let it run for a little. Usually most reporting problems fix themselves. Did you download the newest projects? What does the fahlog.txt file say?
Last edited by max (2008-10-02 13:31:07)
Last edited by max (2008-10-02 13:31:07)
F@H takes forever to start up in the beginning. For the CPU client, give it at least several hours to start updating. If you leave it on overnight and still are at 0.00%, then something is wrong. Otherwise, give it a chance to get running.ilinear wrote:
Well, it's reporting now, but nothing on the client box ( with progress, name, ETA etc) has changed, still yellow with N/A and 0.00 on the ppd column.
Do you need to complete one project for it to work?
And yeah, i downloaded the newest projects before anything else on FahMon.
I'll let it be overnight and see what happens.
Also, is there any major performance difference when you leave the folding client on overnight on its own, and if you left it on with torrents up?
Last edited by ilinear (2008-10-03 00:08:16)
My E7200 is making 1700PPD with a GPU client runningmax wrote:
OMG OMG OMG. My [email protected] is doing 6743 ppd on an A2 2669 WU
in sad news, my e5200 is currently doing 1k ppd with the windows smp client
right now my 4800 is doing ~235 on each core. I'd like to know what yours does though, to compare.Freezer7Pro wrote:
My E7200 is making 1700PPD with a GPU client runningmax wrote:
OMG OMG OMG. My [email protected] is doing 6743 ppd on an A2 2669 WU
in sad news, my e5200 is currently doing 1k ppd with the windows smp client
Can't wait to see what my 4800+ is gonna make.
I'm gonna run SMP, you're running regular. On averege, SMP creates about 3-4 times more PPD than regular.GGF0RCE wrote:
right now my 4800 is doing ~235 on each core. I'd like to know what yours does though, to compare.Freezer7Pro wrote:
My E7200 is making 1700PPD with a GPU client runningmax wrote:
OMG OMG OMG. My [email protected] is doing 6743 ppd on an A2 2669 WU
in sad news, my e5200 is currently doing 1k ppd with the windows smp client
Can't wait to see what my 4800+ is gonna make.
a single core of my 4800+ is doing about 200ppd. Then again even a single core client is bogged down by the GPUsGGF0RCE wrote:
right now my 4800 is doing ~235 on each core. I'd like to know what yours does though, to compare.Freezer7Pro wrote:
My E7200 is making 1700PPD with a GPU client runningmax wrote:
OMG OMG OMG. My [email protected] is doing 6743 ppd on an A2 2669 WU
in sad news, my e5200 is currently doing 1k ppd with the windows smp client
Can't wait to see what my 4800+ is gonna make.
Why not SMP? It should keep up.max wrote:
a single core of my 4800+ is doing about 200ppd. Then again even a single core client is bogged down by the GPUsGGF0RCE wrote:
right now my 4800 is doing ~235 on each core. I'd like to know what yours does though, to compare.Freezer7Pro wrote:
My E7200 is making 1700PPD with a GPU client running
Can't wait to see what my 4800+ is gonna make.
500-1000PPD may not be all that much, but in your own words:max wrote:
It doesn't really net me more points. The uniprocessor client is a nice systray one instead of having to deal with yet another SMP one fucking with me
Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2008-10-10 15:26:18)
it's another 100 or so. SMP'ing on a slow core that's overloaded by GPUs doesn't seem to work well.Freezer7Pro wrote:
500-1000PPD may not be all that much, but in your own words:max wrote:
It doesn't really net me more points. The uniprocessor client is a nice systray one instead of having to deal with yet another SMP one fucking with me
http://cheapskate.xlschool.com/wp-conte … _small.jpg
Big surprisemax wrote:
Guess I won the race to 2 million points
http://fah-web.stanford.edu/awards/cert … ts=2049643