Needs more at my resolution
http://wallbase.net/toplist/213/eqeq/2560x1440/0/111/60
http://wallbase.net/toplist/213/eqeq/2560x1440/0/111/60
how big is your monitor?
27"??
27"??
everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... seriously. ♥
Yeptazz. wrote:
how big is your monitor?
27"??
Needs even higher resolution - like 3920+ :PWinston_Churchill wrote:
Needs more at my resolution :P
http://wallbase.net/toplist/213/eqeq/2560x1440/0/111/60
@Tazz thanks! Why so eager to self-host images?
-kon
I still cannot see any valid reason for using a dock with windows 7Finray wrote:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5823329/SS-2010 … .53.34.jpg
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Sick of bandwidth limitations at sites like photobucket, or how you cant manage them easily at like image shack etc etc..konfusion wrote:
Needs even higher resolution - like 3920+Winston_Churchill wrote:
Needs more at my resolutiontazz. wrote:
http://wallbase.net/
http://wallbase.net/toplist/213/eqeq/2560x1440/0/111/60
@Tazz thanks! Why so eager to self-host images?
-kon
What i do, is i simply use an app called tinygrab.. auto looks for my key inputs (shift ctrl 4) and then uploads it to my /s/ directory and copies the link to my clipboard..
I'm with dreamhost, so unlimited bandwidth
The biggest bandwidth goes to my awsm signatures...
Last edited by tazz. (2010-04-29 17:38:42)
everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... seriously. ♥
4240 pixels is a lot to travel across. It's handy having another place to launch stuff from.FloppY_ wrote:
I still cannot see any valid reason for using a dock with windows 7Finray wrote:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5823329/SS-2010 … .53.34.jpg
I used to think it was useless with W7, but I still use RD. There are uses for it.Finray wrote:
4240 pixels is a lot to travel across. It's handy having another place to launch stuff from.FloppY_ wrote:
I still cannot see any valid reason for using a dock with windows 7Finray wrote:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5823329/SS-2010 … .53.34.jpg
Launch it / windows start menuFinray wrote:
4240 pixels is a lot to travel across. It's handy having another place to launch stuff from.FloppY_ wrote:
I still cannot see any valid reason for using a dock with windows 7Finray wrote:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5823329/SS-2010 … .53.34.jpg
Use it
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
That. And I keep my menu in the middle (right screen, left side)FloppY_ wrote:
Launch it / windows start menuFinray wrote:
4240 pixels is a lot to travel across. It's handy having another place to launch stuff from.FloppY_ wrote:
I still cannot see any valid reason for using a dock with windows 7
Use it
Also, @Tazz Cheers! Might start using that...
-kon
The wallpaper is fixed so that the coin won't go to the edge of the screen, but for some reason Windows just doesn't get that.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
I do use those, it's just handy having other places to start stuff from so I don't have to travel all the way across.FloppY_ wrote:
Launch it / windows start menuFinray wrote:
4240 pixels is a lot to travel across. It's handy having another place to launch stuff from.FloppY_ wrote:
I still cannot see any valid reason for using a dock with windows 7
Use it
I use my taskbar on the left side of my middle monitor, but I put it on the bottom for the screenshot because it looks better.konfusion wrote:
That. And I keep my menu in the middle (right screen, left side)
Also, @Tazz Cheers! Might start using that...
-kon
Liftoff!
Two clocks? Overclocking?
Haha, I have two clocks too, because I can't see the little digital one from the other side of my room - whereas I can see the analogue one.Finray wrote:
Two clocks? Overclocking?
Yep. I guess it is a bit much for your taste, but I like it.Finray wrote:
Two clocks? Overclocking?
I stole that line firstFinray wrote:
Two clocks? Overclocking?
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
It's been while since I've used a 1024X768 screen.
Last edited by max (2010-05-04 17:05:50)
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
epic wallpaper i must say
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
needs more lens flare
Allow me.
You call that lens flare? THIS is lens flare!
-kon
-kon
Who was complaining about big images?
