I believe the cop's side of the story. What about you?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/178bd/178bdb685e9557700e121c23c5aa2885409358b0" alt="https://i.imgur.com/xsoGn9X.jpg"
Congratulations on being a complete moron and looking at the rioters as a mass, and not as individuals, each with own agendas, values, and morals.Dilbert_X wrote:
I like how the blacks response to being over-policed is to make a statement by committing more crime
false, he was a suspect, a fact of which the shooting officer was unaware of at the time.Dilbert_X wrote:
Bleh, a man was shot while on the run from having committed a crime,
Really??........ you don't know about the strong arm robbery video. Yes it was illrelevent at that moment.... the cop told them to get out of the street...they didn't.... he was getting out of his car to make them get out of the street when brown attacked him. Weather or not he knew about the robbery had no influence over his decision to do something about them being in the street and disobeying him, which is the reason the shooting occurred. In fact....had Wilson known about the robbery that would have made him decided to confront brown.....which he was doing anyway.RTHKI wrote:
which video
Last edited by wheelsup@7 (2014-08-21 17:05:48)
Government has no problem installing cameras for red light offenders, airports, ports, trains, mass transit, watching people with aerial surveillance, etc. But put a camera on a cop and all of the sudden he won't be able to do his job correctly.pirana6 wrote:
for the love of all that is holy, why do we not put cameras on all the cops in the nation? if they were right then we can just watch the film and call them innocent. if they were guilty then we can convict them and justice will be served.
dont give me any bullshit about "too-many-cameras-watching-everbody-1984". They are government workers and are on the job. Of course they should not be required to wear them (as shouldn't anybody) when off the clock.
Oh well lets just release him from his jail cell then.SuperJail Warden wrote:
Apparently it wasn't a strong armed robbery. The people who owned the store didn't call the police. Another customer did. From what I heard on CNN, there was a dispute about how many cigars he was given and it led to the confrontation. After he left though, it was over.
Yeah that was definitely a case for rubber bullets and tasers. I also agree with ken on the fact that cops are the first ones to use surveillance video against citizens, but if they were force to wear cameras, that wouldn't be able to do they're job correctly. Bull shit.RTHKI wrote:
so how about those cops shooting the knife wielding guy in stl
arent these situations the reasons they have tasers