[Crysis] Speculated Performance for Video Cards

2007-06-20 07:17:40

#1

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6884|London, England

At some Crysis forum they've made some tables regarding performance and how Crysis might run with regards to specific video cards.
Enough with the words, here's the table:

http://www.crysis-online.com/forum/inde … 567.0.html

Apparently, it's not "Official" but there are some people who are in with the development who helped, or something. Anyway, just take it as a rough guide and for upgrading purposes.

Notice how the highest res they're using is 1280x1024, makes you regret your exotic 1600x1200 doesn't it? Not that i have one big monitor, shit my video card isn't even on the list.

Last edited by Mekstizzle (2007-06-20 07:22:10)

2007-06-20 07:20:27

#2

OakLeaves: Banned; +70|6579|Newcastle UK

35 fps on low ffs.

2007-06-20 07:27:46

#3

Madiz: is back; +26|7020

@ high 35 FPS

https://i524.photobucket.com/albums/cc328/Madiz991/signa.jpg

2007-06-20 07:29:58

#4

r'Eeee: That's how I roll, BITCH!; +311|6712

@ not even in da list!

2007-06-20 07:31:35

#5

Madiz: is back; +26|7020

rabee2789b wrote:
@ not even in da list!

lol too bad

2007-06-20 07:35:16

#6

floodgate: Member; +2|6452

woo if thats correct i'll be playing at 50 fps on very high

just high will do me though

2007-06-20 07:38:59

#7

daffytag: cheese-it!; +104|6839

rabee2789b wrote:
@ not even in da list!

9600xt and an amd 2500 1.8Ghz 1gb ram, I think it will be an instant fire inside my pc.

Last edited by daffytag (2007-06-20 07:40:05)

2007-06-20 07:47:28

#8

BigmacK: Back from the Dead.; +628|7014|Chicago.

rabee2789b wrote:
@ not even in da list!

Same here.

Damnit.

2007-06-20 07:51:15

#9

Vilham: Say wat!?; +580|7030|UK

high at 50 FPS. Fine for me.

2007-06-20 07:51:59

#10

Bertster7: Confused Pothead; +1,101|6845|SE London

Looks like a load of nonsense to me, those frame rates to settings just don't add up. I really wouldn't pay any attention to this whatsoever.

2007-06-20 08:02:47

#11

Noobeater: Northern numpty; +194|6710|Boulder, CO

yay, if i get another gig of ram then its all on very high.

2007-06-20 08:05:33

#12

Bertster7: Confused Pothead; +1,101|6845|SE London

Noobeater wrote:
yay, if i get another gig of ram then its all on very high.

You've got a G80 and only 1GB of RAM? That's some poorly planned system design.

Also, don't believe this rubbish.

2007-06-20 08:06:38

#13

Hurricane: Banned; +1,153|6894|Washington, DC

Yeah, wasn't there some hoax a while back where some site said that even the best cards out wouldn't run it buttery smooth?

Oh and my card isn't on the list either =/ more of a reason to beg on the streets for $2000. *Dons homeless man outfit*

2007-06-20 08:12:53

#14

Doctor Strangelove: Real Battlefield Veterinarian.; +1,758|6732

HOLY SHIT!

I can run Crysis on very high and still get an FPS of ~60!

Fuck Yeah!

2007-06-20 08:33:47

#15

[PTG]shogun: PS n00b & proud vista user; +44|6696

unless its official or from a reputable hardware site like [H]OCP i wont belive any of it

game benchmarks always go into 1600s X 1000s (all the diffrent res's like 1680X1050 andd 19 etc.)
and they didn't state the speed of the ram etc.

2007-06-20 08:57:10

#16

Cubefreak666: I kill you in future, too; +34|6896|Germany

Yeah--- 35fps on low

2007-06-20 10:50:45

#17

ELITE-UK: Scratching my back; +170|6737|SHEFFIELD, ENGLAND

30fps approx, but with my new job, i can save up for all the top parts oh yes!!!!

2007-06-20 10:55:23

#18

']['error: Banned; +630|6907|The Netherlands

35fps on high! 7900GT single + 2 gb ram.
Only problem is my shitty processor, an pentium4 @ 3 ghz.

2007-06-20 11:00:39

#19

doc. josh: Member; +48|6808

yea 85FPS

2007-06-20 11:02:05

#20

Entertayner: Member; +826|6834

50fps on Very High once I get my GTS.

2007-06-20 11:09:52

#21

[PTG]shogun: PS n00b & proud vista user; +44|6696

[PTG]shogun wrote:
unless its official or from a reputable hardware site like [H]OCP i wont belive any of it

game benchmarks always go into 1600s X 1000s (all the diffrent res's like 1680X1050 andd 19 etc.)
and they didn't state the speed of the ram etc.

2007-06-20 11:40:28

#22

r'Eeee: That's how I roll, BITCH!; +311|6712

doc. josh wrote:
yea 85FPS

Not 90 though

2007-06-20 12:30:15

#23

Scorpion0x17: can detect anyone's visible post count...; +691|7029|Cambridge (UK)

X800 not on list, but it's slightly less good than a X850, so shite.

2007-06-20 12:37:42

#24

stef10: Member; +173|6746|Denmark

hmm, well I have 1.5 gig of ram, a 3.0 pentium and a x1950 pro 512 mb---hmmm

2007-06-20 13:00:08

#25

LT.Victim: Member; +1,175|6826|British Columbia, Canada

ATI's Crossfire out performs Nvidia's SLI... Interesting..

I get 45 FPS on Med-high..

Once I upgrade my Video card, I'll hopefully get above 65 FPS on very High Settings.

BF2S Forums [Crysis] Speculated Performance for Video Cards

rabee2789b wrote:

rabee2789b wrote:

rabee2789b wrote:

Noobeater wrote:

[PTG]shogun wrote:

doc. josh wrote:

Board footer