mtb0minime
minimember
+2,418|6869

I've only played Battlefield 2 and Battlefield 2: Bad Comapny.
pace51
Boom?
+194|5388|Markham, Ontario

mtb0minime wrote:

I've only played Battlefield 2 and Battlefield 2: Bad Comapny.
BF2
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6928|Purplicious Wisconsin
1942, you can't beat a classic
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
pace51
Boom?
+194|5388|Markham, Ontario

War Man wrote:

1942, you can't beat a classic
Ive always wanted to own it. Is it good? And can you really use battleships, subs, several different armies, and aircraft? It sounds awesome.

In other words, Ive considered buying it. Would that be worth it?

Last edited by pace51 (2010-05-15 15:14:14)

War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6928|Purplicious Wisconsin
Well yes of 'course. The only thing I didn't like was the lack of much variation between the armies in their faction. Such as when you had to choose between Axis whether it'd be Japs or Germans they all had the same fucking guns. And faggot players driving the aircraft carrier to the edge of the map

Last edited by War Man (2010-05-15 15:18:40)

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
pace51
Boom?
+194|5388|Markham, Ontario

War Man wrote:

Well yes of 'course. The only thing I didn't like was the lack of much variation between the armies in their faction. Such as when you had to choose between Axis whether it'd be Japs or Germans they all had the same fucking guns. And faggot players driving the aircraft carrier to the edge of the map
really? Same guns? Awww.
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6928|Purplicious Wisconsin

pace51 wrote:

War Man wrote:

Well yes of 'course. The only thing I didn't like was the lack of much variation between the armies in their faction. Such as when you had to choose between Axis whether it'd be Japs or Germans they all had the same fucking guns. And faggot players driving the aircraft carrier to the edge of the map
really? Same guns? Awww.
Well they eventually had it where they slightly differentiated the armies for their faction by having 1 or 2 classes a different primary weapon, still was fun though.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
t0mhank5
Member
+319|6926|Surge
1942 - Great game, but the playerbase and required skill lever is far too restrictive to new players. Imagine BF2 in (another) couple of years: most players have moved on, but the ones who stayed have reached zen mode.

BF2 - best multiplayer FPS to date.
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5474|foggy bottom
A copy of bf1942 came with a gateway i bought in 2003.  I played it only a couple of times though.
Tu Stultus Es
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6836|London, England
I only ever bought BF2 (deluxe) and BF1943
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6660|The Land of Scott Walker

War Man wrote:

1942, you can't beat a classic
This ...
Evil_Black_Fox
Member
+18|5695
In this order:
BF2
1943
Vietnam
All others were trash especially Modern Combat.
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|6921|67.222.138.85
closed

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard