| Rifleman | 20% | 20% - 20 | ||||
| Infantry | 10% | 10% - 10 | ||||
| Scout | 6% | 6% - 6 | ||||
| I don't have this game | 63% | 63% - 63 | ||||
| Total: 99 | ||||||
For console, yeah.SGT_Dicklewicz wrote:
Is this crap even out yet?
Well these forums came to be by a game from EA...GR34 wrote:
i am sorry but why would you buy a game by EA?
I didn't buy it, I tried out the 30 minute trial version. Will buy this game for xbox when I get my wireless adapter and maybe the PC version as well.GR34 wrote:
i am sorry but why would you buy a game by EA?
It's actually by DICE. EA publish the game. Although EA bought DICE, it's still DICE, not EA.GR34 wrote:
i am sorry but why would you buy a game by EA?
Um, they actually did try to develop clones/copies of the M1 Garand, but non of them ever entered service with the Japanese military. Only 250 were ever built anyway. The one used in bf1943 is the type 5. Although its reloading is unrealistic as it reloads like the G41 and Lee Enfield in real life and also has 10 rounds not 8, but DICE had to balance it out that way.Mekstizzle wrote:
It's actually by DICE. EA publish the game. Although EA bought DICE, it's still DICE, not EA.GR34 wrote:
i am sorry but why would you buy a game by EA?
I always find it funny when you have tards who don't understand simple things blaming EA for everything. You tell them about DICE and they have no idea what you're even talking about.
The game is actually quite good considering its price, and, I haven't played BF1942 properly or Vietnam, but I'd say it's one of the better balanced BF games out there.
Anyway there's only three classes in the game. They're all good for certain situations. Most of the time I'm Rifleman, despite the fact that the Japanese use what looks like a reverse engineered M1 Garand (I doubt they did that in real life) the fakeness doesn't get in the way of the fact that it's my fav class. Most of the time it's two shots to the chest
Thats not about balance, thats about lazyness. In BF1942 japanese had 10 rounds in theur rufle while marines had 8, both rifles did the same damage. And it worked perfectly well. Imo if you are doing a game based on real conflict with real weaponry and vehicles, they should at least have realistic number of ammo, rpm and so on.War Man wrote:
Although its reloading is unrealistic as it reloads like the G41 and Lee Enfield in real life and also has 10 rounds not 8, but DICE had to balance it out that way.
Yeah, exactly. In BF1943 it reloads like the Garand, infact it's like the Garand in almost every single aspect. I guess they could've changed the model and the reloading yet still keep it all balanced. I have a feeling they're going to add stuff and change things around with patches later on, though.War Man wrote:
Um, they actually did try to develop clones/copies of the M1 Garand, but non of them ever entered service with the Japanese military. Only 250 were ever built anyway. The one used in bf1943 is the type 5. Although its reloading is unrealistic as it reloads like the G41 and Lee Enfield in real life and also has 10 rounds not 8, but DICE had to balance it out that way.Mekstizzle wrote:
It's actually by DICE. EA publish the game. Although EA bought DICE, it's still DICE, not EA.GR34 wrote:
i am sorry but why would you buy a game by EA?
I always find it funny when you have tards who don't understand simple things blaming EA for everything. You tell them about DICE and they have no idea what you're even talking about.
The game is actually quite good considering its price, and, I haven't played BF1942 properly or Vietnam, but I'd say it's one of the better balanced BF games out there.
Anyway there's only three classes in the game. They're all good for certain situations. Most of the time I'm Rifleman, despite the fact that the Japanese use what looks like a reverse engineered M1 Garand (I doubt they did that in real life) the fakeness doesn't get in the way of the fact that it's my fav class. Most of the time it's two shots to the chest
BF1943 has unlimited ammo, so what difference does it make to try to make the guns realistic?Longbow wrote:
Thats not about balance, thats about lazyness. In BF1942 japanese had 10 rounds in theur rufle while marines had 8, both rifles did the same damage. And it worked perfectly well. Imo if you are doing a game based on real conflict with real weaponry and vehicles, they should at least have realistic number of ammo, rpm and so on.War Man wrote:
Although its reloading is unrealistic as it reloads like the G41 and Lee Enfield in real life and also has 10 rounds not 8, but DICE had to balance it out that way.
