OO
Reminds me of Freedom Fighters for PS2.
Seeing as its an MMO though, I imagine a monthly fee might be needed
OO
Reminds me of Freedom Fighters for PS2.
Seeing as its an MMO though, I imagine a monthly fee might be needed
Dont like the HUD. A good HUD is one that does its job when you need to look at it without drawing too much attention to itself.
Also what is the setting? Like post-apocalypse or just very F'ed up future?
Also what is the setting? Like post-apocalypse or just very F'ed up future?
Post-pandemic I think.
Is it exclusively online? It seems pretty cool but I doubt that everyone would coordinate themselves so efficiently when its released.
noice 
I'm sure if you got a bunch of your friends together online it would be sweet. Doesn't seem like a lone wolf type of MMO.
I might get this one, looks ballin.
I might get this one, looks ballin.
If the women don't find ya handsome. They should at least find ya handy.
looks sweet, does remind me of freedom fighters too which i loved, an mmo version of that would be awesome.
this is on pc or what?
this is on pc or what?
pooppooppooppoop
Looks good, but I'm getting tired of the "must highlight everything that might look useful" stuff. Seems to be just a slow paced Battlefield game so far with some interaction elements. Gonna pass this one.
The HUD, cover and gameplay mechanics look just like GR Future Soldier. I hope this is a much better game than GR as I like this idea
Not really sure how it'll work, but I'm liking the look of all these next gen games
Last edited by bennisboy (2013-06-12 12:32:09)
all the next-gen games look incredibly hi-def, as you'd expect, but i somehow have my doubts that any of them will play as smoothly and beautifully as an old quake/ut engine game. that's the big tragedy, really. movement in games like quake was almost poetry - took so much skill in-itself. all these new high-concept games look phenomenal, but their 'feel' normally falls flat.
will have to wait and see...
will have to wait and see...
All the actual movement/gameplay in third person only games tend to suck ass. Ghost Recon, GTA, Red Dead Redemption, etc. etc. are clunky and play like shit. I guess thats the trade off, when you have an open world with hundreds of npcs walking around, but still. Especially when it comes to ranged/shooting guns, these games tend to be several bars lower than fps.
The only time I like third person is when its a first person game that allows you to switch cameras. Rainbow 6 vegas, Skyrim, etc. Modern warfare 2 handled it pretty well, but unfortunately it never took off.
The only time I like third person is when its a first person game that allows you to switch cameras. Rainbow 6 vegas, Skyrim, etc. Modern warfare 2 handled it pretty well, but unfortunately it never took off.