Thats how long it takes to generate the page isnt it? if thats the case then the new site is faster...Poncho wrote:
i found a very serious bug, chuy!
you might take a better look at your coding, cause this aint shit!
http://home.wanadoo.nl/h.gaastra/bugje.gif
Some minor things I noticed:
The requirements for badges and stuff show the progress bar being at 100% instead of the checkmark.
When I hover over the accuracy for certain weapons, the details don't show up constantly, but just keep on flashing. Can't give you a screenshot of this as it's all some moving-thingy. Furthermore, it doesn't seem to be a problem with certain weapons. The first time I noticed it at the Knife accuracy-stats, then i refreshed and had it happening with AT/AA and Explosives accuracy.
That's all I found out.
PS.: Where have all the fancy graphs gone?
The requirements for badges and stuff show the progress bar being at 100% instead of the checkmark.
When I hover over the accuracy for certain weapons, the details don't show up constantly, but just keep on flashing. Can't give you a screenshot of this as it's all some moving-thingy. Furthermore, it doesn't seem to be a problem with certain weapons. The first time I noticed it at the Knife accuracy-stats, then i refreshed and had it happening with AT/AA and Explosives accuracy.
That's all I found out.
PS.: Where have all the fancy graphs gone?
hmm if it hasnt been already mentioned - the vehicle kd ratios are awfully flattering at the moment
First thing I noticed is that you have avoided choosing the Jackhammer till the last moment, good man.
Then I tried my own details... ...I got the expected message of:
Player is not in the database.
You have been placed in the queue for a stats update. You are currently 157th in line.
Wanting to see just how speedy things were I started tapping away on the F5 key.
The very next screen said:
Player is not in the database.
You have been placed in the queue for a stats update. You are currently 0th in line.
That was interesting, never been zeroth in line before
Hit again and page timed out, once more and it loaded.
Then I tried my own details... ...I got the expected message of:
Player is not in the database.
You have been placed in the queue for a stats update. You are currently 157th in line.
Wanting to see just how speedy things were I started tapping away on the F5 key.
The very next screen said:
Player is not in the database.
You have been placed in the queue for a stats update. You are currently 0th in line.
That was interesting, never been zeroth in line before
Hit again and page timed out, once more and it loaded.
Nice, and Jeez is it fast!
since my ISP decided to crap out, i must do stuff at school now, not good
What do you mean? Are they wrong somewhere?$kelet0r wrote:
hmm if it hasnt been already mentioned - the vehicle kd ratios are awfully flattering at the moment
@maef -- what browser/platform are you on?
@duffry -- Yes, the first number is a bug, it should have said 0th there too. The "0th" number means you're next. I should change that error then, eh? (The cause for the delay between 0 and updated is that right now the queue "siezes up" for 30 seconds once it's empty -- and with just a single forum topic about it, the queue is empty a lot.)
@all
TTA does appear to be messed up -- looks like i'm doing a bit much rounding on it.
Award display was COMPLETELY recoded, I'll change "met" things back to simple check marks.
Award REQ data is being updated -- I got the "master list" from DICE
Yes, page generation time went down (good thing) by better than a 10x factor. I imagine that margin will fall once the machine is under full load, but it's still much faster. Also, you can't see it, but the queue speed is DRAMATICALLY faster -- not only 12x faster on a single thread, but multithreading actually acts as a multiplier to the update speed now. EG: 2 threads == 2x speed, 3 threads = 3x speed. I tested it all the way up to 20 threads without any noticeable lag in the speed of individual threads. However, running 20 threads made me hit the EA limit of 8 stat queries per second in about 30 seconds
History graphs ARE NOT LOST -- they get their own, snazzy page now. Each stat not only gets the full graph from before, but two NEW graphs of hotness. It's not quite ready yet, but I'll definately be showing it this upcoming weekend.
THANK YOU ALL for your input and help.
What he means is that the vehicle kill/death ratios are now calculated as (kills + road kills) / deaths, giving an inflated figure.$kelet0r wrote:
hmm if it hasnt been already mentioned - the vehicle kd ratios are awfully flattering at the moment
I prefer the old method, since most of my "road kills" are actually people bailing from vehicles I've shot with AT rockets. I consider them part of my AT rocket kills rather than my tank/helicopter/AA kills etc.