Last edited by War Man (2009-07-11 09:41:27)
but you'll have to pay for these patches.Mekstizzle wrote:
Yeah, exactly. In BF1943 it reloads like the Garand, infact it's like the Garand in almost every single aspect. I guess they could've changed the model and the reloading yet still keep it all balanced. I have a feeling they're going to add stuff and change things around with patches later on, though.War Man wrote:
Um, they actually did try to develop clones/copies of the M1 Garand, but non of them ever entered service with the Japanese military. Only 250 were ever built anyway. The one used in bf1943 is the type 5. Although its reloading is unrealistic as it reloads like the G41 and Lee Enfield in real life and also has 10 rounds not 8, but DICE had to balance it out that way.Mekstizzle wrote:
It's actually by DICE. EA publish the game. Although EA bought DICE, it's still DICE, not EA.
I always find it funny when you have tards who don't understand simple things blaming EA for everything. You tell them about DICE and they have no idea what you're even talking about.
The game is actually quite good considering its price, and, I haven't played BF1942 properly or Vietnam, but I'd say it's one of the better balanced BF games out there.
Anyway there's only three classes in the game. They're all good for certain situations. Most of the time I'm Rifleman, despite the fact that the Japanese use what looks like a reverse engineered M1 Garand (I doubt they did that in real life) the fakeness doesn't get in the way of the fact that it's my fav class. Most of the time it's two shots to the chest
No you don't dumbass.Miggle wrote:
but you'll have to pay for these patches.Mekstizzle wrote:
Yeah, exactly. In BF1943 it reloads like the Garand, infact it's like the Garand in almost every single aspect. I guess they could've changed the model and the reloading yet still keep it all balanced. I have a feeling they're going to add stuff and change things around with patches later on, though.War Man wrote:
Um, they actually did try to develop clones/copies of the M1 Garand, but non of them ever entered service with the Japanese military. Only 250 were ever built anyway. The one used in bf1943 is the type 5. Although its reloading is unrealistic as it reloads like the G41 and Lee Enfield in real life and also has 10 rounds not 8, but DICE had to balance it out that way.
Negative.Miggle wrote:
but you'll have to pay for these patches.Mekstizzle wrote:
Yeah, exactly. In BF1943 it reloads like the Garand, infact it's like the Garand in almost every single aspect. I guess they could've changed the model and the reloading yet still keep it all balanced. I have a feeling they're going to add stuff and change things around with patches later on, though.War Man wrote:
Um, they actually did try to develop clones/copies of the M1 Garand, but non of them ever entered service with the Japanese military. Only 250 were ever built anyway. The one used in bf1943 is the type 5. Although its reloading is unrealistic as it reloads like the G41 and Lee Enfield in real life and also has 10 rounds not 8, but DICE had to balance it out that way.
In 42 one of the patches also gave the Garand to the Marines and gave the Japanese the Type 5.Longbow wrote:
Thats not about balance, thats about lazyness. In BF1942 japanese had 10 rounds in theur rufle while marines had 8, both rifles did the same damage. And it worked perfectly well. Imo if you are doing a game based on real conflict with real weaponry and vehicles, they should at least have realistic number of ammo, rpm and so on.War Man wrote:
Although its reloading is unrealistic as it reloads like the G41 and Lee Enfield in real life and also has 10 rounds not 8, but DICE had to balance it out that way.
That is what he is talking about MOABM.O.A.B wrote:
In 42 one of the patches also gave the Garand to the Marines and gave the Japanese the Type 5.Longbow wrote:
Thats not about balance, thats about lazyness. In BF1942 japanese had 10 rounds in theur rufle while marines had 8, both rifles did the same damage. And it worked perfectly well. Imo if you are doing a game based on real conflict with real weaponry and vehicles, they should at least have realistic number of ammo, rpm and so on.War Man wrote:
Although its reloading is unrealistic as it reloads like the G41 and Lee Enfield in real life and also has 10 rounds not 8, but DICE had to balance it out that way.
Ah, I could remember how many rounds the Type 5 had in 42.War Man wrote:
That is what he is talking about MOABM.O.A.B wrote:
In 42 one of the patches also gave the Garand to the Marines and gave the Japanese the Type 5.Longbow wrote:
Thats not about balance, thats about lazyness. In BF1942 japanese had 10 rounds in theur rufle while marines had 8, both rifles did the same damage. And it worked perfectly well. Imo if you are doing a game based on real conflict with real weaponry and vehicles, they should at least have realistic number of ammo, rpm and so on.
