I don't think you realize that these were always console games.Finray wrote:
Xbox/PS3 were invented.Dauntless wrote:
Why don't they make RPGs as awesome as this anymore?
Oh does anyone remember The Legend of Dragoon?
Ahhhhhh that was also an amazing RPG, not as good as FF but still fantastic.
Ahhhhhh that was also an amazing RPG, not as good as FF but still fantastic.
JRPGs = shit.
true story.
true story.
Which were on the PS2.Miggle wrote:
I don't think you realize that these were always console games.Finray wrote:
Xbox/PS3 were invented.Dauntless wrote:
Why don't they make RPGs as awesome as this anymore?
PS1Finray wrote:
Which were on the PS2.Miggle wrote:
I don't think you realize that these were always console games.Finray wrote:
Xbox/PS3 were invented.
derpMiggle wrote:
JRPGs = shit.
true story.
derpFinray wrote:
Which were on the PS2.Miggle wrote:
I don't think you realize that these were always console games.Finray wrote:
Xbox/PS3 were invented.
Ach, I didn't really follow it. Wasn't there up to like 13 on the PS2?Miggle wrote:
PS1Finray wrote:
Which were on the PS2.Miggle wrote:
I don't think you realize that these were always console games.
The point I was making is that since the XBox 360/PS3 were released, casual gaming became available - and cheap. Mass market, more buying power, devs turn to pleasing the casual gamer, not someone who actually wants, I dunno, a good game.
They aren't even true RPGs most of them.Miggle wrote:
JRPGs = shit.
true story.
derp
JRPGs suck, and have been virtually untouched by changes in the market.Finray wrote:
Ach, I didn't really follow it. Wasn't there up to like 13 on the PS2?Miggle wrote:
PS1Finray wrote:
Which were on the PS2.
The point I was making is that since the XBox 360/PS3 were released, casual gaming became available - and cheap. Mass market, more buying power, devs turn to pleasing the casual gamer, not someone who actually wants, I dunno, a good game.
Dauntless wrote:
derp
holy shitDauntless wrote:
Oh does anyone remember The Legend of Dragoon?
Ahhhhhh that was also an amazing RPG, not as good as FF but still fantastic.
yes
init sam!
Thats what im talkin 'bout.
Too bad my fucking disc got scratched and didn't work anymore
Thats what im talkin 'bout.
Too bad my fucking disc got scratched and didn't work anymore
dart! hes so dreamy!
Would like a word with you
gust of wind d-dance!Dauntless wrote:
Oh does anyone remember The Legend of Dragoon?
Ahhhhhh that was also an amazing RPG, not as good as FF but still fantastic.
Continuing my running commentary of my tales playing this archetypical Jap game, I just did the train mission thing and fought that deformed Zombie thing, now I'm running around the town of Timber blasting fools and after a cheeky look at a walkthrough, found out where the hell the place is that I had to go, they sort of put it in a stupid part of the town, and the "map" they gave you was fucking stupid, if anyone knows what map of Timber I'm talking about, you'll realise
Yeah that map is useless. I was way confused when I first went through.Mekstizzle wrote:
Continuing my running commentary of my tales playing this archetypical Jap game, I just did the train mission thing and fought that deformed Zombie thing, now I'm running around the town of Timber blasting fools and after a cheeky look at a walkthrough, found out where the hell the place is that I had to go, they sort of put it in a stupid part of the town, and the "map" they gave you was fucking stupid, if anyone knows what map of Timber I'm talking about, you'll realise
I could never get into the FF thing. I know RPG's aren't the pinnacle of realism, but it always seemed over the top, even by genre standards.
Also, why are female characters always dangerously under protected?
Also, why are female characters always dangerously under protected?
Because they have to show what they got.S.Lythberg wrote:
I could never get into the FF thing. I know RPG's aren't the pinnacle of realism, but it always seemed over the top, even by genre standards.
Also, why are female characters always dangerously under protected?
How did the PS3 and 360 change casual gaming? The casual gamer has always been there, same as the serious gamer. The difference is that more people are playing games period. The older generation that grew up on Intellivision, Atari and NES are the core of the casual gamer population.Finray wrote:
Ach, I didn't really follow it. Wasn't there up to like 13 on the PS2?Miggle wrote:
PS1Finray wrote:
Which were on the PS2.
The point I was making is that since the XBox 360/PS3 were released, casual gaming became available - and cheap. Mass market, more buying power, devs turn to pleasing the casual gamer, not someone who actually wants, I dunno, a good game.
they made local multiplayer a lot rarer and added a generally shit online service.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
How did the PS3 and 360 change casual gaming? The casual gamer has always been there, same as the serious gamer. The difference is that more people are playing games period. The older generation that grew up on Intellivision, Atari and NES are the core of the casual gamer population.Finray wrote:
Ach, I didn't really follow it. Wasn't there up to like 13 on the PS2?Miggle wrote:
PS1
The point I was making is that since the XBox 360/PS3 were released, casual gaming became available - and cheap. Mass market, more buying power, devs turn to pleasing the casual gamer, not someone who actually wants, I dunno, a good game.
Let me do you a graph.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
How did the PS3 and 360 change casual gaming? The casual gamer has always been there, same as the serious gamer. The difference is that more people are playing games period. The older generation that grew up on Intellivision, Atari and NES are the core of the casual gamer population.Finray wrote:
Ach, I didn't really follow it. Wasn't there up to like 13 on the PS2?Miggle wrote:
PS1
The point I was making is that since the XBox 360/PS3 were released, casual gaming became available - and cheap. Mass market, more buying power, devs turn to pleasing the casual gamer, not someone who actually wants, I dunno, a good game.
\_/
source?Finray wrote:
Let me do you a graph.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
How did the PS3 and 360 change casual gaming? The casual gamer has always been there, same as the serious gamer. The difference is that more people are playing games period. The older generation that grew up on Intellivision, Atari and NES are the core of the casual gamer population.Finray wrote:
Ach, I didn't really follow it. Wasn't there up to like 13 on the PS2?
The point I was making is that since the XBox 360/PS3 were released, casual gaming became available - and cheap. Mass market, more buying power, devs turn to pleasing the casual gamer, not someone who actually wants, I dunno, a good game.
http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/33829/kengraph.png
