Amen. Fuckin' amen.DeathUnlimited wrote:
As long as it stays arcade like BF2, yay! If it tries to be the next reality shooter (CoD like) I won't be happy.
Make it play like BF2, look like Crysis, and build it like CoD4.
Fun, sexy, and bug-free.
Amen. Fuckin' amen.DeathUnlimited wrote:
As long as it stays arcade like BF2, yay! If it tries to be the next reality shooter (CoD like) I won't be happy.
You know, if DICE guys had the same point of view as you, they would do only console games, where nobodys whinning and there is no piracy...AussieReaper wrote:
No, they won't do that till they start patching it.Chorcai wrote:
I don't know... me thinks they will fucks it up's
We can confirm that Battlefield 3 is currently in development but at this stage we have no further comments to add.
What I would like to see implemented, but not necessarily necessary for the game to be a success;Modern Warfare
Arcade style
Vast maps featuring numerous vehicles
Ranking system similar to BF2
Receive support for the mod and competitive scene
Better net-code than BF2. The game should feel like the recent CoD series, however it should not feel fake and cartoon-like like games such as Counter Strike.
Ingame chat & friends system
Ingame music player
Limit admins power of their servers, an admin should not have the right to simply ban somebody on 'accusations' or similar reasons. A properly run warning system would even work, where EA/Dice actually respond and get in contact with the server providers.
Don't make it like Crysis, oh please don't! The majority of BF-series gamers have med-low end PC's as the game does not require amazing specifications - don't have us waste our money on high-end products.
Last edited by Oisín | Irishpride (2009-06-11 04:52:10)
I agree with both of ye._Dominiko_PL wrote:
You know, if DICE guys had the same point of view as you, they would do only console games, where nobodys whinning and there is no piracy...AussieReaper wrote:
No, they won't do that till they start patching it.Chorcai wrote:
I don't know... me thinks they will fucks it up's
He lives on.Chorcai wrote:
I agree with both of ye._Dominiko_PL wrote:
You know, if DICE guys had the same point of view as you, they would do only console games, where nobodys whinning and there is no piracy...AussieReaper wrote:
No, they won't do that till they start patching it.
Balance is superiorDeathUnlimited wrote:
2142 is fucking shite?Sambuccashake wrote:
Finally!!!!
They tested and learned a looot of good stuff from 2142 so I'm quite certain that BF3 will be the FPS that will rule all!
I agree. There were a lot of subtle improvements in 2142.Sambuccashake wrote:
Balance is superior
Med packs and ammo packs work like they should
APM's work in a good way
No über powerful vehicles
Squad play makes you rank up faster
I believe they made a lot of progress that should be introduced in BF3.
Fair post. Concerning the net code part- can you please elaborate?Oisín | Irishpride wrote:
For it to be as successful as BF2 was, the game needs to be the following;What I would like to see implemented, but not necessarily necessary for the game to be a success;Modern Warfare
Arcade style
Vast maps featuring numerous vehicles
Ranking system similar to BF2
Receive support for the mod and competitive sceneBetter net-code than BF2. The game should feel like the recent CoD series, however it should not feel fake and cartoon-like like games such as Counter Strike.
Ingame chat & friends system
Ingame music player
Limit admins power of their servers, an admin should not have the right to simply ban somebody on 'accusations' or similar reasons. A properly run warning system would even work, where EA/Dice actually respond and get in contact with the server providers.
Don't make it like Crysis, oh please don't! The majority of BF-series gamers have med-low end PC's as the game does not require amazing specifications - don't have us waste our money on high-end products.
A lot of the stuff is modern day, they still use M16's in Iraq, the F35 is only just coming out of production, same with the J10.xBlackPantherx wrote:
It better fucking be modern day. Like actually modern day. Not where everyone is just using M4's and Mp7's. I want something like PoE except even more modern. At the very least: Mobile artillery, mortars maybe, new vehicles, a way larger assortment of weapons/items-something like 2142 would be great- and just up-to-date everything. Not up-to-date as in 5+ years ago. Maybe they should start watching futureweapons, some of the older episodes that has things that have been deployed.
Some of these would just be
The osprey (helicopter plane) would be fantastic. It's modern day, been deployed, has a modern day 2142 feel (attack ship).
So basically the douchebag at EA wasn't meant to let slip that BF3 is in the works. DICE have to confirm it, but not expand on it. GJ team.Fat_Swinub wrote:
And http://twitter.com/BattlefieldHQWe can confirm that Battlefield 3 is currently in development but at this stage we have no further comments to add.
lol BF2 was the most demanding game of 2005 what are you talking aboutOisín | Irishpride wrote:
Don't make it like Crysis, oh please don't! The majority of BF-series gamers have med-low end PC's as the game does not require amazing specifications - don't have us waste our money on high-end products.
maybe, but considering nearly all infantry players play on low-med graphics and most conquest players don't even play on all super high, an uber pc is hardly needed to run the gameFat_Swinub wrote:
lol BF2 was the most demanding game of 2005 what are you talking aboutOisín | Irishpride wrote:
Don't make it like Crysis, oh please don't! The majority of BF-series gamers have med-low end PC's as the game does not require amazing specifications - don't have us waste our money on high-end products.
War Man wrote:
As I said, BC2 is the BF3 SO QUIT WHINING "I WANT MY BF3" I AM GETTING FUCKING TIRED OF IT, I REALLY HATE SEEING THE VERY THING "BF3" NOW.
lolWar Man wrote:
The only bf3 your thinking of is bc2, all those rumors of bf3 was actually about bc2. There will not be a battlefield game with the 3(unless it is a different game outside the battlefield franchise) as bf 2 has the 2 only because it uses the second engine of the franchise
Owned.SamBo:D wrote:
War Man wrote:
As I said, BC2 is the BF3 SO QUIT WHINING "I WANT MY BF3" I AM GETTING FUCKING TIRED OF IT, I REALLY HATE SEEING THE VERY THING "BF3" NOW.lolWar Man wrote:
The only bf3 your thinking of is bc2, all those rumors of bf3 was actually about bc2. There will not be a battlefield game with the 3(unless it is a different game outside the battlefield franchise) as bf 2 has the 2 only because it uses the second engine of the franchise
Last edited by Cyrax-Sektor (2009-06-11 08:13:25)
I think either a separate AA kit or an AA option for the AT type kit would be good.Zukabazuka wrote:
If there are gonna be jets, I want to se something usefull against them or them being support power that SL calls in. Right now its pretty much uber to be in if you know how to fly and any resistance is very weak against you.
Better be PC exlusive. Also I'm sure it will use their new engine for BF3. So people playing on old PCs might need to upgrade. The question is now if I should buy BC2 or wait for BF3.