Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6790

Miller wrote:

Wait, look at the irony here. People were and are still glad the US was hit on 9/11.  Then they will be willing to bitch about you child? There were children in the towers too!
The obvious point is that those children were complicit in the opression through capitalism of underprivilidged nations.

Miller wrote:

We send money to African governments but they are corrupt and use it for themselves not their people.
You also prevent food and medical supplies from entering nations like Cuba and Iraq.

Miller wrote:

OK, the USA has done its share trying to help the world.  Let's see all the others try on their own.
Oh, yes, waging wars certainly is helpful.
Fred[OZ75]
Jihad Jeep Driver
+19|6988|Perth, Western Australia
The UN is little more than a gathering of countries, it has no army of its own, and it really has no power except the power of the member countries. To blame the UN is pointless as it is not the answer to everything but it does give legitimacy to any action by one country to another by collective agreement of the community of countries it represents.

The UN can only highlight problems by bringing them to the world stage, without the UN there would be no forum for world issues, there would be no condemnation of militaristic countries abusing weaker nations. The UN can only approve or condemn what a country does it can’t make countries act, it is up to the individual countries to act.

An example would be East Timor, The UN and it’s agencies helped it vote for independence, the UN approved countries going in to settle the unrest after the vote, the UN helped set up a new government, and now the UN has approved countries entering the country again to settle it down. The UN couldn’t force Indonesia to allow a independence vote, the UN couldn’t enforce law and order in the country after the vote, the UN could only help form a government but couldn’t stop it from making mistakes leading to another peace-keeping force required… Only member countries can send troops and police for peace-keeping, only East Timor can form a decent government the UN can’t force one.

If you see injustice in the world don’t think the UN will fix it, lobby your government to do something, help a charity to do something, get on a plane and go help… Blaming the UN is pointless.

The UN is little more than an internationally governed charity with a large debating chamber for the world.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6790

rdx-fx wrote:

F*** Africa.  Too many of their countries have nothing but a 'Culture of Death'.  Quarantine the continent, until they decide they want to rejoin humanity.
Because the root of all their problems is Africa, not colonialist ambitions?  And besides, countries which move in tend to take a purely military approach, rather than also bringing in educators and such.  Military on it's own is *never* successful.
ReDmAn_ThE_uNiQuE
oh hai :D
+156|6880|The Netherlands

T0rr3nt wrote:

JimKong wrote:

$$$
couldnt have said it better myself.
€€€
Ty
Mass Media Casualty
+2,398|7003|Noizyland

UN forces don't attack. They are simply a presence. If the UN became the 'ultimate world power' it would give them too mcuh influence, especially over countries they officialy have no control over. The UN does all it can without going to war with the Somalian warlords.

Pretty sad though, that politics and power which are both ]ideas not material things, are deemed more important than legions of suffering people.
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6918|Tampa Bay Florida

Sh1fty2k5 wrote:

Good thing that little nigger died (negative karma HERE WE COME!)
Are you nuts?  Are you trying to be funny?

Last edited by Spearhead (2006-05-28 23:28:36)

CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6784
The picture reminds me of that Onion headline:
Sudanese 14 year old goes through mid-life crisis.
Stealth42o
She looked 18 to me officer
+175|6900

Miller wrote:

We send money to African governments but they are corrupt and use it for themselves not their people.

Bubbalo wrote:

You also prevent food and medical supplies from entering nations like Cuba and Iraq.
Not to sure where you get your facts from.  However it has been policy since the Kennedy Administration if you saction a country you cannot under the UN's law saction medical and food.

We have been sending meds and food to Cuba for 40 years.

Do you accualy think we could get away with a total imbargo to Cuba?  I think if we were with holding medical supplies and food, the world would have heard about it by now.

Please post anything that is not a blog or an opinion that states the US withholds food and medical supplies to any nation.
Sh1fty2k5
MacSwedish
+113|6938|Sweden
I was kidding about the little girl being a dead nigger, i changed the post to something nice keke?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard