[PTG]shogun
PS n00b & proud vista user
+44|6696

LT.Victim wrote:

ATI's Crossfire out performs Nvidia's SLI... Interesting..

I get 45 FPS on Med-high..

Once I upgrade my Video card, I'll hopefully get above 65 FPS on very High Settings.

[PTG]shogun wrote:

[PTG]shogun wrote:

unless its official or from a reputable hardware site like [H]OCP i wont belive any of it

game benchmarks always go into 1600s X 1000s (all the diffrent res's like 1680X1050 andd 19 etc.)
and they didn't state the speed of the ram etc.
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7107|Alberta, Canada

7900GS

Med-High with a fps of 30 at 1280x1024

I guess I'll be going all medium then.

Is 30 even good? Or is that bad lag?

Last edited by Ryan (2007-06-20 13:15:46)

LT.Victim
Member
+1,175|6826|British Columbia, Canada

[PTG]shogun wrote:

LT.Victim wrote:

ATI's Crossfire out performs Nvidia's SLI... Interesting..

I get 45 FPS on Med-high..

Once I upgrade my Video card, I'll hopefully get above 65 FPS on very High Settings.

[PTG]shogun wrote:

[PTG]shogun wrote:

unless its official or from a reputable hardware site like [H]OCP i wont belive any of it

game benchmarks always go into 1600s X 1000s (all the diffrent res's like 1680X1050 andd 19 etc.)
and they didn't state the speed of the ram etc.
You can't prove it the information is true or not, so therefore, its the only thing that I'm basing my numbers off of.

At least I can get a general Idea of what kind of FPS I'm going to be getting, then to have no idea at all.. It would suck big time to buy the game then find out out get 12 FPS on Low Settings, and having no money to spend on upgrades..

Then to know what kind of FPS your going to be getting, and hopefully saving up some money to buy upgrades before the game comes out.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6486|Escea

I'll be updating my processor, RAM and video card over the next few months up to Christmas, Ill utilise full graphics when I can, Crysis doesn't come out for a hell of a long time anyway.
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7107|Alberta, Canada

M.O.A.B wrote:

Crysis doesn't come out for a hell of a long time anyway.
3 months from now.
[PTG]shogun
PS n00b & proud vista user
+44|6696

LT.Victim wrote:

[PTG]shogun wrote:

LT.Victim wrote:

ATI's Crossfire out performs Nvidia's SLI... Interesting..

I get 45 FPS on Med-high..

Once I upgrade my Video card, I'll hopefully get above 65 FPS on very High Settings.

[PTG]shogun wrote:


You can't prove it the information is true or not, so therefore, its the only thing that I'm basing my numbers off of.

At least I can get a general Idea of what kind of FPS I'm going to be getting, then to have no idea at all.. It would suck big time to buy the game then find out out get 12 FPS on Low Settings, and having no money to spend on upgrades..

Then to know what kind of FPS your going to be getting, and hopefully saving up some money to buy upgrades before the game comes out.
face it no PC today can get 100% out of crysis
a decent PC brought 1 and a half years ago can runit.

If you can play far cry on all high u can run crysis on all low.

its common sence realy omg i get 15 fps in bf2 = no crysis
60 on all high in BF2 = cryisi prob on all low
Brasso
member
+1,549|6894

Where's the 8600GTS?!

"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard