Last edited by No/Yes (2008-06-07 17:06:21)
Yeah I gave that a go last night it was madness....S.Lythberg wrote:
I try to keep it under 10v10
but ive seen 54 man servers, wtf?
54 man shipment is always fun.xRBLx wrote:
Yeah I gave that a go last night it was madness....S.Lythberg wrote:
I try to keep it under 10v10
but ive seen 54 man servers, wtf?
Campers/sprayers/spwan killers.
What interface are you talking about? And the console version isn't any better with more people it's the same as PC spam spam spam thats all that it is. I pub'd this game when it first came out for 1 month then I got bored and went to competition, and tbh I haven't had more fun with a game I haven't got bored with it, 5v5 is the way to go.StormEye wrote:
CoD4 is originally designed for console. Just look at the fucking interface...
Which means that it just generally does not suit mass multiplaying style of FPS anyway (There is Frontline FoW, but that is basically copy of BF2142...).
If CoD4 was designed primarily for PC, it would be much well suited for higher number of player limits.
However, that is my opinion and I am pretty sure other will feel otherwise.
If you did not get the meaning of my post, it meant that CoD4 is NOT suited for large player numbers. Please read more carefully.Johnny_Extremer wrote:
What interface are you talking about? And the console version isn't any better with more people it's the same as PC spam spam spam thats all that it is. I pub'd this game when it first came out for 1 month then I got bored and went to competition, and tbh I haven't had more fun with a game I haven't got bored with it, 5v5 is the way to go.StormEye wrote:
CoD4 is originally designed for console. Just look at the fucking interface...
Which means that it just generally does not suit mass multiplaying style of FPS anyway (There is Frontline FoW, but that is basically copy of BF2142...).
If CoD4 was designed primarily for PC, it would be much well suited for higher number of player limits.
However, that is my opinion and I am pretty sure other will feel otherwise.
The menu set up and interfaces are totally different IMO. Plus they only let consoles have smaller games because the majority of console jockeys can't process enough information to shoot and think about the crap they are spewing into the mic at the same time.StormEye wrote:
If you did not get the meaning of my post, it meant that CoD4 is NOT suited for large player numbers. Please read more carefully.Johnny_Extremer wrote:
What interface are you talking about? And the console version isn't any better with more people it's the same as PC spam spam spam thats all that it is. I pub'd this game when it first came out for 1 month then I got bored and went to competition, and tbh I haven't had more fun with a game I haven't got bored with it, 5v5 is the way to go.StormEye wrote:
CoD4 is originally designed for console. Just look at the fucking interface...
Which means that it just generally does not suit mass multiplaying style of FPS anyway (There is Frontline FoW, but that is basically copy of BF2142...).
If CoD4 was designed primarily for PC, it would be much well suited for higher number of player limits.
However, that is my opinion and I am pretty sure other will feel otherwise.
Interface that I am talking about is such as the in-game menu. Example for this is in menu system, it is designed with console controls in mind, where each object is accessible with pushing stick up and down the menu, press accept, press up and down further, press accept, press up and down again, repeat...
Last edited by Spark (2008-06-10 01:49:06)
Every CoD has been like that.StormEye wrote:
If you did not get the meaning of my post, it meant that CoD4 is NOT suited for large player numbers. Please read more carefully.Johnny_Extremer wrote:
What interface are you talking about? And the console version isn't any better with more people it's the same as PC spam spam spam thats all that it is. I pub'd this game when it first came out for 1 month then I got bored and went to competition, and tbh I haven't had more fun with a game I haven't got bored with it, 5v5 is the way to go.StormEye wrote:
CoD4 is originally designed for console. Just look at the fucking interface...
Which means that it just generally does not suit mass multiplaying style of FPS anyway (There is Frontline FoW, but that is basically copy of BF2142...).
If CoD4 was designed primarily for PC, it would be much well suited for higher number of player limits.
However, that is my opinion and I am pretty sure other will feel otherwise.
Interface that I am talking about is such as the in-game menu. Example for this is in menu system, it is designed with console controls in mind, where each object is accessible with pushing stick up and down the menu, press accept, press up and down further, press accept, press up and down again, repeat...