Pages: 1
Dude, there are a ton of things to bitch about on her. This is waht you got?! The speed limit? In my state thats the tops everywhere. Maybe 1one bit of I95 where it says 70mph.<[onex]>Headstone wrote:
In an effort to save gas, she has introduced a bill to cut NY's speedlimit back down to 65mph. to me its only a pathetic attempt to collect more money from folks speeding. I dont see anyone doing 65 when im on the highway these days, 80 is about the norm.
She has done absolutely NOTHING deserving even a thought of running for Prez.
Last edited by PBAsydney (2006-05-25 05:52:11)
Taxes are never the answer.darad0 wrote:
I actually saw a story yesterday about Senator Clinton possibly proposing a bill to tax oil companies profits and use the taxes for research of alternative energy. I think this is one of the best ideas I've heard yet, and if she runs in 2008 she will probably get my vote. The Clintons are smart people, and political stars, no matter how sleezy or fucked up they are.
As far as lowering the speed limit, thats a pretty bad idea. People in my area, Northern Virginia, do not drive below 70 mph. I just got a wreckless ticket a couple months ago and last night and tonight I have to waste 4 hours in a court ordered driver improvement class. Fucking worst 8 hours of my life.
Last edited by PBAsydney (2006-05-25 06:00:25)
Aim: To reduce the use of petroleum products, thereby lessening the impact of humans on the environment.G3|Genius wrote:
If you raise a tax on something, people will sell/buy/consume less of it simply to avoid paying taxes on it.
Ah.......no. In effect, you have the same number, but rather than getting that from one truck driving multiple times, you get it from multiple trucks driving once. Tonnage remains the same.Stealth42o wrote:
Another point you need to consider. All the trucks the bring our everyday goods around the country. Slower speed equals longer times to get fro point a to b. Which means they will need more trucks to keep up with the demand. Which means you will burn more gas.
Last edited by Bubbalo (2006-05-25 06:29:41)
Hence the reason higher taxes on oil companies will help to replace said oil with a better fuel. True.G3|Genius wrote:
Taxes are never the answer.darad0 wrote:
I actually saw a story yesterday about Senator Clinton possibly proposing a bill to tax oil companies profits and use the taxes for research of alternative energy. I think this is one of the best ideas I've heard yet, and if she runs in 2008 she will probably get my vote. The Clintons are smart people, and political stars, no matter how sleezy or fucked up they are.
As far as lowering the speed limit, thats a pretty bad idea. People in my area, Northern Virginia, do not drive below 70 mph. I just got a wreckless ticket a couple months ago and last night and tonight I have to waste 4 hours in a court ordered driver improvement class. Fucking worst 8 hours of my life.
If you raise a tax on something, people will sell/buy/consume less of it simply to avoid paying taxes on it.
senators should be required to take a class on economics each year they are in term.
lol................. I dont give Karma in the 'Debate and Serious Talk' but I have to for that one, made me laugh my arse off. +1MorbidFetus wrote:
And the worst part about it is that she's not even an atractive lesbian...
Last edited by JahManRed (2006-05-25 07:05:33)
If we didn't, we'd all be commie bastards.JahManRed wrote:
We want want want want...................rant over.
Population, road density and vehicle ownership should be taken into consideration here.PBAsydney wrote:
Speedlimits are good...less people get killed.
But hey, who cares about dead people if you get to places earlier.
56 mph is the maximum on highways here, we have around 10-20 people dying yearly in car accidents.
Give me a break. If you really live in Iceland, than your entire country is smaller than a medium sized US state. What does it take to get from one coast to the opposite side? Maybe 3 hours? That's a bad day's commute in Chicago.PBAsydney wrote:
Speedlimits are good...less people get killed.
But hey, who cares about dead people if you get to places earlier.
56 mph is the maximum on highways here, we have around 10-20 people dying yearly in car accidents.
unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Population, road density and vehicle ownership should be taken into consideration here.
That and Iceland probably doesn't pass out driver's liscense to anyone that can stand up in line long enough like we do in the states.Cpt.Crambone wrote:
Give me a break. If you really live in Iceland, than your entire country is smaller than a medium sized US state. What does it take to get from one coast to the opposite side? Maybe 3 hours? That's a bad day's commute in Chicago.
Not to mention your vicinity to the arctic circle, leading to more difficult and unsafe driving conditions.
You're comparing apples to oranges.
приносить детских включенный comraderemo wrote:
If we didn't, we'd all be commie bastards.JahManRed wrote:
We want want want want...................rant over.
Pages: 1