say war man is 1 and miggle is 2.Miggle wrote:
yes, that still makes sense.
Say japs are 1, chinks are 2, vietnamese are 3, and koreans are 4.
1 + 2 = 3
japs + chinks = vietnamese
1+ 3 = 4
japs + vietnamese = koreans
Last edited by ruisleipa (2010-02-18 23:58:01)
been done in mods several times. keep up!FloppY_ wrote:
More like:SEREVENT wrote:
Battlefield: Hundred Years War anyone?
lol
http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/27377/WinterWar.png
It would be like Zombie mod tbh
Been done. http://www.tankworld.com.au/Ty wrote:
World... of Tanks?
Really marketing department I am dissapointed in you. Surely you could have come up with anything better than "World of Tanks". Jezus, how about "Tankworld"?
Very funny giving a link that isn't about armored war tanks.Cheez wrote:
Been done. http://www.tankworld.com.au/Ty wrote:
World... of Tanks?
Really marketing department I am dissapointed in you. Surely you could have come up with anything better than "World of Tanks". Jezus, how about "Tankworld"?
Interesting concept but I think the gameplay is a little lacking.
Pershing wasn't widely used. in the few engagements it was in it did knock out Panthers and Tigers, but it also got itself knocked out a few times as well. The 11:1 KD of the Tiger surpasses it.War Man wrote:
I hope they have the Pershing. That thing kicked Panther and Tiger ass
The Pershing was used more than the Mausseymorebutts443 wrote:
Pershing wasn't widely used. in the few engagements it was in it did knock out Panthers and Tigers, but it also got itself knocked out a few times as well. The 11:1 KD of the Tiger surpasses it.War Man wrote:
I hope they have the Pershing. That thing kicked Panther and Tiger ass
Your point? if you use that reasoning then the final US tank should be the Super Pershing.War Man wrote:
The Pershing was used more than the Mausseymorebutts443 wrote:
Pershing wasn't widely used. in the few engagements it was in it did knock out Panthers and Tigers, but it also got itself knocked out a few times as well. The 11:1 KD of the Tiger surpasses it.War Man wrote:
I hope they have the Pershing. That thing kicked Panther and Tiger ass
Wouldn't hurt I guess. Adds more to the US other than the Sherman; some m2's and m3's; m10; Priest; and a couple other vehicles I can't remember.seymorebutts443 wrote:
Your point? if you use that reasoning then the final US tank should be the Super Pershing.War Man wrote:
The Pershing was used more than the Mausseymorebutts443 wrote:
Pershing wasn't widely used. in the few engagements it was in it did knock out Panthers and Tigers, but it also got itself knocked out a few times as well. The 11:1 KD of the Tiger surpasses it.
US its going to be the M5 stuart, M24 Chaffee, M22 Locust, M4, M10, M18, M36, M8, T17, and the M26.War Man wrote:
Wouldn't hurt I guess. Adds more to the US other than the Sherman; some m2's and m3's; m10; Priest; and a couple other vehicles I can't remember.seymorebutts443 wrote:
Your point? if you use that reasoning then the final US tank should be the Super Pershing.War Man wrote:
The Pershing was used more than the Maus
They said they will have American, German, and Russian tanks only.seymorebutts443 wrote:
US its going to be the M5 stuart, M24 Chaffee, M22 Locust, M4, M10, M18, M36, M8, T17, and the M26.War Man wrote:
Wouldn't hurt I guess. Adds more to the US other than the Sherman; some m2's and m3's; m10; Priest; and a couple other vehicles I can't remember.seymorebutts443 wrote:
Your point? if you use that reasoning then the final US tank should be the Super Pershing.
Brits will probably look similar with the shermans, with the exception of the firefly. They will have the Cruiser MKIII and up series, the Cromwell and its varients, the Churchill, Valentine, Matilda, and the Centurion as their final one.
Russia will be most interesting, espically with the KV-2, that thing would blow a tiger turret clean off with just an HE shell. Plus the KV-2 and it's brother the KV-1 were fielded in 1939+. The latter has a fantastic history behind it.
That's bullshit, UK had some of the most interesting and badass tanks of the war. I would rather be rolling around in a Cromwell or a Churchill than a Sherman.War Man wrote:
They said they will have American, German, and Russian tanks only.seymorebutts443 wrote:
US its going to be the M5 stuart, M24 Chaffee, M22 Locust, M4, M10, M18, M36, M8, T17, and the M26.War Man wrote:
Wouldn't hurt I guess. Adds more to the US other than the Sherman; some m2's and m3's; m10; Priest; and a couple other vehicles I can't remember.
Brits will probably look similar with the shermans, with the exception of the firefly. They will have the Cruiser MKIII and up series, the Cromwell and its varients, the Churchill, Valentine, Matilda, and the Centurion as their final one.
Russia will be most interesting, espically with the KV-2, that thing would blow a tiger turret clean off with just an HE shell. Plus the KV-2 and it's brother the KV-1 were fielded in 1939+. The latter has a fantastic history behind it.
That's what it says, read it for yourself.seymorebutts443 wrote:
That's bullshit, UK had some of the most interesting and badass tanks of the war. I would rather be rolling around in a Cromwell or a Churchill than a Sherman.War Man wrote:
They said they will have American, German, and Russian tanks only.seymorebutts443 wrote:
US its going to be the M5 stuart, M24 Chaffee, M22 Locust, M4, M10, M18, M36, M8, T17, and the M26.
Brits will probably look similar with the shermans, with the exception of the firefly. They will have the Cruiser MKIII and up series, the Cromwell and its varients, the Churchill, Valentine, Matilda, and the Centurion as their final one.
Russia will be most interesting, espically with the KV-2, that thing would blow a tiger turret clean off with just an HE shell. Plus the KV-2 and it's brother the KV-1 were fielded in 1939+. The latter has a fantastic history behind it.
Well done War Man. Have a cookie.War Man wrote:
Very funny giving a link that isn't about armored war tanks.Cheez wrote:
Been done. http://www.tankworld.com.au/Ty wrote:
World... of Tanks?
Really marketing department I am dissapointed in you. Surely you could have come up with anything better than "World of Tanks". Jezus, how about "Tankworld"?
Interesting concept but I think the gameplay is a little lacking.
Last edited by War Man (2010-04-17 08:12:49)
