IMO people usually take HDR too far. It should be used to enhance or to replicate the subject as accurately as possible. Creative effects are fun, but don't sell your soul for them .
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Every time I mess with HDR it comes out terrible.
rather than create a new thread, i'll hijack Bernidictus'.
Photoshop CS5 will now merge HDR; (click for large size)
Photomatix 3.2; (click for large size)
same three exposures. the photshop merge features 'remove ghosting', which is the difference you see in the flags. there is a way to remove ghosting in a photomatix picture- you import into photoshop.
version 4 of photomatix is in beta, and from what i've seen, 'remove ghosting' is new, along with 'remove noise'. Noise is the second biggest problem with HDR, behind ghosting.
i had just read where there are cameras coming out with HDR on demand, i think they will be point and shoot . . .
Photoshop CS5 will now merge HDR; (click for large size)
Photomatix 3.2; (click for large size)
same three exposures. the photshop merge features 'remove ghosting', which is the difference you see in the flags. there is a way to remove ghosting in a photomatix picture- you import into photoshop.
version 4 of photomatix is in beta, and from what i've seen, 'remove ghosting' is new, along with 'remove noise'. Noise is the second biggest problem with HDR, behind ghosting.
i had just read where there are cameras coming out with HDR on demand, i think they will be point and shoot . . .
copyright me
Last edited by Brasso (2010-07-07 21:21:48)
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
i tried 3 exposures on a flower;
photomatix 3.2, + photoshop cs5 for crop and exposure
photomatix 3.2, + photoshop cs5 for crop and exposure
Wow, that looks like I could feel the texture through my screen!
Last edited by burnzz (2010-10-04 20:49:12)