A clockwork orange. I watched that for the 2nd time Friday
Kubrick>all
Kubrick>all
It could have been executed better, it felt more like a RAH RAH 'MERICA kind of movie to me.FEOS wrote:
AI was a Kubrick film, albeit finished by others.
That would give lie to "everything from Kubrick has merit."
Nice addition of We Were Soldiers. That is probably the best Vietnam movie ever made...as it's actually a true story.
It was based on the factual accounts of the first use of air cav in battle, from both the US and NVA sides. Hardly "rah rah 'merica".UnkleRukus wrote:
It could have been executed better, it felt more like a RAH RAH 'MERICA kind of movie to me.FEOS wrote:
AI was a Kubrick film, albeit finished by others.
That would give lie to "everything from Kubrick has merit."
Nice addition of We Were Soldiers. That is probably the best Vietnam movie ever made...as it's actually a true story.
No it really was rah rah HOORAH patriotic shit. The only thing mel gibson did well was direct apacalypto, and that's it.FEOS wrote:
It was based on the factual accounts of the first use of air cav in battle, from both the US and NVA sides. Hardly "rah rah 'merica".UnkleRukus wrote:
It could have been executed better, it felt more like a RAH RAH 'MERICA kind of movie to me.FEOS wrote:
AI was a Kubrick film, albeit finished by others.
That would give lie to "everything from Kubrick has merit."
Nice addition of We Were Soldiers. That is probably the best Vietnam movie ever made...as it's actually a true story.
Some of it was a bit schmaltzy, but the Vietnam side of it seemed reasonable.FEOS wrote:
It was based on the factual accounts of the first use of air cav in battle, from both the US and NVA sides. Hardly "rah rah 'merica".UnkleRukus wrote:
It could have been executed better, it felt more like a RAH RAH 'MERICA kind of movie to me.FEOS wrote:
AI was a Kubrick film, albeit finished by others.
That would give lie to "everything from Kubrick has merit."
Nice addition of We Were Soldiers. That is probably the best Vietnam movie ever made...as it's actually a true story.
If you read the book, you would think differently. It was a pretty solid adaptation of the book...which was non-fiction, and on of the best accounts of the Vietnam War--from both sides.jord wrote:
The fact that it's based on a true story doesn't automatically make it better than the others in the list either.
I probably will read the book. But for now, rating "the best vietnam movie ever made", I'm gonna put platoon above it.FEOS wrote:
If you read the book, you would think differently. It was a pretty solid adaptation of the book...which was non-fiction, and on of the best accounts of the Vietnam War--from both sides.jord wrote:
The fact that it's based on a true story doesn't automatically make it better than the others in the list either.
The ending was ridiculous, but the rest of the movie was extremely solid. Instead of charging up the hill and capturing the flag, the Americans fought their way out of the valley over the course of a week and walked away with their tail between their legs. That wouldn't have been good Hollywood though.FEOS wrote:
It was based on the factual accounts of the first use of air cav in battle, from both the US and NVA sides. Hardly "rah rah 'merica".UnkleRukus wrote:
It could have been executed better, it felt more like a RAH RAH 'MERICA kind of movie to me.FEOS wrote:
AI was a Kubrick film, albeit finished by others.
That would give lie to "everything from Kubrick has merit."
Nice addition of We Were Soldiers. That is probably the best Vietnam movie ever made...as it's actually a true story.
Sure. Makes perfect sense to put a complete work of fiction over one based on fact when discussing the relative merits of films covering a factual event. To each his own.jord wrote:
I probably will read the book. But for now, rating "the best vietnam movie ever made", I'm gonna put platoon above it.FEOS wrote:
If you read the book, you would think differently. It was a pretty solid adaptation of the book...which was non-fiction, and on of the best accounts of the Vietnam War--from both sides.jord wrote:
The fact that it's based on a true story doesn't automatically make it better than the others in the list either.
Ignorance is bliss. I enjoyed a work of fiction more than I did non fiction.FEOS wrote:
Sure. Makes perfect sense to put a complete work of fiction over one based on fact when discussing the relative merits of films covering a factual event. To each his own.jord wrote:
I probably will read the book. But for now, rating "the best vietnam movie ever made", I'm gonna put platoon above it.FEOS wrote:
If you read the book, you would think differently. It was a pretty solid adaptation of the book...which was non-fiction, and on of the best accounts of the Vietnam War--from both sides.
I have my doubts.OP wrote:
Platoon captures what Vietnam was the best
we were soldiers is such a bad bad bad bad movieFEOS wrote:
AI was a Kubrick film, albeit finished by others.
That would give lie to "everything from Kubrick has merit."
Nice addition of We Were Soldiers. That is probably the best Vietnam movie ever made...as it's actually a true story.
fixt.eleven bravo wrote:
we were soldiers is such a bad bad bad bad movieFEOS wrote:
AI was a Kubrick film, albeit finished by others.
That would give lie to "everything from Kubrick has merit."
Nice addition of We Were Soldiers. That is probably the best Vietnam movie ever made...as it's actually a true story.
-Garryowen trooper who wasn't even alive for Vietnam
That was the movie that would not end. Fucking horrible.jord wrote:
AI wasn't bad. I'm pretty sure I enjoyed it.
I'm yet to watch it in a "sober" state of mind but really you don't watch many films if you regard that as horrible. Even saying mediocre would be doing it a great injustice.FEOS wrote:
That was the movie that would not end. Fucking horrible.jord wrote:
AI wasn't bad. I'm pretty sure I enjoyed it.