Zimmer
Un Moderador
+1,688|6973|Scotland

White-Fusion wrote:

kylef wrote:

Pandora, anyone?
This is alot better than Pandora.
I disagree. As I generally listen to music above 320KBPS quality, this site makes all the music sound like total crap. It's muffled, has no decent bass or midtones. It's at most 128KBPS. I can't stand bad music quality.

Nice find for the people who don't mind about music quality.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6838|London, England

Zimmer wrote:

White-Fusion wrote:

kylef wrote:

Pandora, anyone?
This is alot better than Pandora.
I disagree. As I generally listen to music above 320KBPS quality, this site makes all the music sound like total crap. It's muffled, has no decent bass or midtones. It's at most 128KBPS. I can't stand bad music quality.

Nice find for the people who don't mind about music quality.
That Pandora site doesn't work for UK-fags, and if you can find me a proxy that can stream 320KBPS nicely from the site, then you'll be worthy of being called Zimmrar
Funky_Finny
Banned
+456|6350|Carnoustie, Scotland

Zimmer wrote:

White-Fusion wrote:

kylef wrote:

Pandora, anyone?
This is alot better than Pandora.
I disagree. As I generally listen to music above 320KBPS quality, this site makes all the music sound like total crap. It's muffled, has no decent bass or midtones. It's at most 128KBPS. I can't stand bad music quality.

Nice find for the people who don't mind about music quality.
Tbfh, I think you should get new speakers. This sounds fine, although most of my WMP music is 128kbs.
Entertayner
Member
+826|6788

www.last.fm > all.
S3v3N
lolwut?
+685|6736|Montucky
This is pretty kick ass
Nakamp
Member
+25|6412|Czech Republic
I filtered a bit and got almost RATM only... nice
Zimmer
Un Moderador
+1,688|6973|Scotland

Funky_Finny wrote:

Zimmer wrote:

White-Fusion wrote:


This is alot better than Pandora.
I disagree. As I generally listen to music above 320KBPS quality, this site makes all the music sound like total crap. It's muffled, has no decent bass or midtones. It's at most 128KBPS. I can't stand bad music quality.

Nice find for the people who don't mind about music quality.
Tbfh, I think you should get new speakers. This sounds fine, although most of my WMP music is 128kbs.
Then I am sorry, but you have no love for music.

You seriously have no idea what you are talking about, do you?

Go to a music compare site comparing 128KBPS to 320KBPS, you will want to change immediately. I showed Omnideath the difference with Dream Theater, he was so shocked that he couldn't listen to 128KBPS anymore.

New speakers? I have some of the best creative speakers available, with an awesome bass system.

Come back when you know something about music and quality.
Funky_Finny
Banned
+456|6350|Carnoustie, Scotland

Zimmer wrote:

Funky_Finny wrote:

Zimmer wrote:


I disagree. As I generally listen to music above 320KBPS quality, this site makes all the music sound like total crap. It's muffled, has no decent bass or midtones. It's at most 128KBPS. I can't stand bad music quality.

Nice find for the people who don't mind about music quality.
Tbfh, I think you should get new speakers. This sounds fine, although most of my WMP music is 128kbs.
Then I am sorry, but you have no love for music.

You seriously have no idea what you are talking about, do you?

Go to a music compare site comparing 128KBPS to 320KBPS, you will want to change immediately. I showed Omnideath the difference with Dream Theater, he was so shocked that he couldn't listen to 128KBPS anymore.

New speakers? I have some of the best creative speakers available, with an awesome bass system.

Come back when you know something about music and quality.
Well, I wasn't talking about the love of music and music quality, I was simply saying that 128kbs is adequate, I listen on my Creative Cambridge Soundworks and a Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS sound card.

Mind pushing me in the way of a 320kbs site?
What speed does a CD play at or does it depend on the tracks put on it?
ig
This topic seems to have no actual posts
+1,199|6740
de la, tribe, rakim; me likes
Zimmer
Un Moderador
+1,688|6973|Scotland

Funky_Finny wrote:

Well, I wasn't talking about the love of music and music quality, I was simply saying that 128kbs is adequate, I listen on my Creative Cambridge Soundworks and a Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS sound card.

Mind pushing me in the way of a 320kbs site?
What speed does a CD play at or does it depend on the tracks put on it?
CDs play music quality above 320KBPS. Anything that isn't MP3 is generally above 320KBPS.

Tbh, with that system, 128KBPS is really not adequate.

Add me on Xfire and I will show you the difference.
Funky_Finny
Banned
+456|6350|Carnoustie, Scotland

Zimmer wrote:

Funky_Finny wrote:

Well, I wasn't talking about the love of music and music quality, I was simply saying that 128kbs is adequate, I listen on my Creative Cambridge Soundworks and a Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS sound card.

Mind pushing me in the way of a 320kbs site?
What speed does a CD play at or does it depend on the tracks put on it?
CDs play music quality above 320KBPS. Anything that isn't MP3 is generally above 320KBPS.

Tbh, with that system, 128KBPS is really not adequate.

Add me on Xfire and I will show you the difference.
You gunna send me stuff?
Home
Section.80
+447|7065|Seattle, Washington, USA

Wow, I actually got some good hip hop. Public Enemy, Wu, Cypress Hill, ATCQ, Mobb Deep, Gang Starr... Not bad.
..teddy..jimmy
Member
+1,393|6867
It's not THAT bad zimmer

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard