BF2S Forums I'm glad the patriot act is getting some limelight ......

#include <stdio.h>
main(t,_,a)char *a;{return!0<t?t<3?main(-79,-13,a+main(-87,1-_,
main(-86,0,a+1)+a)):1,t<_?main(t+1,_,a):3,main(-94,-27+t,a)&&t==2?_<13?
main(2,_+1,"%s %d %d\n"):9:16:t<0?t<-72?main(_,t,
"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de}+,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#{l,+,/n{n+,/+#n+,/#\
;#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r :'d*'3,}{w+K w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l \
q#'+d'K#!/+k#;q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl]'/+#n';d}rw' i;# \
){nl]!/n{n#'; r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#n'wk nw' \
iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c \
;;{nl'-{}rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# \
}'+}##(!!/")
:t<-50?_==*a?putchar(31[a]):main(-65,_,a+1):main((*a=='/')+t,_,a+1)
  :0<t?main(2,2,"%s"):*a=='/'||main(0,main(-61,*a,
"!ek;dc i@bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry"),a+1);}

(a) AMENDMENT OF THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT- Section 105 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1105) is amended--

(1) in the section heading, by inserting `; DATA EXCHANGE' after `SECURITY OFFICERS';

    (2) by inserting `(a)' after `SEC. 105.';

    (3) in subsection (a), by inserting `and border' after `internal' the second place it appears;

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Marconius wrote:

I'll post the actual Patriot Act here for all to read through or pick points out of before discussing it:

H.R. 3162: The Patriot Act

You're asking people on these forums to read through all of that? Might as well assign 'Love and War.'

UnOriginalNuttah wrote:

Yeah, anyone can decide an existing document doesn't fit in with their view of things and make crazy amendments so confusing it takes a long time to figure out the new intention.

BF2S Patriot Act wrote:

Modification to the stated opinions of posting regarding topic BF2S.#20088.

    In the post marked #3 the following amendments are requested to better reflect the needs of this thread to provide criticism to the act refered to within the post by the acronym PA.  Henceforth it shall modified thusly:

    1.  By inserting 'Do you believe ' before the word it's.

    2.  By striking the second line.

    5.  At the end of the end of the amended paragraph, inserting the phrase "No, it will persist beyond the scope it was intended for."

    3.  By striking the word 'If' and replacing with 'In the unlikely event that'.

    4.  Replacing the second occurance of '...' with "? ".

Kimosabe-sa wrote:

An whats next in america thought criminals? Oh wait you have that already...

JimKong wrote:

UnOriginalNuttah wrote:

Kimosabe-sa wrote:

An whats next in america thought criminals? Oh wait you have that already...

According to 1984, we just need a war in a far off land that never ends against an indeterminate and changing foe, and numerous government orchestrated bombings blamed on terrorists to make sure that no-one ever questions the danger they are in....

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060410/ap_ … wh/us_iran

sfg-Ice__ wrote:

If the PA prevents just one terrorist attack...its all worth it...

Its alot of responsibility and has alot of room to turn south real quick.  We'll see how it is in a few month or a year..