's a real muslim' now? so only sunni arabs from the peninsula qualify. too bad pakistan, iran, the levant, all of turkey and turkic peoples, and indonesia. too bad north africa. macbeth Has A Notion and, not having seen any of the world or met any of these people, he Knows What A Muslim Is.

Last edited by uziq (2020-02-11 15:29:14)

SuperJail Warden
Gone Forever
+640|3935
Not all Muslims are the same. Arab Muslims have committed the most violence against Christian communities throughout history. In fact almost all Islamic violence on Christians has been committed by Arab Muslims.

That is not a criticism of Arabs either. I have a deep fondness for those poor innocent Christian Lebanese and the Coptic community. All I am saying is that you shouldn't say mean things about Indonesians who in my book are like Filipinos.
https://i.imgur.com/xsoGn9X.jpg
uziq
Member
+493|3667
i think you misinterpreted my post. i wasn't saying anything bad about indonesians. i regard them as a moderate example of islam. my point being that dilbert views the same islamic values through two lenses simultaneously, and contradictorily. he wants it both ways. muslims who won't tolerate modern western values in the UK: islam is bad. muslims who bully transgender people out of their own societies: great! go muslims!

it's almost as if all he really cares about at root is keeping his home country white, rather than any sort of 'lauded' value that the west supposedly holds.

Last edited by uziq (2020-02-11 15:42:47)

SuperJail Warden
Gone Forever
+640|3935
Well the Indonesians aren't committing any bad acts against western values when they do whatever it is they did to the trannies in your link. (I didn't read it). So Dilbert's views are consistent unless you are saying transgenderism and sexual confusion are western values?
https://i.imgur.com/xsoGn9X.jpg
uziq
Member
+493|3667
i would say that tolerance and pluralism are advertised on the marquee, yes.

https://d.ibtimes.co.uk/en/full/1475873/hermaphroditus.jpg
SuperJail Warden
Gone Forever
+640|3935
I find it disturbing you equate good honest hardworking gay people with gender dysphoria. Wasn't Nero's boyfriend a tranny? That is the first reference in western culture to that lifestyle from what I understand. How did the Praetorian Guard treat that man's illness? Who is more western than the Romans?
https://i.imgur.com/xsoGn9X.jpg
uziq
Member
+493|3667
the ancient greeks.

Last edited by uziq (2020-02-11 17:05:36)

SuperJail Warden
Gone Forever
+640|3935
The Greeks did practice homosexuality. And that's okay! Any instances you can recall of transgenderism among the ancient Greeks?
https://i.imgur.com/xsoGn9X.jpg
uziq
Member
+493|3667
the statue is of hermaphrodite, a mythical being with two sexes. so uuuuh ... ?
SuperJail Warden
Gone Forever
+640|3935
Mythical. Not real. The transformation was punishment.

Zeus turned into a Goose and had sex with a lady. The Greek condoned bestiality?
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/68/Leda_and_the_Swan%2C_After_Michelangelo.jpg/220px-Leda_and_the_Swan%2C_After_Michelangelo.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/xsoGn9X.jpg
uziq
Member
+493|3667
hermaphroditism was a practice/cult in ancient greece. the fact is the ancient world is full of examples of people skipping merrily over the two-genders line. they recognised the fluidity and performativity of gender. the roman elite loved to cross-dress and dress up in women's make-up, especially during performances and festivals. the ancient greeks practiced homosexuality, worshipped same-sex beauty and love, and held up androgyny (see, for example, alcibiades). that is in both a mythical-religious-cultic sense and in an ordinary sexual-erotic way.

the fact is a neat distinction between genders or sexuality didn't exist then. some of the senior roman poets and legislators, to come later in the republic, actively tried to decry against it as decadent -- but they could only make those arguments in the same way that you and dilbert can now. because it's self-evidently A Thing and had been practiced for hundreds, if not thousands, of years before that point.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,813|6321|eXtreme to the maX
Paedophilia has been practised for thousands of years, if gender-bending is OK why not child rape?
Fuck Israel
SuperJail Warden
Gone Forever
+640|3935

uziq wrote:

hermaphroditism was a practice/cult in ancient greece. the fact is the ancient world is full of examples of people skipping merrily over the two-genders line. they recognised the fluidity and performativity of gender. the roman elite loved to cross-dress and dress up in women's make-up, especially during performances and festivals. the ancient greeks practiced homosexuality, worshipped same-sex beauty and love, and held up androgyny (see, for example, alcibiades). that is in both a mythical-religious-cultic sense and in an ordinary sexual-erotic way.

the fact is a neat distinction between genders or sexuality didn't exist then. some of the senior roman poets and legislators, to come later in the republic, actively tried to decry against it as decadent -- but they could only make those arguments in the same way that you and dilbert can now. because it's self-evidently A Thing and had been practiced for hundreds, if not thousands, of years before that point.
You didn't answer my question about bestiality. Is it okay for a man to identify as a goose and have sex with one?
https://i.imgur.com/xsoGn9X.jpg
uziq
Member
+493|3667
because nobody is using 'it's been done for thousands of years' as the justification for its legal recognition. there are plenty of liberal legal interpretations that have seen the success and advancement of gay rights because, by our current legal and political philosophy, it does no harm to society or other individuals. for cases where the relationships involve adults and children, we have laws for that and, like all laws, they apply equally to all citizens. very simple.

