[Supreme Commander] This looks AWESOME

2009-10-24 14:13:57

#1

_j5689_: Dreads & Bergers; +364|6974|Riva, MD

How come I never hear about this game other than it being one of the first few games to utilize multi-core processors? Maybe I'm looking in the wrong places or it's really a piece of shit but I think it looks really cool:

On a side note, every Youtube video of it has terrible quality, none of them are even HD.

Last edited by _j5689_ (2009-10-24 14:14:52)

2009-10-24 14:22:26

#2

farmerfez: o wut?; +78|6788

your like 2 years late.....

2009-10-24 14:25:26

#3

_j5689_: Dreads & Bergers; +364|6974|Riva, MD

farmerfez wrote:
your like 2 years late.....

I know, but still. Surely other people must've missed this game as well

2009-10-24 14:27:10

#4

Vilham: Say wat!?; +580|7024|UK

how have u not heard of this game before? If you enjoy RTS at all and havent been living under a rock for the last two years.

Its amazing, if u have a powerful rig then get it, seriously good fun. Involves a lot of resource management to get good, but great none the less.

2009-10-24 14:29:11

#5

cowami: OY, BITCHTITS!; +1,106|6547|Noo Yawk, Noo Yawk

it's good, although it dominates my computer

be prepared for extremely long battles, since many of the larger and more advanced units can take time to build (i built a battleship once that took 30 minutes real-time)

2009-10-24 14:30:43

#6

Sydney: 2λчиэλ; +783|7101|Reykjavík, Iceland.

cowami wrote:
it's good, although it dominates my computer

be prepared for extremely long battles, since many of the larger and more advanced units can take time to build (i built a battleship once that took 30 minutes real-time)

But those units are FUCKING EPIC

2009-10-24 14:33:25

#7

cowami: OY, BITCHTITS!; +1,106|6547|Noo Yawk, Noo Yawk

Sydney wrote:
cowami wrote:
it's good, although it dominates my computer

be prepared for extremely long battles, since many of the larger and more advanced units can take time to build (i built a battleship once that took 30 minutes real-time)
But those units are FUCKING EPIC

tru dat

except when your half-hour-of-your-life-to-build battleship get rapedfaced by 6 minute-to-build submarines within 30 seconds of its life

2009-10-24 14:40:34

#8

_j5689_: Dreads & Bergers; +364|6974|Riva, MD

Got it for 10$ new on Buy.com

Got the expansion for 20$ on some cow-thing name website I can't remember. The bastards charged me Maryland sales tax and they ship from California, wtf. Still saved 2$ over Newegg

Still can't wait for them to get here.

2009-10-24 14:53:36

#9

farmerfez: o wut?; +78|6788

_j5689_ wrote:
Got it for 10$ new on Buy.com

Got the expansion for 20$ on some cow-thing name website I can't remember. The bastards charged me Maryland sales tax and they ship from California, wtf. Still saved 2$ over Newegg

Still can't wait for them to get here.

i acquired it for free and deleted it in the same day

2009-10-24 16:47:56

#10

Flecco: iPod is broken.; +1,048|6922|NT, like Mick Dundee

I have it, not the exp pack though.

Enjoyable, but not my cup of tea. I like my RTS really, really fast.

Still, having a huge tech3 arty battery pounding away at the enemies base was fun.

Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.

2009-10-24 17:54:47

#11

Aries_37: arrivederci frog; +368|6833|London

Good game that was ruined by bad balance with even worse patches and a really buggy online ranking system

On a side note:

https://img229.imageshack.us/img229/3630/supcom2v2.jpg

Last edited by Aries_37 (2009-10-24 17:58:21)

2009-10-24 18:04:29

#12

[HOF]Mercenary: o_O; +53|6436

Got it for $3.90 at target. Well worth the money

2009-10-24 18:52:45

#13

_j5689_: Dreads & Bergers; +364|6974|Riva, MD

[HOF]Mercenary wrote:
Got it for $3.90 at target. Well worth the money

Wtf, was it on sale or something?

2009-10-28 21:31:27

#14

Rod Foxx: Warblgarbl; +78|6241|Perth, Australia

[HOF]Mercenary wrote:
Got it for $3.90 at target. Well worth the money

Not worth the money imo. Started off really excited about it and then i played it

I really liked many of the mechanics they introduced into the game but i found the game to be bland and repetitive once you got past the initial awe. Maybe it was just the people i played with

Spoiler (highlight to read):
And yes i could run it well

2009-10-29 01:08:33

#15

TimmmmaaaaH: Damn, I... had something for this; +725|6697|Brisbane, Australia

The Forged Alliance expansion improved a lot on the original.

