BF2S Forums Is CoD 4 a clan game or a public game?

.Sup wrote:

both

TBH.

It depends on how you want to play.  The teamwork aspects of CoD4 are minimal as opposed to BF2, the only realy way to effectively use teamwork would be to play domination as a loosely based squad...since there aren't any "official" squads, it's just a bunch of people with decked-out weapons charging the other group of people with decked-out weapons.

Personally, I play public CoD4 by myself, and play BF2 with a clan.  A few of my clan buddies have CoD4, but they rarely play it.

Last edited by TopHat01 (2009-01-19 11:08:24)

Public game, for a clan you're better off in CS.

works well as a non srs srs game if that makes sense.

Lot more CQC than BF2, teamwork helps.

Lots of very very very teamwork orientated modes (SnD) which you can't do as a lonewolf.

Its good for playing with a few mates, put it that way

jord wrote:

The options aren't even the choices in the question.. You can just vote "Yes"... Yes what?

And it's both, obviously. What are you stoned?

Basically CoD4 is only about who gets correct aim first.

FatherTed wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

Basically CoD4 is only about who gets correct aim first.

isn't that sort of a good thing for an FPS?

People bitch about halo for example cause you can get the first shots off, and still get killed

Compare it to BF2, where good aim means nothing if you get capped out by a team with good tactics and teamwork.

DeathUnlimited wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

Basically CoD4 is only about who gets correct aim first.

isn't that sort of a good thing for an FPS?

People bitch about halo for example cause you can get the first shots off, and still get killed

Compare it to BF2, where good aim means nothing if you get capped out by a team with good tactics and teamwork.

Same can be said about CoD4, ie when you have a good team who know how and where to dominate a map. Makes it impossible for the opposition to even think about coordinating something

DeathUnlimited wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

DeathUnlimited wrote:

Basically CoD4 is only about who gets correct aim first.

isn't that sort of a good thing for an FPS?

People bitch about halo for example cause you can get the first shots off, and still get killed

Compare it to BF2, where good aim means nothing if you get capped out by a team with good tactics and teamwork.

Or people with reg. reg > aim in a one on one. But true, you can win matches without killing many people so...

Cod4: More than 5 vs 5 on any map is a piss take, pre-nades are fucking spammed in more than 5 vs 5. Most competitive CoD4 teams have 5 players.

JoshP wrote:

i have yet to play a good s&d match (i've only had cod4 for like 3 weeks) with teamwork n shit

Don't expect to get megachegga teamwork like in BF2.

Mint Sauce wrote:

Obviously the clan aspect of cod4 is very active at the moment, but opposed to a game like bf2, it requires alot less teamwork. In cod4, one good player can win it for a team, but in bf2 one good player means nothing if you're up against a team who have superior teamwork. People will hate on me for saying this as well, but cod4 takes less skill.

btw, bf2 = gamesense, not skill, honestly, you are right, cod4 is an easy game.

Skilled games: Quake3, CS:S, Cod:uo - 2 and more..but not many. Games are made easier so more people play them. CS:S is an exception to that with lots of mods and game types...FUN FUN FUN

But BF2 can be quite skillful at times...EG. Jets, Helis, Tankers, People with Aim/good reg can tear it apart.

This is where Religious Studies comes in handy.

He gave an example of Spiritual Truth. Spiritual truth, is a truth of personal experience, so you maybe didn't experience teamwork in BF2, he did. Vice versa.

Do i win?

So good, amirite?

Well there is no such thing, as "truth", the is always something that *witty word here* ( can't think of it )