Dunno what you're playing, but 99% of my games I play fullscreen.
Except WoW.
Which has an option in the menu.
Except WoW.
Which has an option in the menu.
Now BF2's just gonna show a bunch of scoreboardstazz. wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/BIIQ0.jpg
Woah - Steam put's your own screenshots in the background now - neat!
If Just Cause 2 could figure out my resolution - why can't other games
everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... seriously. ♥
Promised screenshots:
Delivered game:
Never buying another OP Flashpoint.
Delivered game:
Never buying another OP Flashpoint.
Last edited by AussieReaper (2011-03-28 02:02:13)
I have played it and it looked better than that screenshot but not by a whole lot. Were you really expecting the first one?
I never saw what was so interesting about borderlands. There was hardly any variation in that game. Practically the same from beginning to end. Not much of a story. In the end I couldn't be bothered with the end boss fight. But I guess it's one of those games that's supposed to be played co-op, but even then I don't see how that makes it any better.
I've been slowly playing through Dead Space (1), but I never feel like playing this really. It's fun slicing up the monsters but on the PC the controls are so clunky, even on max sensitivity settings aiming and moving is really slow. Especially since enemies spawn behind you alot, it takes like 10 mouse movements to the left or right to turn him around.
This has gotta be the worst example of a console port, I think.
This has gotta be the worst example of a console port, I think.
Last edited by Mekstizzle (2011-02-19 09:45:47)
Learn2sensitivityMekstizzle wrote:
I've been slowly playing through Dead Space (1), but I never feel like playing this really. It's fun slicing up the monsters but on the PC the controls are so clunky, even on max sensitivity settings aiming and moving is really slow. Especially since enemies spawn behind you alot, it takes like 10 mouse movements to the left or right to turn him around.
This has gotta be the worst example of a console port, I think.
It's meant to be slow, the developers have stated this tons of times...
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
No, but they clearly didn't think through mouse aiming/movement. With a joystick it's ok if it's slow as you just hold it down to the left/right and eventually he'll move across. With a mouse, unless your mousepad/area is about 3 meters squared and you have huge arms you're not gonna turn this bastard around with one single movement. You have to keep dragging back and moving again.
You'll need to actually play this game to understand what I'm talking about, instead of making shitty comments about sensitivity in an attempt to act like you know what you're ever talking about.
You'll need to actually play this game to understand what I'm talking about, instead of making shitty comments about sensitivity in an attempt to act like you know what you're ever talking about.
I have played through both DS1 & 2 with no sensitivity problems...Mekstizzle wrote:
No, but they clearly didn't think through mouse aiming/movement. With a joystick it's ok if it's slow as you just hold it down to the left/right and eventually he'll move across. With a mouse, unless your mousepad/area is about 3 meters squared and you have huge arms you're not gonna turn this bastard around with one single movement. You have to keep dragging back and moving again.
You'll need to actually play this game to understand what I'm talking about, instead of making shitty comments about sensitivity in an attempt to act like you know what you're ever talking about.
just adjust the ingame sens as you need and there is no problem
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
My sensitivity was far too high on Dead Space 2 it can be done Mektwazzle.
I used a gamepad for Dead Space it was such a console port, lol.
I played it on a console... seeing as it was developed for consoles.
99% of you people of fucking wastes of flesh.
99% of you people of fucking wastes of flesh.
Borderlands' sometimes successful attempt of humor, especially with CL4P-TP, is what gave it charm. Otherwise, coop with buddies was what sustained it for me.Mekstizzle wrote:
I never saw what was so interesting about borderlands. There was hardly any variation in that game. Practically the same from beginning to end. Not much of a story. In the end I couldn't be bothered with the end boss fight. But I guess it's one of those games that's supposed to be played co-op, but even then I don't see how that makes it any better.
TimmmmaaaaH wrote:
I have played it and it looked better than that screenshot but not by a whole lot. Were you really expecting the first one?
Is anyone expecting that this is what Bf3 will look like?
Nope
it'll look like this
it'll look like this
pretty much tbh... throw in a few new shaders ontop...
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
I've not known such repetitiveness since Assasins Creed 1. Too many weapons as well, that got annoying.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Borderlands' sometimes successful attempt of humor, especially with CL4P-TP, is what gave it charm. Otherwise, coop with buddies was what sustained it for me.Mekstizzle wrote:
I never saw what was so interesting about borderlands. There was hardly any variation in that game. Practically the same from beginning to end. Not much of a story. In the end I couldn't be bothered with the end boss fight. But I guess it's one of those games that's supposed to be played co-op, but even then I don't see how that makes it any better.
Was also frustrating when the car got stuck after you crash and you had to walk for 10 minutes.
I don't mind there being too many weapons, but you're buried in drops that you can only carry and sell if you dedicate like two extra hours per game to looking them over and running back to a vendor. In that respect, the game was irritating.
We are talking Borderlands right?unnamednewbie13 wrote:
I don't mind there being too many weapons, but you're buried in drops that you can only carry and sell if you dedicate like two extra hours per game to looking them over and running back to a vendor. In that respect, the game was irritating.
You should just drop the weapons you don't want to use/collect... if you need money (assuming you have Knoxxx DLC) just kill Knoxxx and sell his pistol which will give a ton... or just do sidequests...
And you can obtain a max inventory of 72, that should be plenty for your gun collection...
EDIT: There is no such thing as "too many weapons", use the ones you like and forget the rest?....
Last edited by FloppY_ (2011-02-20 07:56:47)
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Dead space and mass effect both are both 3rd person right?
yep
This is embarrassing and make fun of me for being a console-tard all you want but,
Killzone 3 comes out on Tuesday and I'm actually kind of excited for it. The beta online was good fun, and the most online gaming I've done in a while.
Oh and apparently I get a $20 gift card from Amazon for pre-ordering through them, so I guess I could buy another game too. I'm thinking Demon's Souls or maybe the original Dead Space, or see if they'll let me apply it to my Portal 2 pre-order.
Killzone 3 comes out on Tuesday and I'm actually kind of excited for it. The beta online was good fun, and the most online gaming I've done in a while.
Oh and apparently I get a $20 gift card from Amazon for pre-ordering through them, so I guess I could buy another game too. I'm thinking Demon's Souls or maybe the original Dead Space, or see if they'll let me apply it to my Portal 2 pre-order.