macbeth asked 'who is more western than the romans'? well, vexing the ancients is a popular pastime for both the progressives and reactionaries of history.

it's ironic that a thread titled 'transgender people are now allowed into the military' is full fo alarmist rhetoric about homosexuality, transgenderism, etc. when the warriors of 2,500 years ago were, by most accounts, a merry bunch of bum-boys who grew their hair long and praised each other for womanly beauty just as soon as they vanquished their foes for their effeminacy. in other words: it's complicated, like human sexuality and gender itself.
uziq
Member
+493|3667

SuperJail Warden wrote:

uziq wrote:

hermaphroditism was a practice/cult in ancient greece. the fact is the ancient world is full of examples of people skipping merrily over the two-genders line. they recognised the fluidity and performativity of gender. the roman elite loved to cross-dress and dress up in women's make-up, especially during performances and festivals. the ancient greeks practiced homosexuality, worshipped same-sex beauty and love, and held up androgyny (see, for example, alcibiades). that is in both a mythical-religious-cultic sense and in an ordinary sexual-erotic way.

the fact is a neat distinction between genders or sexuality didn't exist then. some of the senior roman poets and legislators, to come later in the republic, actively tried to decry against it as decadent -- but they could only make those arguments in the same way that you and dilbert can now. because it's self-evidently A Thing and had been practiced for hundreds, if not thousands, of years before that point.
You didn't answer my question about bestiality. Is it okay for a man to identify as a goose and have sex with one?
you did two degrees in history and you can't tell the difference between mythical allegory involving gods and human beings? my point about hermaphroditism is that clearly ideas about people having bi- or interchangeable genders has been around for as long as western civilisation itself. you seemed to think the ancient time was clear of any trace of it. the idea is well-established. the myth is just one expression of it. i never claimed that the ancients went around imitating the behaviour of their pantheon. that was reserved for mad people like caligula.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,813|6321|eXtreme to the maX

uziq wrote:

by our current legal and political philosophy, it does no harm to society or other individuals. for cases where the relationships involve adults and children, we have laws for that and, like all laws, they apply equally to all citizens. very simple.
Barely a few years ago 'legal and political philosophy' did decree that homosexuality was wrong and socially corrosive.
I'll bet that adult men marrying 12 year olds has been far more prevalent over the centuries than homosexuality or transgenderism - child-marriage is practised all over the world right now.
Fuck Israel
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,813|6321|eXtreme to the maX

uziq wrote:

we've had this conversation so many times before.

e: i'm gonna redact the casanova stuff. but yes.
Your arguments about muslims make no sense at all, they weren't really observant muslims if they were partying with you were they?

"I met a nice jewish girl, she was fine with eating pork, sucking gentile dick and cosplaying as a nazi - seems jews are cool after all"

The point is across the world middle of the road conservative leaders see identity politics of all kinds being socially corrosive and leading to more intolerance instead of less.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2020-02-11 18:23:54)

Fuck Israel
uziq
Member
+493|3667
the difference being, one is a law that is not rationally or morally supportable; the other still makes moral sense.

to ban homosexuality wasn't based on any notion of harm, or justice; it was based on religious dogma (something i thought you were against), in the name of christian society and some misbegotten notion that forcing people to be straight and get married before having sex would ensure the preservation of the family (something else you're a little shaky on, dilbert).

to ban adults from marrying legal minors, who are not emotionally, psychologically or sexually developed, is based on a pretty reasonable sense of agency and personal responsibility.

amazing how the men of reason and science can become so conveniently befuddled when it suits them.

Last edited by uziq (2020-02-11 18:29:12)

uziq
Member
+493|3667

Dilbert_X wrote:

uziq wrote:

we've had this conversation so many times before.

e: i'm gonna redact the casanova stuff. but yes.
Your arguments about muslims make no sense at all, they weren't really observant muslims if they were partying with you were they?

"I met a nice jewish girl, she was fine with eating pork, sucking gentile dick and cosplaying as a nazi - seems jews are cool after all"

The point is across the world middle of the road conservative leaders see identity politics of all kinds being socially corrosive and leading to more intolerance instead of less.
do you think every muslim in indonesia or pakistan is 'observant'? is every christian in america or italy 'observant'?

my point has always been that, like the vast majority of the muslims in the UK, they are moderate, civil, normal people. their religion is part of their group identity, their family life, their traditions and holidays and rituals. they don't live their lives by the book. if that makes them bad muslims, sure, but there's a helluva lot of other religious people living in bad faith all over the world, too. it's a cultural heritage for many, not a day-by-day discipline.

you'd realise this pretty quickly if you ever met and socialised with a single muslim in your life. it's pretty normal and accepted, even in 'traditional' families, for the young members of the family to have a few years out, being students, growing up. it's much more tolerated with the young men, especially the oldest, than with the daughters, admittedly, but it's a tacit acknowledgment all the same.

Last edited by uziq (2020-02-11 18:28:13)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard