He looks a bit ... fat, for want of a better word. But gj though.M.O.A.B wrote:
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/7883/captfz6.jpg
Man haven't churned out this many drawings for a long long time.
Bulky gear and a CamelBak on his back
Your best one so far I think,.. but who ate his shoelaces?M.O.A.B wrote:
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/7883/captfz6.jpg
Man haven't churned out this many drawings for a long long time.
lol, haven't quite finished it yetLai wrote:
Your best one so far I think,.. but who ate his shoelaces?M.O.A.B wrote:
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/7883/captfz6.jpg
Man haven't churned out this many drawings for a long long time.
Not great, even worse picture, took it on my webcam. If anyone wants a higher res just shout, but it's nothing special.
You should give him an optical or collimating sight as well; anyone who can get his or her hands on a SCAR probably won't use the ironsight unless in an emergency.M.O.A.B wrote:
lol, haven't quite finished it yetLai wrote:
Your best one so far I think,.. but who ate his shoelaces?M.O.A.B wrote:
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/7883/captfz6.jpg
Man haven't churned out this many drawings for a long long time.
Here are some pieces from my collection.
Last edited by Icleos (2008-05-06 15:48:36)
Very nice Icleos.
reminds me of S.T.A.L.K.E.R.
I like the rose
Main guy with MP7 (at Lance's request )
Must be very incomfortable to carry a P90 like that though
Tru, but the P90 isn't a large or particularly heavy gun and for a strong guy it wouldn't be too much of a hinderence .Lai wrote:
Must be very incomfortable to carry a P90 like that though
same dude with lack of gear
Go find human reference. Those faces need some work.
Scanner fails at picking up detail.
That one with the MP7 is awsm!
Your faces are just fine
Your faces are just fine
M.O.A.B wrote:
http://img128.imageshack.us/img128/1669/pict0239lz2.jpg
Scanner fails at picking up detail.
If that picture was your way of disagreeing with me.... it didn't work. The proportions are off and shapes are generic and plain. Really, just use reference, even if you have to trace the first few times, and see the difference in your work. You need to pay more attention to the position of features relative to each other and their size. Also, some value wouldn't hurt.OmniDeath wrote:
Go find human reference. Those faces need some work.
That drawing above is an almost exact copy of a picture of myself, like I said little detail is lost by the scanner. Besides I drew each of these in a space of about 15 minutes, as character concepts, wasn't really aiming for absolute perfection. I must have an out of proportioned and plain face .OmniDeath wrote:
M.O.A.B wrote:
http://img128.imageshack.us/img128/1669/pict0239lz2.jpg
Scanner fails at picking up detail.If that picture was your way of disagreeing with me.... it didn't work. The proportions are off and shapes are generic and plain. Really, just use reference, even if you have to trace the first few times, and see the difference in your work. You need to pay more attention to the position of features relative to each other and their size. Also, some value wouldn't hurt.OmniDeath wrote:
Go find human reference. Those faces need some work.
I've never met someone so stubborn that they didn't want to better them self.M.O.A.B wrote:
That drawing above is an almost exact copy of a picture of myself, like I said little detail is lost by the scanner. Besides I drew each of these in a space of about 15 minutes, as character concepts, wasn't really aiming for absolute perfection. I must have an out of proportioned and plain face .OmniDeath wrote:
M.O.A.B wrote:
http://img128.imageshack.us/img128/1669/pict0239lz2.jpg
Scanner fails at picking up detail.If that picture was your way of disagreeing with me.... it didn't work. The proportions are off and shapes are generic and plain. Really, just use reference, even if you have to trace the first few times, and see the difference in your work. You need to pay more attention to the position of features relative to each other and their size. Also, some value wouldn't hurt.OmniDeath wrote:
Go find human reference. Those faces need some work.
http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/3043/pict0199ul2.jpg
I can draw stuff a hell of a lot better than that, but as I said I drew each of them in like 15 mins. Just the way you typed sounded more like you were looking down on me. 'Go find human reference. Those faces need some work' gave me the impression of 'thats crap do it again'. Might not be what you meant but that's how it sounds.OmniDeath wrote:
I've never met someone so stubborn that they didn't want to better them self.M.O.A.B wrote:
That drawing above is an almost exact copy of a picture of myself, like I said little detail is lost by the scanner. Besides I drew each of these in a space of about 15 minutes, as character concepts, wasn't really aiming for absolute perfection. I must have an out of proportioned and plain face .OmniDeath wrote:
If that picture was your way of disagreeing with me.... it didn't work. The proportions are off and shapes are generic and plain. Really, just use reference, even if you have to trace the first few times, and see the difference in your work. You need to pay more attention to the position of features relative to each other and their size. Also, some value wouldn't hurt.M.O.A.B wrote:
http://img128.imageshack.us/img128/1669/pict0239lz2.jpg
Scanner fails at picking up detail.
http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/3043/pict0199ul2.jpg
I think you have a lot of potential to be very good, I was merely offering advice on how to better your work. Take it how you want to.M.O.A.B wrote:
I can draw stuff a hell of a lot better than that, but as I said I drew each of them in like 15 mins. Just the way you typed sounded more like you were looking down on me. 'Go find human reference. Those faces need some work' gave me the impression of 'thats crap do it again'. Might not be what you meant but that's how it sounds.OmniDeath wrote:
I've never met someone so stubborn that they didn't want to better them self.M.O.A.B wrote:
That drawing above is an almost exact copy of a picture of myself, like I said little detail is lost by the scanner. Besides I drew each of these in a space of about 15 minutes, as character concepts, wasn't really aiming for absolute perfection. I must have an out of proportioned and plain face .
http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/3043/pict0199ul2.jpg
no u.OmniDeath wrote:
I think you have a lot of potential to be very good, I was merely offering advice on how to better your work. Take it how you want to.M.O.A.B wrote:
I can draw stuff a hell of a lot better than that, but as I said I drew each of them in like 15 mins. Just the way you typed sounded more like you were looking down on me. 'Go find human reference. Those faces need some work' gave me the impression of 'thats crap do it again'. Might not be what you meant but that's how it sounds.OmniDeath wrote:
I've never met someone so stubborn that they didn't want to better them self.
muahahaha.
Nice work Iceos was it?
A joy looking through this thread every once in a while
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
something I've just started doing, man the scanner doesnt half rape the finer lines