On another note:
I can see the little black bar under my Expert Pistol badge (indicating that I'm eligible to earn it)... but I've already received it.
As others have mentioned, I apparently qualify for the Navy SEALs Special Service Medal, yet I only have one hour as SEALs.
Last edited by Gulf_War_Syndrome (2006-03-20 16:32:13)
I prefer the vehicle KDR to include the road kills, a road kill is when you run over someone in a vehicle. The road kills from air vehicles are generally from ramming into vehicles and killing them, or like myself flying low over runways cleaning up multiple people.
I like it :]
A dumb question that could be answered elsewhere - Do IAR requirements have to be fullfilled after all the other requirements or are they kept track of autonomously?
A dumb question that could be answered elsewhere - Do IAR requirements have to be fullfilled after all the other requirements or are they kept track of autonomously?
IAR must be completed after the timed requirements.
lol next rank in
Score: 4,707 of 5,000. At your historical rate, you should earn 293 in 17 days (or 00:00:15 straight).
sing Hallelujah sing it sing Hallelujahchuyskywalker wrote:
Award REQ data is being updated -- I got the "master list" from DICE
well that certainly puts the kybosh on the 5hr spec forces ribbon threads!!!!!!!!
thank god.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
First link is correct and it's working fine here.
For me it says:
Edit: IE don't work. Nor does Firefox.
Help, Admins!
I'll try with IE, hang on.Avant browser wrote:
Oops, we can't open the web page you requested ...
- Error 404 - The web page you typed in could not be found on the internet.
Edit: IE don't work. Nor does Firefox.
Help, Admins!
Last edited by Spark (2006-03-20 22:59:09)
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
add a slash on the end of the first link.
Ah. Cool. Thanks.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Firefox 1.5 on Windows XP SP2.chuyskywalker wrote:
@maef -- what browser/platform are you on?
So, nothing unusual on my set-up I think.
Saw this today....
The empty line, with 90000 to go is wrong, I know I've already met the 25hr requirement.
The empty line, with 90000 to go is wrong, I know I've already met the 25hr requirement.
Nice work Chuy, just a few things:
1) What is happening with the signatures?
2) Why do I keep coming up as 0th in line and not getting stats?
3) Under some of the badges is a small grey line, what's with that?
4) Will you be replacing the global ranking with a fairer system soon (like k/d ratio + w/l ratio + accuracy divided by three to get either a really good accurate all rounder score or something that bad it'd make you eye bleed, yes I did flunk math).
5) Can you make it so we can pick color theme's for the ranking page, just on our own computer?
1) What is happening with the signatures?
2) Why do I keep coming up as 0th in line and not getting stats?
3) Under some of the badges is a small grey line, what's with that?
4) Will you be replacing the global ranking with a fairer system soon (like k/d ratio + w/l ratio + accuracy divided by three to get either a really good accurate all rounder score or something that bad it'd make you eye bleed, yes I did flunk math).
5) Can you make it so we can pick color theme's for the ranking page, just on our own computer?
That is an indicator to show you which awards you are eligible for, but haven't yet met the IAR requirements.Whitegreek wrote:
3) Under some of the badges is a small grey line, what's with that?
looks great!
some bugs (all in the time to next rank):
Next Rank: 2nd Lieutenant
95.53%Score: 57,319 of 60,000. At your historical rate, you should earn 2 in 11 days (or 00:01:02 straight).
I will need 11 days to earn 2 point? eh?
lol ?? fix it PLZ
some bugs (all in the time to next rank):
Next Rank: 2nd Lieutenant
95.53%Score: 57,319 of 60,000. At your historical rate, you should earn 2 in 11 days (or 00:01:02 straight).
I will need 11 days to earn 2 point? eh?
lol ?? fix it PLZ
>>>BF3 Central<<<
Why Are my Enemys Different?
Gibson----
Regular----
Gibson----
Regular----
The thing where the flag isn't where it's supposed to be has been fixed so that's pretty good too.