No, when you are right I can admit it. Crysis doesn't deserve a 2, but it doesn't deserve a 9 or 10 IMO either. And just for the record, did you notice that I didn't post anything at all about X360? I can keep my word.Poseidon wrote:
You give up too easy, Serge. It's fun debating with you.
The only game I've ever played that deserves anything less than a 4 is Superman Returns, which I gave a 3.
Well, good on you for swallowing your pride and admitting to do so. Not many people on here can do that, so a +1 do you when I get some karma back.sergeriver wrote:
No, when you are right I can admit it. Crysis doesn't deserve a 2, but it doesn't deserve a 9 or 10 IMO either. And just for the record, did you notice that I didn't post anything at all about X360? I can keep my word.Poseidon wrote:
You give up too easy, Serge. It's fun debating with you.
The only game I've ever played that deserves anything less than a 4 is Superman Returns, which I gave a 3.
And yes, I did notice that. Another good on you.
I figure I might as well add a mod in as well:
Eternal Silence - 8
Eternal Silence - 8
That mod is awesome.
I could review all 126 of my pc games but i think i won't..
That mod is awesome.
I could review all 126 of my pc games but i think i won't..
Definitely. I just don't think the graphics were up to par with what they could have been, and the flight controls are kinda sketchy. If you play with a joystick, it improves it so much though. Lots o' fun to be had there.Vilham wrote:
Eternal Silence - 8
That mod is awesome.
I could review all 126 of my pc games but i think i won't..
Hey Smeaggle put my TDUnlimited rating in that friggin-awsm table.
I think we should review new games only, otherwise we'll have hundreds of games on the list. We can make exceptions with games like HL or BF2 though.Vilham wrote:
Eternal Silence - 8
That mod is awesome.
I could review all 126 of my pc games but i think i won't..
for a console fps bad company was amazing. But I play fps games on PC and it was missing a bunch of really important stuff, not to mention being incredibly boring.Poseidon wrote:
Because fuck man, the people who gave the low scores were Sam and Miggle.sergeriver wrote:
I didn't see you bitching about people giving below 5 to BF:BC. Check the scores they gave to it.Poseidon wrote:
that was a fucking awesome analogy, Docta
well done
:S
But yeah, no game deserves anything below a 5 or 6 unless it is TRULY terrible. Like, I dunno...Big Rigs: Off The Road racing.
THAT deserves a 1. CoD4 a 1? Yeah, right. Crysis a 2? Gimme a break.
Sam is...well, Sam is Sam...
And Miggle hates console FPS's (no matter what they are) so I can't really argue with him.
I gave a worse score to resistance which was absolutely horrid. Worse than halo imo.
I found the multiplayer quite fun when I was at a friend's house playing with 3 mates, but ofc that was only about an hour or so, the shake away those effects was kinda fun although it felt really gimmicky , Halo 3 was indeed better multiplayerMiggle wrote:
for a console fps bad company was amazing. But I play fps games on PC and it was missing a bunch of really important stuff, not to mention being incredibly boring.Poseidon wrote:
Because fuck man, the people who gave the low scores were Sam and Miggle.sergeriver wrote:
I didn't see you bitching about people giving below 5 to BF:BC. Check the scores they gave to it.
Sam is...well, Sam is Sam...
And Miggle hates console FPS's (no matter what they are) so I can't really argue with him.
I gave a worse score to resistance which was absolutely horrid. Worse than halo imo.
I think most other peoples scoring is retardedVilham wrote:
That's why as I said above, if the number of reviews per game is lower than another games you shouldn't value the score as highly. Its up to people to decide if they think a game score based on one person is valid or not. I personally wouldn't and I think most other people wouldn't either.Poseidon wrote:
And that's why "reviews" shouldn't be based on one person.Miggle wrote:
In Vilham's opinion it does.
Hell, actually, Vilham gave a fair score. A 6 for a game he doesn't really like is pretty fair.
Anyway enough derailing of this thread from me.
Although I have to agree that Sams scoring is fucking retarded.
Giving out 10/10, 10/10 means its perfect, which no game is
as for portal people overate it because it was something different, although it had ok gameplay, ok gfx, no story whatsoever, it took about 1 hour to complete and the entire "cake is a lie" part wasnt funny at all
I beg to differ, DK2 is perfect.
Portals gameplay is UNIQUE, im pretty sure that alone gives it a score of 10 in gameplay, then maybe you think it gets 1 in story, 6 in graphics, 1 in length, thats still an average of 4.5, and the fact that it cost absolutely fucking nothing kinda negates ur "it only took 1 hour" which btw is bullshit, first time through it took 2 hours atleast.
You can really only bitch about how long a game is if it costs as much as other games. Portal didn't thus negating one of your entire points.
You score is stupid, you can continue with your little bitch session about the game but no one is taking your opinion seriously or you can man up like serge did and admit your score was bitchy.
Portals gameplay is UNIQUE, im pretty sure that alone gives it a score of 10 in gameplay, then maybe you think it gets 1 in story, 6 in graphics, 1 in length, thats still an average of 4.5, and the fact that it cost absolutely fucking nothing kinda negates ur "it only took 1 hour" which btw is bullshit, first time through it took 2 hours atleast.
You can really only bitch about how long a game is if it costs as much as other games. Portal didn't thus negating one of your entire points.
You score is stupid, you can continue with your little bitch session about the game but no one is taking your opinion seriously or you can man up like serge did and admit your score was bitchy.
Last edited by Vilham (2008-08-21 11:20:34)
lol
i wish i could man up on an internet forum talking about really serious video games
Ive never played Dk2 but it can't be perfect
i wish i could man up on an internet forum talking about really serious video games
Ive never played Dk2 but it can't be perfect
Obviously not, however it is easily one of my favourites, an neither is Bioshock the shitest game ever even though it massively disappointed me.
So basically is what your saying is you can't back up what your claiming? Then stop typing. Your boring.
So basically is what your saying is you can't back up what your claiming? Then stop typing. Your boring.
calm the fuck down
i think portal is shit end of
its called an opinion
i think portal is shit end of
its called an opinion
indeed. One apparently you can't back up. Yawn...
i did
too short
no story
overrated because it was something new
too short
no story
overrated because it was something new
Portal shit? Wait, the same portal that comes with the OB? Naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah.SamTheMan:D wrote:
calm the fuck down
i think portal is shit end of
its called an opinion
Because apparentely, for $20, and even though it's incredibly funny, creative, innovative and generally great, it has to be longer than 5 hours to be considered good.
Come on, Sam.
Come on, Sam.
im srs
it wasnt that good at all
maybe 2 was harsh, 4/10 or 5 max
it wasnt that good at all
maybe 2 was harsh, 4/10 or 5 max
Did you escape? I don't know anyone that doesn't love the game.SamTheMan:D wrote:
im srs
it wasnt that good at all
maybe 2 was harsh, 4/10 or 5 max
HL2 - 8.5
HL1 - 8
ArmA - 8.5
Company of Heroes - 9
BF2 - 8
BF2142 - 7.5
Trackmania - 7
Combat Arms - 7
Audiosurf - 7.5
BFV - 8
CSS - 7
Crysis - 7.5
CoD 4 - 8
Bioshock - 5 (seriously I dont get what was so good about it)
WIC - 6
HL1 - 8
ArmA - 8.5
Company of Heroes - 9
BF2 - 8
BF2142 - 7.5
Trackmania - 7
Combat Arms - 7
Audiosurf - 7.5
BFV - 8
CSS - 7
Crysis - 7.5
CoD 4 - 8
Bioshock - 5 (seriously I dont get what was so good about it)
WIC - 6