In the end though it should be stressed that individual effort and creativity is what's most important. Going to one of the top 100 unis in the world certainly helps. It's a good learning environment and a healthy experience - though it won't, nor should it be, the defining moment for one's life or career.
Not always though. It concerns me in that sense that an institution's prestige is (particularly in the United States it seems) in some cases an automatic guarantee for a bright future (I'm looking at you, Yale/Harvard). These institutions seem to be home to and form a sort of aristocratic/royal class that is completely uncharacteristic of what is supposed to be a meritocratic society.
Which brings me to the topic of this thread. Clinton vs Bush, lol. Regardless of which one wins it'll be as though royal dynasty has been ruling the US for the last 40 years. Bush Clinton Bush (Obama) Clinton/Bush.
Not always though. It concerns me in that sense that an institution's prestige is (particularly in the United States it seems) in some cases an automatic guarantee for a bright future (I'm looking at you, Yale/Harvard). These institutions seem to be home to and form a sort of aristocratic/royal class that is completely uncharacteristic of what is supposed to be a meritocratic society.
Which brings me to the topic of this thread. Clinton vs Bush, lol. Regardless of which one wins it'll be as though royal dynasty has been ruling the US for the last 40 years. Bush Clinton Bush (Obama) Clinton/Bush.
Last edited by Grasmaaier (2015-07-15 10:37:28)