Slow people say thatnukchebi0 wrote:
Mmkay, although I don't see why lying about a score that isn't impressive gains me anything.
Here is proof...
Broke 11 second barrier finally
on E8500 3.16 @ 4.256GHz, it's in safe mode btw, hence no Multiplier or Bus speed showing
on E8500 3.16 @ 4.256GHz, it's in safe mode btw, hence no Multiplier or Bus speed showing
The Sheriff wrote:
Broke 11 second barrier finally
http://i101.photobucket.com/albums/m48/ … perpi2.png
on E8500 3.16 @ 4.256GHz, it's in safe mode btw, hence no Multiplier or Bus speed showing
Jesus Christ, Surgeons.
So what vcore did you use then?The Sheriff wrote:
Broke 11 second barrier finally
http://i101.photobucket.com/albums/m48/ … perpi2.png
on E8500 3.16 @ 4.256GHz, it's in safe mode btw, hence no Multiplier or Bus speed showing
Well, in BIOS it was set at 1.4000, but it was showing on cpuz as 1.368, is that actually at 1.4 or is it safe to continue because it was actually 1.368?
Whatever BIOS says is correct.
Good job I didn't go higher then.Sup wrote:
Whatever BIOS says is correct.
Wrong. The CPU-Z, or BIOS voltage monitor are correct. Not the setting..Sup wrote:
Whatever BIOS says is correct.
Will update chart tomorrow.
Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2008-08-24 13:48:23)
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Did I say the setting? BIOS monitor off course. Gawd.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Wrong. The CPU-Z, or BIOS voltage monitor are correct. Not the setting..Sup wrote:
Whatever BIOS says is correct.
Will update chart tomorrow.
The setting is what "BIOS" was in this context..Sup wrote:
Did I say the setting? BIOS monitor off course. Gawd.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Wrong. The CPU-Z, or BIOS voltage monitor are correct. Not the setting..Sup wrote:
Whatever BIOS says is correct.
Will update chart tomorrow.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Is CPU-Z actually correct? I'm always pretty sceptical about it, seems miles off.
Tbh, Overclocking isn't that hard, I thought I'd atleast set something on fire.
One of the most reliable programs there is.ghettoperson wrote:
Is CPU-Z actually correct? I'm always pretty sceptical about it, seems miles off.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
I'm worried cybargs might rape me irl now
I think it calls for an update.
When I upgrade I'm going to raep all of you
Not with a Q9550, you aren't.Poseidon wrote:
When I upgrade I'm going to raep all of you
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
You heard the nerd (lol rhyme, no offence Freezer).Freezer7Pro wrote:
Not with a Q9550, you aren't.Poseidon wrote:
When I upgrade I'm going to raep all of you
I'm a fat nerdThe Sheriff wrote:
You heard the nerd (lol rhyme, no offence Freezer).Freezer7Pro wrote:
Not with a Q9550, you aren't.Poseidon wrote:
When I upgrade I'm going to raep all of you
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Freezer7Pro wrote:
I'm a fat nerdThe Sheriff wrote:
You heard the nerd (lol rhyme, no offence Freezer).Freezer7Pro wrote:
Not with a Q9550, you aren't.
?
nig prz i got shit you dont even know about im like fuckin obama you heard meFreezer7Pro wrote:
Not with a Q9550, you aren't.Poseidon wrote:
When I upgrade I'm going to raep all of you
I beat an azn, there is no hope for youPoseidon wrote:
nig prz i got shit you dont even know about im like fuckin obama you heard meFreezer7Pro wrote:
Not with a Q9550, you aren't.Poseidon wrote:
When I upgrade I'm going to raep all of you
no, there's no hope for CN117The Sheriff wrote:
I beat an azn, there is no hope for youPoseidon wrote:
nig prz i got shit you dont even know about im like fuckin obama you heard meFreezer7Pro wrote:
Not with a Q9550, you aren't.
azn failure
tbh
jews can compute things with their fucking hair
you heard me
Last edited by Poseidon (2008-08-24 15:31:56)
I'll set cybargs on you, you're under the age of consent.
