Counter Strike: Source Beta

2010-05-11 16:09:12

#26

Lucien: Fantasma Parastasie; +1,451|6868

FM wrote:
none of which include changes to gameplay

FM wrote:
HAY GUIZ LET'S FUCK WITH THE BALANCE OF A 6 YEAR OLD GAME

Which do you want?

Shall we go back to CS 1.3-style bunnyhopping? Or maybe just CS:S style bunnyhoping from two years ago? How about AWP quickscoping? At what point do we draw the line for these mystical gameplay changes you want that don't fuck with the balance of a 6 year old game?

2010-05-11 16:17:13

#27

Spidery_Yoda: Member; +399|6484

Flaming_Maniac wrote:
ahahaha if that is what they are changing this is even more funny, HAY GUIZ LET'S FUCK WITH THE BALANCE OF A 6 YEAR OLD GAME

But, I'm not looking at a change log, no more comments from the peanut gallery that is me.

It might well be accidental from the engine change.

Last edited by Spidery_Yoda (2010-05-11 16:17:40)

2010-05-11 16:19:47

#28

Flaming_Maniac: prince of insufficient light; +2,490|6921|67.222.138.85

Lucien wrote:
FM wrote:
none of which include changes to gameplay
FM wrote:
HAY GUIZ LET'S FUCK WITH THE BALANCE OF A 6 YEAR OLD GAME
Which do you want?

Shall we go back to CS 1.3-style bunnyhopping? Or maybe just CS:S style bunnyhoping from two years ago? How about AWP quickscoping? At what point do we draw the line for these mystical gameplay changes you want that don't fuck with the balance of a 6 year old game?

legitimate gameplay content, not balancing changes

TF2 patches change the balance, but it's because they add more content. Not because they just tweak the content already there.

2010-05-11 16:21:17

#29

Trotskygrad: бля; +354|6214|Vortex Ring State

Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Lucien wrote:
FM wrote:
none of which include changes to gameplay
FM wrote:
HAY GUIZ LET'S FUCK WITH THE BALANCE OF A 6 YEAR OLD GAME
Which do you want?

Shall we go back to CS 1.3-style bunnyhopping? Or maybe just CS:S style bunnyhoping from two years ago? How about AWP quickscoping? At what point do we draw the line for these mystical gameplay changes you want that don't fuck with the balance of a 6 year old game?
legitimate gameplay content, not balancing changes

TF2 patches change the balance, but it's because they add more content. Not because they just tweak the content already there.

I really hope they add the tac shield tbh.

and moar gunz! (after they start fucking with the balance, everything is possible)

2010-05-11 19:57:43

#30

seymorebutts443: Ready for combat; +211|6810|Belchertown Massachusetts, USA

anyone got an achievement list.

2010-05-11 22:08:47

#31

Fenix14: scout rush kekeke ^___^; +116|6771|Brisbane, Aus

seymorebutts443 wrote:
anyone got an achievement list.

http://www.mantaengie.com/2010/05/11/br … #more-1813

Last edited by Fenix14 (2010-05-11 22:09:09)

2010-05-11 22:40:24

#32

iNeedUrFace4Soup: fuck it; +348|6760

As soon as I saw it pop up on the New Releases list I grabbed it. Updates are fine, people bitch too much.

2010-05-11 22:42:18

#33

DefCon-17: Maple Syrup Faggot; +362|6371|Vancouver | Canada

Fenix14 wrote:
seymorebutts443 wrote:
anyone got an achievement list.
http://www.mantaengie.com/2010/05/11/br … #more-1813

C4? Oh god. Bomb site rigging go!

Bomb has been planted.
Boom.
Bomb has been defused.

Last edited by DefCon-17 (2010-05-11 22:42:50)

2010-05-11 23:53:21

#34

Jenspm: penis; +1,716|6947|St. Andrews / Oslo

God if this becomes as gay as TF2 I'm seriously gonna go cry.

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png

2010-05-12 00:04:26

#35

NateW: my sigs worse than yours; +191|6347

Just trying to lure some players back.

I'd rather play 1.6 if I could find a damn server that wasn't full of bots.

2010-05-12 04:34:56

#36

FloppY_: +1,010|6501|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

DefCon-17 wrote:
FloppY_ wrote:
DefCon-17 wrote:

Or someone just could shoot your feet.

But my favourite tactic is to circle-strafe shield users and knife them.
I figured out that I should crouch when using shield pretty quick tbh
to avoid feet shooters...

Circle strafers win or lose mainly because of lag...
You can still shoot a shield user's feet when he crouches.

Really? hmm rarely happened to me

Oh well just hide your feet behind some rocks

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me

BF2S Forums Counter Strike: Source Beta

FM wrote:

FM wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Lucien wrote:

FM wrote:

FM wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Lucien wrote:

FM wrote:

FM wrote:

seymorebutts443 wrote:

Fenix14 wrote:

seymorebutts443 wrote:

DefCon-17 wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

DefCon-17 wrote:

Board footer