Also, it has build templates. Thats awesome.

It is definitely a slow game. It has a great sense of scale to it though.

https://bf3s.com/sigs/5e6a35c97adb20771c7b713312c0307c23a7a36a.png

2009-10-29 06:42:38

#16

Vilham: Say wat!?; +580|7024|UK

lol slow game... Most pro games end just as quickly as a starcraft game. more than 15 mins is a long game in SupCom

2009-10-29 06:44:19

#17

Cheez: Herman is a warmaphrodite; +1,027|6696|King Of The Islands

TA was better.

My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.

2009-10-29 07:41:47

#18

steelie34: pub hero!; +603|6639|the land of bourbon

its good. there are some mods to make the gameplay better. i like act of war better than supreme commander atm.

https://bf3s.com/sigs/36e1d9e36ae924048a933db90fb05bb247fe315e.png

2009-10-29 08:17:30

#19

TimmmmaaaaH: Damn, I... had something for this; +725|6697|Brisbane, Australia

Vilham wrote:
lol slow game... Most pro games end just as quickly as a starcraft game. more than 15 mins is a long game in SupCom

Well from my experience its a slow game.

Any game can be a fast game if you just rush.

Not sure how you build experimentals etc in 15m. And a game of all T1/2 is pretty boring.

Last edited by TimmmmaaaaH (2009-10-29 08:17:45)

2009-10-29 10:07:28

#20

Vilham: Say wat!?; +580|7024|UK

TimmmmaaaaH wrote:
Vilham wrote:
lol slow game... Most pro games end just as quickly as a starcraft game. more than 15 mins is a long game in SupCom
Well from my experience its a slow game.

Any game can be a fast game if you just rush.

Not sure how you build experimentals etc in 15m. And a game of all T1/2 is pretty boring.

lol, if u get to the experimental stage then u guys arent fighting enough, just turtling. Personally I love turtling, I dont have the skills to micro manage all of the resources to do it fast. But even if pros get to a stalemate in T1/2, which does sometimes happen, they will have experimentals by 20-25 mins and the game will be over in 30.

Just coz u and I aren't fast doesnt mean the game isnt.

2009-10-29 10:24:16

#21

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6046|Catherine Black

Fantastic game, works on dual monitors too.

2009-10-29 13:09:39

#22

_j5689_: Dreads & Bergers; +364|6974|Riva, MD

Got it yesterday, decided to just do the Cybran campaign first to get the first two demo levels over with even though I was near the end of the 2nd one on the demo.

2009-10-29 21:21:34

#23

TimmmmaaaaH: Damn, I... had something for this; +725|6697|Brisbane, Australia

Vilham wrote:
TimmmmaaaaH wrote:
Vilham wrote:
lol slow game... Most pro games end just as quickly as a starcraft game. more than 15 mins is a long game in SupCom
Well from my experience its a slow game.

Any game can be a fast game if you just rush.

Not sure how you build experimentals etc in 15m. And a game of all T1/2 is pretty boring.
lol, if u get to the experimental stage then u guys arent fighting enough, just turtling. Personally I love turtling, I dont have the skills to micro manage all of the resources to do it fast. But even if pros get to a stalemate in T1/2, which does sometimes happen, they will have experimentals by 20-25 mins and the game will be over in 30.

Just coz u and I aren't fast doesnt mean the game isnt.

Ok, that makes more sense.

For someone playing for the first few times though, it is generally slow.

2009-12-03 03:39:42

#24

Shadow893: lel; +75|6950|England

Cheez wrote:
TA was better.

this man speaks the truth

2009-12-04 03:31:18

#25

globefish23: sophisticated slacker; +334|6581|Graz, Austria

Shadow893 wrote:
Cheez wrote:
TA was better.
this man speaks the truth

Indeed.

BF2S Forums [Supreme Commander] This looks AWESOME

farmerfez wrote:

cowami wrote:

Sydney wrote:

cowami wrote:

_j5689_ wrote:

[HOF]Mercenary wrote:

[HOF]Mercenary wrote:

Vilham wrote:

TimmmmaaaaH wrote:

Vilham wrote:

Vilham wrote:

TimmmmaaaaH wrote:

Vilham wrote:

Cheez wrote:

Shadow893 wrote:

Cheez wrote:

Board footer