DefCon-17
Maple Syrup Faggot
+362|6385|Vancouver | Canada
It is currently against international law to coerce people to register their work for copyright because there are so many inherent problems with it. But because big business can push through laws in the United States, our country is about to break with the rest of the world, again, and take your rights away.

With the tens of millions of photos and pieces of artwork created each year, the bounty for forcing everyone to pay a registration fee would be enormous. We lose our rights and our creations, and someone else makes money at our expense.

This includes every sketch, painting, photo, sculpture, drawing, video, song and every other type of creative endeavor. All of it is at risk!

If the Orphan Works legislation passes, you and I and all creatives will lose virtually all the rights to not only our future work but to everything we've created over the past 34 years, unless we register it with the new, untested and privately run (by the friends and cronies of the U.S. government) registries. Even then, there is no guarantee that someone wishing to steal your personal creations won't successfully call your work an orphan work, and then legally use it for free.
http://mag.awn.com/index.php?ltype=Colu … le_no=3605


I don't see how they can go through with this...

Thoughts?
konfusion
mostly afk
+480|6779|CH/BR - in UK

...Creative Commons license! Jeez! If I have to register my websites for copyright... BS!

I'd be so fucking pissed if someone stole my work...

-konfusion

Last edited by konfusion (2008-04-12 09:10:13)

DefCon-17
Maple Syrup Faggot
+362|6385|Vancouver | Canada
Well it might be just in the US.

I'm not completely sure how it'll work.
konfusion
mostly afk
+480|6779|CH/BR - in UK

DefCon-17 wrote:

Well it might be just in the US.

I'm not completely sure how it'll work.
Anything on the internet is international, really...

-konfusion
DefCon-17
Maple Syrup Faggot
+362|6385|Vancouver | Canada
The internet doesn't really have laws though.

..Except maybe against child pornography.

Edit: Well apparently the guy who wrote the article blew it out of proportion.

You can only use someone's art without permission if you have done your best to contact them, but can't.
..If the bill passes.

Last edited by DefCon-17 (2008-04-12 21:40:02)

Graphic-J
The Artist formerly known as GraphicArtist-J
+196|6355|So Cal

DefCon-17 wrote:

Well it might be just in the US...
...
What the?!...
https://i44.tinypic.com/28vg66s.jpg
DefCon-17
Maple Syrup Faggot
+362|6385|Vancouver | Canada

GraphicArtist J wrote:

DefCon-17 wrote:

Well it might be just in the US...
...
What the?!...
Read my edit.

It's not that bad.
OmniDeath
~
+726|6873

Maybe this should be in Debate and serious talk, as it will effect far far more than just "Graphics".
DefCon-17
Maple Syrup Faggot
+362|6385|Vancouver | Canada
Meh, someone else can do that.
Zimmer
Un Moderador
+1,688|6985|Scotland

Can't move it. Move system is bust.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard