did he also reveal how he'd come by that info?He [Navalny] revealed...
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
did he also reveal how he'd come by that info?He [Navalny] revealed...
How did this guy come to be worth about GBP100m in about three years?uziq wrote:
we’ve had expenses scandals here, sure, and i’m sure a few MPs get taken out for dinner against the rules or offer to sit on a board they shouldn’t. however, we certainly don’t have a caste of oligarchs and mega-rich power players who cannot explain where their money came from please don’t even try and compare western and post-soviet corruption. it’s not exactly controversial to discuss the corporate-mafia days of russia after the collapse of the union.
ex-head of state parlays political retirement into multi-million pound career in corruption shocker! that’s like saying obama was corrupt during his time in office, haha.Dilbert_X wrote:
How did this guy come to be worth about GBP100m in about three years?uziq wrote:
we’ve had expenses scandals here, sure, and i’m sure a few MPs get taken out for dinner against the rules or offer to sit on a board they shouldn’t. however, we certainly don’t have a caste of oligarchs and mega-rich power players who cannot explain where their money came from please don’t even try and compare western and post-soviet corruption. it’s not exactly controversial to discuss the corporate-mafia days of russia after the collapse of the union.
Shahter wrote:
you shouldn't look at any media atm to get ideas about politics. journalism as a means of getting objective information - or, for that matter, even honest opinions - to people is dead in the world of global capitalism.uziq wrote:
you're right. we should look at the russian media to get a good idea about political opposition. western media definitely don't fact check!
edit: quote.
Last edited by uziq (2018-09-14 23:40:56)
Last edited by Finray (2018-09-15 00:47:04)
The Russian Foreign Ministry have said the only way Bellingcat could have got this information is via hacking, or paying of an insider, basically confirming that it's accurate...uziq wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/15/documents-show-novichok-salisbury-suspects-alexander-petrov-ruslan-boshirov-links-defence
you cannot seriously still deny this at this point
"uncovered by investigative journalists"... investigave who? ah, "journalists". you mean people who get paid to report whatever those paying them want reported? k.uziq wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/15/documents-show-novichok-salisbury-suspects-alexander-petrov-ruslan-boshirov-links-defence
you cannot seriously still deny this at this point
source? can't find any direct reference to anything like that in any media - western or russian - only "they said"'s.coke wrote:
The Russian Foreign Ministry have said the only way Bellingcat could have got this information is via hacking, or paying of an insider
nothing about russian foreign ministry saying anything about hacking and stuff there.uziq wrote:
https://theins.ru/politika/117161
Last edited by uziq (2018-09-16 06:29:14)
i do. how many among mass media companies are of that type?uziq wrote:
you do realise there are not-for-profit, volunteer organisations, right?
Last edited by uziq (2018-09-16 08:55:32)
Shahter wrote:
how many among mass media companies are of that type?
They tweeted it on the official Russian Foreign ministry twitterShahter wrote:
nothing about russian foreign ministry saying anything about hacking and stuff there.uziq wrote:
https://theins.ru/politika/117161
coke wrote:
They tweeted it on the official Russian Foreign ministry twitterShahter wrote:
nothing about russian foreign ministry saying anything about hacking and stuff there.uziq wrote:
https://theins.ru/politika/117161
i think i know what you talking about now. it's the post by zakharova in which she was moking bellingcat with their capabilities of digging up official info, right?coke wrote:
The Russian Foreign Ministry have said the only way Bellingcat could have got this information is via hacking, or paying of an insider, basically confirming that it's accurate...