Without the vehicles of course...
Just a realization that most of CoD4 plays out like a Karkand hotel battle.
Just a realization that most of CoD4 plays out like a Karkand hotel battle.
Poll
CoD4 = Karkand v2.0?
| Yes | 38% | 38% - 50 | ||||
| No | 51% | 51% - 67 | ||||
| Undecided | 10% | 10% - 14 | ||||
| Total: 131 | ||||||
No? what are you basing this on?
Just a realization that most of CoD4 plays out like a Karkand hotel battle.
Have you only played one map or something?superfly_cox wrote:
Just a realization that most of CoD4 plays out like a Karkand hotel battle.
No.
Explain more now
Explain more now
chaotic close quarter camping nadespam without any teamplay in most public servers - yes.. it reminds me of karkand...
You must be quite naive if you expect teamplay on public servers in any game.[pt] KEIOS wrote:
chaotic close quarter camping nadespam without any teamplay in most public servers - yes.. it reminds me of karkand...
Yes, which is why I can only play for a few minutes before getting a strong urge to teamkill everyone on my team.
No, are they giving free crack?
Its needs bigger map, bring back Foy!!
If you're going to look at it that way then every public server of every fps game is karkand v2. Camping, spam and poor teamwork is all anyone expects from pubs, if you don't like it go play competitive matches or stop playing fps games.
Yes because you get basically unlimited nades and health..........oh wait, no you don't. And also the same spawn points and routes take EVERY single time....oh wait, no you don't. Supply crates and C4 yourself on top of buildings.....nope. Dolphin diving and spawn camping....not so much. So no, your theory is incorrect.
Last edited by usmarine2005 (2007-12-05 11:56:45)
I think its a pretty good analogy.
i think it's a pretty shit analogy tbh.Spearhead wrote:
I think its a pretty good analogy.
Shadow893 wrote:
i think it's a pretty shit analogy tbh.Spearhead wrote:
I think its a pretty good analogy.
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
No. Most maps are smaller.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
kinda true kinda not....BF2 pulled it off with squads, not guaranteed to work but you can typically find a few to work with even in pubs.DefCon-17 wrote:
You must be quite naive if you expect teamplay on public servers in any game.[pt] KEIOS wrote:
chaotic close quarter camping nadespam without any teamplay in most public servers - yes.. it reminds me of karkand...
even in CSS people at least often use the mic, and so at times team work happens by accident.
Out of games with no team work CoD4 is defiantly head of the class. I've still only heard voip used like twice. (S&D is your only hope on CoD4)
I'm happy with the "barely any mic users" situation.VicktorVauhn wrote:
kinda true kinda not....BF2 pulled it off with squads, not guaranteed to work but you can typically find a few to work with even in pubs.DefCon-17 wrote:
You must be quite naive if you expect teamplay on public servers in any game.[pt] KEIOS wrote:
chaotic close quarter camping nadespam without any teamplay in most public servers - yes.. it reminds me of karkand...
even in CSS people at least often use the mic, and so at times team work happens by accident.
Out of games with no team work CoD4 is defiantly head of the class. I've still only heard voip used like twice. (S&D is your only hope on CoD4)
I can't stand a bunch of little kids telling their team what to do.
Fuck no. How would a whole game be compared to just a map to BF2?
Project Reality for BF2 is definitely head of the mods and games that have teamwork. Out of hours playing vBF2, I have found out that PR has way more teamwork and people playing with a mic. The squad system in BF2 is phail if no one even bothered to join a squad or create one.
Project Reality for BF2 is definitely head of the mods and games that have teamwork. Out of hours playing vBF2, I have found out that PR has way more teamwork and people playing with a mic. The squad system in BF2 is phail if no one even bothered to join a squad or create one.
That's like saying "The MP7 is fail because no one uses it."firebolt5 wrote:
The squad system in BF2 is phail if no one even bothered to join a squad or create one.
I love it when people compare completely different games. They are FPS games, thats all their similarity.
QFTVilham wrote:
I love it when people compare completely different games. They are FPS games, thats all their similarity.
and, the maps are too small for squads....
16p with squads on maps this small? why would you need it for example, on vacant?
agrees ^^
COD4 is also not designed for the really serious gamer... fast rank up.. easy challanges... its designed for ppl that wont obsess over it... unlike BF2 which is a epic game....
personaly i think they have different target audiences and therefore cannot be compared on the basis of map size and team work tactics
COD4 is also not designed for the really serious gamer... fast rank up.. easy challanges... its designed for ppl that wont obsess over it... unlike BF2 which is a epic game....
personaly i think they have different target audiences and therefore cannot be compared on the basis of map size and team work tactics
Hold on a second.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
agrees ^^
COD4 is also not designed for the really serious gamer... fast rank up.. easy challanges... its designed for ppl that wont obsess over it... unlike BF2 which is a epic game....
personaly i think they have different target audiences and therefore cannot be compared on the basis of map size and team work tactics
Sick amounts of ammo or health is for the serious gamer as in bf2?
roger that
No, are you basing that because of the urban maps or what?