http://www.gameplayer.com.au/Home/NEWS/ … e47946bc45Originally Posted by GamePlayer Australia
We published an article a few weeks back called Microsoft in GTA IV Panic in which we detailed how the industry giant was stressing about the number of PS3 consoles the release of GTA IV would ship over Xbox 360s.
We argued that this was evident in the way Microsoft had gone about marketing the Xbox 360 version of the game. We also pointed out how Sony had, it appeared, done very little in response (you’ll have to read it for the full explanation).
Now we know why.
As you have no doubt read, it has come to light that a new version of the PS3 will be made available in time for the launch of GTA IV. It is the 40GB model of the console, but it comes bundled with GTA IV. This is a big, big deal. Especially as the package doesn’t cost any more money than the unbundled version of the console.
The deal is only officially announced for a UK release, but we’ve been given the tip-off that Australia will receive the deal too… in fact we’ve heard unconfirmed reports that some retailers are already promoting it. And if it is making it all the way to little ‘ol Oz, then it should hit every other major territory as well.
This is a massive blow for Microsoft, who has already lowered the Xbox 360’s price point in Europe, and paid US$50 million for downloadable content in an attempt to lure the 12 million-odd PS2 owning GTA fans away from the Sony brand. Given the money and marketing that Microsoft has thrown at Rockstar, the console manufacturer may have expected to get some support back from the developer. On the contrary, Rockstar has, deliberately or not, undermined Microsoft’s chances of not only shipping a bucket-load of consoles, but potentially from coming out on top of the console wars.
Make no mistake; this play by Sony is the most explosive strike yet in the ongoing war between the two console makers.
We’ll probably never know whether Sony paid megabucks for this deal or not, but the facts are on the table. Sony’s most affordable version of the PS3 will come bundled with GTA IV. Currently, in Australia, that model retails for $699 (and has room to move should Sony feel the need).
What does Microsoft offer By comparison, local retailer Harvey Norman is promoting an Xbox 360 Elite with GTA IV for $698 (it RRPs for $729 without the game). It’s the same price, but of course the Xbox 360 is minus Blu-ray, built-in wireless and, yes we have to say it, reliability. This is the only bundled deal we have found for the Xbox 360 thus far.
If those missing features don’t bother you, you can always look at the other Xbox 360 SKUs that don’t come bundled with GTA IV. You can buy the arcade console for $399, and the game at $119, to be playing the game for $520. You will not be able to play online, however, and will be limited to 256MBs worth of saves and patches - unless you want to spend more on a hard-drive.
And what of the standard premium pack? Well it is $579 which, if you buy GTA IV at $119, comes to the same value as the elite deal at Harvey Norman. Which makes the premium console frickin’ worthless.
So for the informed consumer, this deal makes it something of a no-brainer. The best value for money deal in order to play GTA IV is Sony’s 40GB bundle. And no, we haven’t forgotten which console has the best game’s library, DLC and online, but as we argued here, this won’t mean a lot to a casual consumer who just wants to play GTA IV.
Bring on the 29th
Make sure you check out our GTA IV Multiplayer Hands-on. It will leave you very excited, and offers some support to why the Xbox 360 version of the game will probably be superior, even if in terms of pure console sales, it is looking like the PS3 might romp home.
sux2b microsoft
that is hilarious.
hahahaa
Don't see anything wrong with this on Sony's part- nor Rockstar's. Brilliant marketing. Cunningly kept the strategy quiet from other large competitors (competitors of which just so happen to be corporate monopoly-giants)- and now Sony has the upperhand in a segment of the market that pretty much has 'Micro$oft' all over it.
(Disclaimer: I am not an anti-Microsoft Apple/Linux/1337zor fanboy. I just encourage business competition wherever possible. It makes the market environment all the better for the consumer; cheaper prices, higher quality products, and a bigger variety of choice).
(Disclaimer: I am not an anti-Microsoft Apple/Linux/1337zor fanboy. I just encourage business competition wherever possible. It makes the market environment all the better for the consumer; cheaper prices, higher quality products, and a bigger variety of choice).
