Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5919|College Park, MD

War Man wrote:

May I join when I get a new xbox?
no

Spoiler (highlight to read):
jk

Last edited by Hurricane2k9 (2009-02-07 09:50:58)

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
Gooners
Wiki Contributor
+2,700|6850

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

War Man wrote:

May I join when I get a new xbox?
no
*-(
Noobpatty
ʎʇʇɐdqoou
+194|6571|West NY

Longbow wrote:

War Man wrote:

Awesome, bad company for pc this time.
Lets just hope they'll get rid of 60 round mags and full auto M16...
Yep. I was thinking a while ago...how much more realistic the game would be if they just doubled damage and put magazines at actual capacities.
Volatile
Member
+252|6922|Sextupling in Empire

eagles1106 wrote:

I usually dont post here but the amount of stupidness in this thread is funny.  If you would read what's on the websites/etc, you would notice a couple of things.

Bf1943 only has 24 player support and 3 maps because it's a PREPARATION for BF:BC 2.  Basically they're releasing it over the summer for players to get used to the Frostbite engine being used on the PC to get people either prepared or more convinced to buy a more full release with the Frostbite engine, that being BF:BC 2 in the winter.

Neither games will be ported from anything.
Is this an assumption, or do you have links supporting your theory?

Someone can tie me down and shovel dog turds into my mouth, but it doesn't mean I'll eventually like it.

If It doesn't have at least 48 player support, It's not a battlefield game in my eyes.
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6931|Purplicious Wisconsin

Volatile wrote:

eagles1106 wrote:

I usually dont post here but the amount of stupidness in this thread is funny.  If you would read what's on the websites/etc, you would notice a couple of things.

Bf1943 only has 24 player support and 3 maps because it's a PREPARATION for BF:BC 2.  Basically they're releasing it over the summer for players to get used to the Frostbite engine being used on the PC to get people either prepared or more convinced to buy a more full release with the Frostbite engine, that being BF:BC 2 in the winter.

Neither games will be ported from anything.
Is this an assumption, or do you have links supporting your theory?

Someone can tie me down and shovel dog turds into my mouth, but it doesn't mean I'll eventually like it.

If It doesn't have at least 48 player support, It's not a battlefield game in my eyes.
No, instead it's a console battlefield game
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Miggle
FUCK UBISOFT
+1,411|6959|FUCK UBISOFT

War Man wrote:

Volatile wrote:

eagles1106 wrote:

I usually dont post here but the amount of stupidness in this thread is funny.  If you would read what's on the websites/etc, you would notice a couple of things.

Bf1943 only has 24 player support and 3 maps because it's a PREPARATION for BF:BC 2.  Basically they're releasing it over the summer for players to get used to the Frostbite engine being used on the PC to get people either prepared or more convinced to buy a more full release with the Frostbite engine, that being BF:BC 2 in the winter.

Neither games will be ported from anything.
Is this an assumption, or do you have links supporting your theory?

Someone can tie me down and shovel dog turds into my mouth, but it doesn't mean I'll eventually like it.

If It doesn't have at least 48 player support, It's not a battlefield game in my eyes.
No, instead it's a console battlefield game
Not a battlefield game.
https://i.imgur.com/86fodNE.png
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6755|Long Island, New York
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/47329.html

Trailer doesn't show much (see: anything), but it's a teaser/trailer nonetheless.
csmag
Member
+92|6664|Canada
That trailer was actually the most violent thing i've seen dice pump out. I mean blood, in a BF trailer? I though everyone bled dust in the Battlefield world!
bugz
Fission Mailed
+3,311|6529



Looks like a remake of BF2. I'm not complaining as long as the PC version has awsm graphics and better hitreg.

Last edited by ebug9 (2009-03-28 11:15:38)

Fat_Swinub
jaff
+125|6652
A remake of BF2? Without jets? With 24 man maximum? What crippled version of BF2 did you buy.
bugz
Fission Mailed
+3,311|6529

Fat_Swinub wrote:

A remake of BF2? Without jets? With 24 man maximum? What crippled version of BF2 did you buy.
Ok fine, a nerfed version of BF2. Happy now?
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|6767|UK

So bad company 2 is 24 player max?  Or you on about bad company
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6931|Purplicious Wisconsin
Pretty good teaser, definitely better than mw2's trailer. I am excited about this game, I hope they have different classes than in bc1.

Bell wrote:

So bad company 2 is 24 player max?  Or you on about bad company
Hopefully the PC version will be 64 player max.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Cyrax-Sektor
Official Battlefield fanboy
+240|6366|San Antonio, Texas

Bell wrote:

So bad company 2 is 24 player max?  Or you on about bad company
Well, it doesn't look too good player limit wise for this new engine. All Frostbite engine games that we know of have 24 players max. Namely Bad Company and 1943, both FB games. This new title, BC2, doesn't have any information yet regarding player limits.

We currently have no other information to prove or disprove of the fact that more than 24 players can be on a server simultaneously with this engine. It'd be a real pain if FB's player max is 24. I hope we get some more information, thus answers to our questions. I hope BC2 will have more than 24.

However, according to Wikipedia (not sure if we can trust them completely, but EA's been known to edit Wiki on occasion ):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlefield:_Bad_Company_2

Modified Frostbite Engine

2142 uses a modified Refractor 2 engine. It had some more features BF2 lacked, which used the same engine. In 2142, players can withstand slight movement on vehicles like the Titan, explosives could be picked up with G, widescreen support, buddy lists, and so on. I'm sure there are bigger changes others can point out.

Now I've never played 1942, but it's safe to assume BF2 uses a modified Refractor 2 engine from 1942 as well.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6717|so randum
quick question, why exactly is a 24p limit bad?
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6440|Escea

FatherTed wrote:

quick question, why exactly is a 24p limit bad?
You know I'm not really sure about that either, half the time on games with like 32 peeps and up you never see more than eight at a time anyway, unless its Kark IO or something. The servers would be easier to fill on 24 as well.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6717|so randum

M.O.A.B wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

quick question, why exactly is a 24p limit bad?
You know I'm not really sure about that either, half the time on games with like 32 peeps and up you never see more than eight at a time anyway, unless its Kark IO or something. The servers would be easier to fill on 24 as well.
Exactly.

64 players is a)demanding for servers/PC's/whatever.

Generally ends up as a spamfest, and getting 32 players to actually work together is 100% impossible

While it's rather nice being able to frag that many different people, there's no point for it. Some of the best games i ever had on BF2 were on 32p or less, on 16p/32p maps.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6931|Purplicious Wisconsin
I at least ask for 32 player max for PC version. Although 64 is nice, I hated the lag involved in it.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Sidsnot
Banned
+93|5780|Stoke, England

ebug9 wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AySFchHyz7Q

Looks like a remake of BF2. I'm not complaining as long as the PC version has awsm graphics and better hitreg.
how does that look anything like BF2?
Cyrax-Sektor
Official Battlefield fanboy
+240|6366|San Antonio, Texas
Chip-by-chip damage of cover. That'd be handy in Project Reality. It looks and sounds good, and this is probably the demo we were curious about earlier, but I hope it can match BF2's level of awesome.

Multiplayer info comes this E3. Thanks for the link, MOAB.
csmag
Member
+92|6664|Canada
I see optics in those screenshots! Maybe well get weapon customization!
aerodynamic
FOCKING HELL
+241|5971|Roma

Poseidon wrote:

Miggle wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

the biggest things missing from BFBC.
how about quality.
It's a lot more fun if you play it more than 2 days.
BFBC is a really good game for xbox360.
i just hate that fact that you need to empty a full mag to kill someone.
and that no prone thing is bullshit.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/8ea27f2d75b353b0a18b096ed75ec5e142da7cc2.png
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6931|Purplicious Wisconsin

aerodynamic wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Miggle wrote:


how about quality.
It's a lot more fun if you play it more than 2 days.
BFBC is a really good game for xbox360.
i just hate that fact that you need to empty a full mag to kill someone.
and that no prone thing is bullshit.
They got rid of prone to basically "Balance the classes" . Oh and you don't have to empty a full mag to kill someone, are you spraying like crazy or are you using a cqc gun at long range?
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
specialistx2324
hahahahahhaa
+244|6906|arica harbour
Bad company was alright in my book.. i doubt the new Bf game will be even better. EA/DICE should spend more time developing games instead of comming out with gay ass releases every year. Im waiting for those pathetic european fags/retards to make a BF game just as good if not better than BF2....

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard