^DD^GRiPS wrote:
You think console gamers don't spend 3 grand in a year or so? You got to be kidding right. Most people will have more than one console and probably 10 or more games per console? Never mind how much accessory games like guitar hero and the like cost. 300 bucks a system and 60 bucks a game and I bet they exceed 3000 bucks in a year or two easily. So most people wouldn't drop 3 grand at one time but over a year or two they do anyway. It would be much smarter to buy a mid tier gaming PC or laptop that will last much longer than the shelf life of consoles and their games. I have gotten 5 plus years out of each system I have built not even as high as 3 grand
Besides I am sure this year we will hear about the next great mind blowing console that probably won't be compatible with its predecessor, even though the PS finally got smart on that issue.
I agree it sucks when new consoles aren't compatible with old games, yes. That's one of the most annoying things about them. I guess you can DL old games for both ps3 and 360 but still why not just be able to play the actual discs?
But still...
3000 USD is 2200 EUR
a 250gb PS3 slim is on sale here in Finland for 330 euros.
a xbox 360 120 gb with two games for 220 euros.
So if you started with the same amount of money you'd have about 1900-2000 euros to spend on games and extras. Accessories and games are expensive but buy second hand and they're not that bad. I bet most people who have a PS3 buy maybe 500 euro worth of games a year MAX, meaning after 3-4 years, being generous, they might have spent the same as you spent
just for your PC. Plus these things are more expensive here in Europe too.
Now don't get me wrong, I prefer FPS on my PC, likewise strategy games. But I can totally understand why people who want to game like consoles, because they're easy to use, you can hook up with your mates easily online, and so on. PLus you know the games will work and there are NO compatability issues. Buy a PS3 game and it'll work in your PS3, end of story. However as you know game tech is advancing so rapidly that upgrading your computer is a necessity sooner or later, and is a major pain in the ass, not to mention a major expense, for the vast majority of PC users. Good luck playing Crysis 2 on a five-year old machine and get it to look as good as the Xbox 360 version will.
But all this talk aside, your original statement was that FPS games shouldn't be made for consoles - which, irrespective of how much value for money you think you get with consoles, is still a daft statement, sorry.