BF2S Forums You think U.S. is going to attack North Korea?

Rosse_modest wrote:

blademaster wrote:

***Also North Korea government stated that they have a nuclear weapon and they said they won’t be afraid to use it if someone attacks them******

Of course they will. Why else build nuclear weapons if you're not gonna use them as a last resort?

*cough* DETERRENT *cough*

Don't they only have about 155 million barrels?
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/55a/161.html

Last edited by UnOriginalNuttah (2006-04-10 06:52:12)

Spark wrote:

Rosse_modest wrote:

blademaster wrote:

***Also North Korea government stated that they have a nuclear weapon and they said they won’t be afraid to use it if someone attacks them******

Of course they will. Why else build nuclear weapons if you're not gonna use them as a last resort?

*cough* DETERRENT *cough*

The threat of using nuclear weapons if attacked is the deterrent. Like I said.

will never happen, korea will fold under trade restrictions, or they will ask for a butt load of money to stop whatever it is they are doing , then they will do it anyways.

jonnykill wrote:

I don't think we would attack North Korea without them striking the U.S or South Korea first .
Althought they pose a threat I don't think North Korea wants to put itself in that situation as well .
IMHO though Kim Jong Ill is a paronoid freak . The stories coming out of there on that special " Children of the secret state " was enough to turn my stomach .

As far as Iran goes I think we will take Terahn just as quickly as Baghdad and suffer no more them 100 KIA's . As usual most will be accidents and freindly fire . It will have to be a quick and sudden strike though .
No troops at the boarder rattling sabers for 5 months . Right now we are in the political faze of rattling sabers and that's as far as we should take it . If they refuse to listen to the international community then we should fuck their shit up and set'em back a few years in the developement of WMD's .

This is not the johnnykill that I grew to know and love......Why do you have opposing views on Iran and Iraq?

North Korea can't do shit, even China is nervous about them having nukes.

lowing wrote:

jonnykill wrote:

I don't think we would attack North Korea without them striking the U.S or South Korea first .
Althought they pose a threat I don't think North Korea wants to put itself in that situation as well .
IMHO though Kim Jong Ill is a paronoid freak . The stories coming out of there on that special " Children of the secret state " was enough to turn my stomach .

As far as Iran goes I think we will take Terahn just as quickly as Baghdad and suffer no more them 100 KIA's . As usual most will be accidents and freindly fire . It will have to be a quick and sudden strike though .
No troops at the boarder rattling sabers for 5 months . Right now we are in the political faze of rattling sabers and that's as far as we should take it . If they refuse to listen to the international community then we should fuck their shit up and set'em back a few years in the developement of WMD's .

This is not the johnnykill that I grew to know and love......Why do you have opposing views on Iran and Iraq?

Iraq - no threat

Iran - threat

Simple .

"But Iraq was in communication with terrorists," Yeah . heh . Ain't that something ( rolls eyes )

jonnykill wrote:

"But Iraq was in communication with terrorists," Yeah . heh . Ain't that something ( rolls eyes )

part of the country was, not the government... but on the North Korean matter... if they piss off the US... South Korean Marines go attack... maybe japan may help by using bombing runs and my math tutor here in taiwan(hes from florida) will join the Army (Military Police) again. but i doubt US will do sumthing to NK soon

Pubic wrote:

North Korea can't do shit, even China is nervous about them having nukes.

Yeah you must be thinking U.S. cant do shit because U.S. has to worry about pleasing people as North Korea does not have to please no one. So like Spark side you must be contradicting your self. I don't know where you live but U.S. people are not willing to sink down and to lose everything they have by engaging in a nuclear war, and plus the life style is so high here compared to N. Korea people there barely have anything to eat there is no electricity in cities and so on. So U.S. has potentially much more to lose than you imagined so don’t go ahead of your self thinking that N. Korea can’t do shit.

Last edited by blademaster (2006-04-11 07:36:00)

( basically, because they have n oreason to live ) seriously man , wtf is the matter with you ?
And no I can't agree . Forget it man , just forget it .

lowing wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

jonnykill wrote:

"But Iraq was in communication with terrorists," Yeah . heh . Ain't that something ( rolls eyes )

part of the country was, not the government... but on the North Korean matter... if they piss off the US... South Korean Marines go attack... maybe japan may help by using bombing runs and my math tutor here in taiwan(hes from florida) will join the Army (Military Police) again. but i doubt US will do sumthing to NK soon

are you saying part of Iraq was communicating with terrorists, but NOT Sadam Hussein?

I posted on another thread that I don't think NK is a threat because they don't seem to be suicidal. They know any attacks they make will mean their own destruction. The Middle East on the other hand, is insane and have no fear of dying ( basically, because they have n oreason to live ) and no fear of taking as many infidels as they can, with them. They think life doesn't start until you reach Mecca with their 70 virgins or what ever the hell it is.

This is only my perseption and I have no "wikipedia" articles to back it up. lol. But would you agree??

actually, I wouldn't. there are lots of middle eastern countries that are peaceful towards western nations ( the US calls a lot of them their allies, if I remember correctly ). Labelling a minority as madmen doesn't get us anywhere.

None of the middle eastern nation has the military potential to even touch one of the western countries, let alone conduct a successful military campaign. That was true for Iraq and is true for Iran.
The only reason to attack Iran now is to try to prevent them from getting nukes. Once they have nukes, the whole strategic picture would change dramatically, because no one knows where a military campaign against a nuclear power would end up. It just hasn't happened yet, and my guess would be that the US and Israel will go to great lengths to prevent it from happening.

Bottom line is, if Iran managed to develop nukes, the US would not be able to function as the hegemonial superpower in the middle eastern region any more.