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Uh oh looks like Sony had a trump card after all. The vast vast majority won't know/care if the 360 version has downloadable content, but ALL will see that they can get a PS3 and GTA bundle.
Looks like Microsoft has just wasted a lot of money.
Looks like Microsoft has just wasted a lot of money.
Last edited by Spidery_Yoda (2008-04-12 05:55:55)
LOL, im chuckling about this because i loved how all the fan boys were like "yeah xbox gets DLC", which Sony just doesnt care about they are about making money for themselves! This is genius strategy from sony.
A very good strategy. If I didn't have either a PS3 or 360, I'd probably get a PS3 because of this...
Kinda sad that GTA started on the Playstation and now the other consoles' version is going to be better...
That's the only thing I read in the article that was really worth caring about.Make sure you check out our GTA IV Multiplayer Hands-on. It will leave you very excited, and offers some support to why the Xbox 360 version of the game will probably be superior, even if in terms of pure console sales, it is looking like the PS3 might romp home.
Kinda sad that GTA started on the Playstation and now the other consoles' version is going to be better...
Last edited by Poseidon (2008-04-12 07:45:15)
I don't see how you think it's better asides from some DLC IGN's side-by-side comparison said the PS3's version has better anti-aliasing while the 360 has slightly richer colors. I personally prefer less jaggies over richer colors, but to each his own.Poseidon wrote:
A very good strategy. If I didn't have either a PS3 or 360, I'd probably get a PS3 because of this...That's the only thing I read in the article that was really worth caring about.Make sure you check out our GTA IV Multiplayer Hands-on. It will leave you very excited, and offers some support to why the Xbox 360 version of the game will probably be superior, even if in terms of pure console sales, it is looking like the PS3 might romp home.
Kinda sad that GTA started on the Playstation and now the other consoles' version is going to be better...
also: http://www.gamecollision.com/news/grand … -confirmed
Last edited by HurricaИe (2008-04-12 07:49:37)
Doesn't really matter for me, as I've got the better console
DLC's a big part...once the story's over, besides multiplayer, there's not much you can do. And with the way XBL works, Multiplayer will be better too.HurricaИe wrote:
I don't see how you think it's better asides from some DLC IGN's side-by-side comparison said the PS3's version has better anti-aliasing while the 360 has slightly richer colors. I personally prefer less jaggies over richer colors, but to each his own.Poseidon wrote:
A very good strategy. If I didn't have either a PS3 or 360, I'd probably get a PS3 because of this...That's the only thing I read in the article that was really worth caring about.Make sure you check out our GTA IV Multiplayer Hands-on. It will leave you very excited, and offers some support to why the Xbox 360 version of the game will probably be superior, even if in terms of pure console sales, it is looking like the PS3 might romp home.
Kinda sad that GTA started on the Playstation and now the other consoles' version is going to be better...
also: http://www.gamecollision.com/news/grand … -confirmed
Plus, that article says:
"Everything after that is purely speculation. The article talks about two possible scenarios, one being that Microsoft only paid for timed exclusivity and the PS3 will eventually be getting the same thing. The other, more realistic scenario, is that the downloadable content will be in the form of PlayStation Home unlockables. Considering that almost every game from here out will have some sort of Home-integration (most being game-themed wallpapers, furniture, etc.), that does make a lot of sense."
So wow, you guys get stuff for PS Home...big deal. Home's a cool thing, but if the 360 version had a Home-type thing, I'd prefer the in-game DLC any day.
You're most likely NOT going to get the in-game DLC. MS didn't pay $50 million for nothing.
No.kptk92 wrote:
Doesn't really matter for me, as I've got the better console
#rekt
SnooooooooooooreMint Sauce wrote:
No.kptk92 wrote:
Doesn't really matter for me, as I've got the better console
Yes.
Sorry but where do people get this idea that XBL is better than PSN? I have both consoles, and i can tell you. They are pretty much EXACTLY the same. Its total crap that XBL is better.Poseidon wrote:
DLC's a big part...once the story's over, besides multiplayer, there's not much you can do. And with the way XBL works, Multiplayer will be better too.HurricaИe wrote:
I don't see how you think it's better asides from some DLC IGN's side-by-side comparison said the PS3's version has better anti-aliasing while the 360 has slightly richer colors. I personally prefer less jaggies over richer colors, but to each his own.Poseidon wrote:
A very good strategy. If I didn't have either a PS3 or 360, I'd probably get a PS3 because of this...
That's the only thing I read in the article that was really worth caring about.
Kinda sad that GTA started on the Playstation and now the other consoles' version is going to be better...
also: http://www.gamecollision.com/news/grand … -confirmed
Plus, that article says:
"Everything after that is purely speculation. The article talks about two possible scenarios, one being that Microsoft only paid for timed exclusivity and the PS3 will eventually be getting the same thing. The other, more realistic scenario, is that the downloadable content will be in the form of PlayStation Home unlockables. Considering that almost every game from here out will have some sort of Home-integration (most being game-themed wallpapers, furniture, etc.), that does make a lot of sense."
So wow, you guys get stuff for PS Home...big deal. Home's a cool thing, but if the 360 version had a Home-type thing, I'd prefer the in-game DLC any day.
You're most likely NOT going to get the in-game DLC. MS didn't pay $50 million for nothing.
Yes!kptk92 wrote:
SnooooooooooooreMint Sauce wrote:
No.kptk92 wrote:
Doesn't really matter for me, as I've got the better console
Yes.
QFT. I've used both. XBL is about the same as PSN.Vilham wrote:
Sorry but where do people get this idea that XBL is better than PSN? I have both consoles, and i can tell you. They are pretty much EXACTLY the same. Its total crap that XBL is better.Poseidon wrote:
DLC's a big part...once the story's over, besides multiplayer, there's not much you can do. And with the way XBL works, Multiplayer will be better too.HurricaИe wrote:
I don't see how you think it's better asides from some DLC IGN's side-by-side comparison said the PS3's version has better anti-aliasing while the 360 has slightly richer colors. I personally prefer less jaggies over richer colors, but to each his own.
also: http://www.gamecollision.com/news/grand … -confirmed
Plus, that article says:
"Everything after that is purely speculation. The article talks about two possible scenarios, one being that Microsoft only paid for timed exclusivity and the PS3 will eventually be getting the same thing. The other, more realistic scenario, is that the downloadable content will be in the form of PlayStation Home unlockables. Considering that almost every game from here out will have some sort of Home-integration (most being game-themed wallpapers, furniture, etc.), that does make a lot of sense."
So wow, you guys get stuff for PS Home...big deal. Home's a cool thing, but if the 360 version had a Home-type thing, I'd prefer the in-game DLC any day.
You're most likely NOT going to get the in-game DLC. MS didn't pay $50 million for nothing.
i mark it up to fanboy syndromeVilham wrote:
Sorry but where do people get this idea that XBL is better than PSN? I have both consoles, and i can tell you. They are pretty much EXACTLY the same. Its total crap that XBL is better.
to conclude:
PS3 > xbox360
PS3 > xbox360
oh okSamTheMan:D wrote:
to conclude:
PS3 < xbox360
Poseidon wrote:
Home's a cool thing
Poseidon wrote:
oh okSamTheMan:D wrote:
to conclude:
PS3 < xbox360
Ya, PS3 wins.
X360 has nothing else to bring to the table. XBL is, like people already said it, similar to the PSN.
It has the advantage of people paying and getting patches for games.
But thats it. Nothing else.
X360 has nothing else to bring to the table. XBL is, like people already said it, similar to the PSN.
It has the advantage of people paying and getting patches for games.
But thats it. Nothing else.
I bet a lot of the people who are going to get this game will already have a console. Minor inconvenience for Microsoft.
Why are people always fighting...what started the crap between the two consoles? F*ck If I like this kind of coffee and you like that kind of coffee I wont insult you. I got an xbox elite a week ago and I love it. Got It cause of the price. And people saying the DLC for GTA4 wont matter much...you wont be saying that when they drop.
K3rt6699 wrote:
Why are people always fighting...what started the crap between the two consoles?
Way to contradict yourself...K3rt6699 wrote:
And people saying the DLC for GTA4 wont matter much...you wont be saying that when they drop.