were there any other major debts? Home equity loan? tax issues? I'm not trying to defend anyone but I do know there can be all kinds of bullshit. It's too bad your uncle was, at the very least, not transparent during the process.
To my knowledge my pop had no debts and owned everything outright. He was in his 70's when he died and had owned his previous home outright a couple decades earlier. If he did have any debt I'm sure it was paid out when he received his superannuation when he retired.
I'm aware that even presenting this to my uncle is very serious before even going ahead with the threat of suing him. Which is why I'm going to get all the facts in writing and quadruple check everything so there is no doubt.
I'm aware that even presenting this to my uncle is very serious before even going ahead with the threat of suing him. Which is why I'm going to get all the facts in writing and quadruple check everything so there is no doubt.
So I just got the will in the post now, and read through the whole thing fairly quickly. I also received the sale information from my pop's house.
In the will it says this:
We received around $54,000 to divide equally between my mother, brother and I.
Now that I have it in writing I need to seek legal advice.
In the will it says this:
The house sold for $495,0006. MY EXECUTOR AND MY TRUSTEE (my uncle's name) shall divide my residuary estate and the income derived therefrom into ONE HUNDRED (100) equal parts and hold those parts UPON TRUST :-
(a) to pay SEVENTY FIVE (75) of those parts to my son (my uncle's name) if he survives me PROVIDED that if he predeceases me and dies leaving a child or children him surviving who surviving me and who have attained or lived to attain the age of TWENTY FIVE (25) years then that child of those children shall take and if more than one equally between them the share of my residuary estate and the income derived therefrom which his her or their father would have taken had he lived to attain a vested interest therein;
(b) to pay TWENTY FIVE (25) of those parts to such of my daughter-in-law (my mum's name) and my grandsons (mine and my brother's names) as survive me and have attained or lived to attain the age of TWENTY FIVE (25) years and if more than one as tenants in common in equal shares.
We received around $54,000 to divide equally between my mother, brother and I.
Now that I have it in writing I need to seek legal advice.
well, you can expect 3 responses. two of them won't be pretty. I went through a very similiar inheritance experience(the inheritance part, not the possibly fucked over part), but thankfully my Aunt, the executor of the estate, was very open and communicative during the process. Myself and my siblings were constantly being faxed bills of sale, statements, receipts, all that shit.
The hard part is finding out the total amount my uncle received minus real estate / legal fees. But if I can somehow get that info I think I have enough to make a case.
Luckily I have the name of the real estate who handed the sale of the house. If I can talk to them but not alert my uncle it will hopefully give me a better picture.
Luckily I have the name of the real estate who handed the sale of the house. If I can talk to them but not alert my uncle it will hopefully give me a better picture.
The fucked part in all of this from my end is if my uncle did actually do the right thing but I make him prove it I will have effectively fucked my relationship with him without any positive outcome.
depends on the kind of guy your uncle is. some people understand that trust and verification are not the same thing, some don't. or he just plain screwed you guys out of $40-60k. have you discussed this with your siblings?
Yeah I spoke with my mum and brother the other day, they said they fully back me.
I just need to find the truth out without alerting my uncle. If he did do the right thing then I've got the truth without rocking the boat, if he didn't do the right thing he won't know what hit him
I just need to find the truth out without alerting my uncle. If he did do the right thing then I've got the truth without rocking the boat, if he didn't do the right thing he won't know what hit him
Um, it cna be read in different ways.
None of the executors or trustees will be liable for dishonesty by the other executors or trustees.
None of the executors or trustees will be liable for deliberate actions or deliberate failures to act by the other executors or trustees.
None of the executors or trustees will be required to take legal action against any of the other executors or trustees for any reason.
You can take action against whoever you like if they themselves were dishonest or themselves acted or failed to act and breached the trust, you can't sue any of them for failing to prevent one of the others doing or not doing something.
If your uncle is the sole trustee its all irrelevant.
None of the executors or trustees will be liable for dishonesty by the other executors or trustees.
None of the executors or trustees will be liable for deliberate actions or deliberate failures to act by the other executors or trustees.
None of the executors or trustees will be required to take legal action against any of the other executors or trustees for any reason.
You can take action against whoever you like if they themselves were dishonest or themselves acted or failed to act and breached the trust, you can't sue any of them for failing to prevent one of the others doing or not doing something.
If your uncle is the sole trustee its all irrelevant.
They can, but you can't sue them for not doing so, if 'they' even exist.Further simplified: if your uncle was dishonest, or deliberately acted against the estate's interest, any co-trustee can sue him.
Fuck Israel
It specifically states the trustee or executor (my uncle) is to divide the estate and give us 25%
He wilfully (or so I currently claim) acted dishonestly.
As it currently stands I am not convinced I do not have legal grounds to sue. I just don't have enough evidence.
He wilfully (or so I currently claim) acted dishonestly.
As it currently stands I am not convinced I do not have legal grounds to sue. I just don't have enough evidence.
Last edited by Jaekus (2012-03-23 10:33:03)
If he did not do as instructed by the will then I think its clear he acted dishonestly, the paragraph you quoted only really applies to other executors, if he was the sole executor then I think its irrelevant.
Fuck Israel
I can't contest probate as it's been more than five years apparently but I've been told (by my cousin) that I have grounds to sue for fraud.
I think too much time has passed.
Don't go to law expecting to win simply because you're right.
Don't go to law expecting to win simply because you're right.
Fuck Israel
According to the lawyer I spoke with the other day he said:
I've just scanned and emailed him the will. A little anxious to hear what he has to say.The starting point is 1. Are you a beneficiary? 2. If yes, as a beneficiary you have a right I think in all states to require the Executors and Trustees to explain what assets have come through their hands, what expenses they have incurred and where the money has gone, in order to fulfil the terms of the will. So we need to see the will first and the list of assets at the time the deceased died.
Hope it turns out well for you.Jaekus wrote:
According to the lawyer I spoke with the other day he said:I've just scanned and emailed him the will. A little anxious to hear what he has to say.The starting point is 1. Are you a beneficiary? 2. If yes, as a beneficiary you have a right I think in all states to require the Executors and Trustees to explain what assets have come through their hands, what expenses they have incurred and where the money has gone, in order to fulfil the terms of the will. So we need to see the will first and the list of assets at the time the deceased died.
So my lawyer emailed me yesterday.
He had his team look over the will and it states that as my uncle is sole executor and I am a beneficiary I have entitlement to have the trustee explain what happened with the administration of the estate. He states this should be triggered by a letter to my uncle pointing out my entitlement, which they conveniently enclosed. They also stated they could write formally on behalf of me, but I think I will handle the first part myself and see what the reply is.
I feel pretty anxious about pulling the trigger on this, but I feel I should.
He had his team look over the will and it states that as my uncle is sole executor and I am a beneficiary I have entitlement to have the trustee explain what happened with the administration of the estate. He states this should be triggered by a letter to my uncle pointing out my entitlement, which they conveniently enclosed. They also stated they could write formally on behalf of me, but I think I will handle the first part myself and see what the reply is.
I feel pretty anxious about pulling the trigger on this, but I feel I should.
PS: all that was worded terribly
Money corrupts everyone.Jaekus wrote:
I thought my whole life my uncle is a really nice guy
Only the price threshold is different for every person.
My cousin told me yesterday he also had my pop's second wife's children written out of the will (my pop was married three times, iirc all three wives died of cancer) and tried to have the will of her recently deceased mother (my uncle's ex wife) put over to him as she had not changed it till recently since 1968.
At the moment none of this is proven and I'm sure she (my cousin) is telling me a biased account. I figure that if my uncle has nothing to hide then he won't mind showing the records of how the estate was handled. If he takes offence then so be it. If of course he didn't handle it correctly... he will hear further from my lawyer - who I have found out is actually the director of the law firm he works at... could be somewhat intimidating.
Anyway, time will tell.
At the moment none of this is proven and I'm sure she (my cousin) is telling me a biased account. I figure that if my uncle has nothing to hide then he won't mind showing the records of how the estate was handled. If he takes offence then so be it. If of course he didn't handle it correctly... he will hear further from my lawyer - who I have found out is actually the director of the law firm he works at... could be somewhat intimidating.
Anyway, time will tell.
Depends.Jaekus wrote:
So my lawyer emailed me yesterday.
I feel pretty anxious about pulling the trigger on this, but I feel I should.
Do you expect money out of it?
Do you want to 'set things right'?
going to law is not a rose garden
Fuck Israel
I know, I don't expect it to be all cut and dried, hence the anxiety.
I just want the truth.
I just want the truth.
truth wtf
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Been quite a while. I recently contacted the law firm. They had forgotten and passed me onto a firm that is in the same state as the estate (Western Australia).
In a nutshell, I have to get this resolved this year, as typically there's a 6 year limitation to contest mishandling of probate. This will involve legal costs and is no guarantee I will be successful, or even any proof yet my uncle actually did anything wrong other than some logical speculation that it is quite possible he did.
The law firm can't do much without getting a report of reconciliation of the estate. They want between $500 - $1,500 to do this by liaising with the firm that handled the estate in 2007. I currently can't afford this and have decided to send another letter to my uncle with more direct yet polite language to basically say he has a legal obligation to release a report of his handling of the estate and I have contacted a law firm regarding this. Hopefully he can read between the lines here...
Just thinking about this is making me feel anxious. I'm probably blowing it out of proportion in my head but it still doesn't stop me feeling this way.
Anyone have a similar experience?
In a nutshell, I have to get this resolved this year, as typically there's a 6 year limitation to contest mishandling of probate. This will involve legal costs and is no guarantee I will be successful, or even any proof yet my uncle actually did anything wrong other than some logical speculation that it is quite possible he did.
The law firm can't do much without getting a report of reconciliation of the estate. They want between $500 - $1,500 to do this by liaising with the firm that handled the estate in 2007. I currently can't afford this and have decided to send another letter to my uncle with more direct yet polite language to basically say he has a legal obligation to release a report of his handling of the estate and I have contacted a law firm regarding this. Hopefully he can read between the lines here...
Just thinking about this is making me feel anxious. I'm probably blowing it out of proportion in my head but it still doesn't stop me feeling this way.
Anyone have a similar experience?
Experience?
Going to law is no fun, lawyers are lazy, corrupt and incompetent, and lawyers will usually make more out if than you do, more so if you make nothing.
Going to law is no fun, lawyers are lazy, corrupt and incompetent, and lawyers will usually make more out if than you do, more so if you make nothing.
Fuck Israel
True. It's already looking quite expensive from the get go. I think I will try to handle this by myself for as long as I can and see what eventuates. The more I look into this (anecdotal family evidence and accounts) the more it looks like my uncle did indeed knowingly mishandle the estate.